Skip to content

A Comparison of Two Nebulisers for Sputum Induction

A Comparison of Two Nebulisers for Performing Sputum Induction to Assess Airway Inflammation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04182009
Acronym
FLAME
Enrollment
54
Registered
2019-12-02
Start date
2018-09-17
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2019-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma, COPD

Keywords

Asthma, COPD, Nebuliser, Sputum Induction, Safety, Tolerability, Quality, Quantity, Physiotherapy

Brief summary

Sputum induction is considered a relatively non-invasive, reliable procedure, which can be utilised to characterise the inflammatory profile of the airways. However, the procedure can be slightly uncomfortable for patients. This study aims to assess the differences in participants' tolerability of sputum induction, by comparing two different nebulisers when performing the procedure.

Detailed description

This is a single centre, crossover study to compare the use of two nebulisers in the sputum induction procedure. 54 participants with stable asthma or COPD will be recruited and will attend 2 visits, at least 48 hours apart. Differences in the quality and quantity of samples and the time taken to produce a sample will be described. The main purpose is to explore the optimum device to perform the procedure, whilst protecting the safety of participants and maximising their comfort. If participants are unable to produce a sputum sample after completion of the induction procedure, physiotherapy techniques may be performed. This is an exploratory objective to establish whether these techniques may help in the event of unsuccessful procedures.

Interventions

DEVICEOmron NE-U17 Ultrasonic nebuliser

The Omron Ultrasonic nebuliser dispenses sterile saline from a medication cup as an aerosol, which is inhaled.

DEVICEAkita Jet Inhalation System

The Akita Jet Inhalation System is a breath actuated nebuliser, which works with a positive pressure.

Sponsors

University of Nottingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have an ability to provide fully informed consent. * Have a diagnosis of asthma or COPD. * Male or female. * Age between 18 to 75 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Have a post bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second of less than 1 litre or less than 50 percent of the predicted value. * Have an exacerbation of asthma or COPD within the 30 days prior to the first visit. * Have a history or current evidence of an upper or lower respiratory infection, within the 30 days prior to the first visit. * Have any other clinically significant medical disease or uncontrolled concomitant disease, that is likely, in the opinion of the investigators to impact on the ability to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The tolerability to sputum induction testDuring the visit, after each cycle of nebulisation (each 5 minutes)Checking discomfort degree due to inhalation of hypertonic saline assessed by a visual analogue scale (0 to 10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Borg ScaleDuring the visit, up to 4 hoursMeasurement of dyspnoea levels
The quality of sputum samplesDuring the processing time, 2 hoursThe analysis of squamous contamination in the sample (if \>40%), viability (\>65% of life cells) and quality of slide for differential cells count
The quantity of sputum samplesDuring the visit, up to 4 hoursHow much sputum sample was produced of sufficient quality for processing
SpirometryDuring the visit, up to 4 hoursMeasurement of lung function (FEV1 and FEV1%pred)
Saline quantityDuring the visit, up to 30 minutesThe amount of sterile saline required to produce a sputum sample sufficient for processing
Influence of Physiotherapy techniquesDuring the study visit, up to 5 minutesThe influence of manual vibrations and Huff cough in producing a sputum sample after unsuccessful induction attempts
Time to produce sampleDuring the visit, up to 30 minutesThe time in minutes required to produce a sputum sample sufficient for processing

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactDr Paula Almeida, PT, DHSc
paula.almeida@nottingham.ac.uk0115 9691169
Backup ContactKatherine M Smith, BA(Hons), MA
katherine.m.smith@nottingham.ac.uk0115 8231911

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026