Skip to content

Real-world Study Comparing the Adherence and Effectiveness of Linagliptin vs. Acarbose

A Non-interventional Study of Patient Medication Adherence and Treatment Effectiveness Among New Users of Linagliptin and Acarbose in the Real-world Clinical Setting in China

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04180813
Enrollment
85
Registered
2019-11-29
Start date
2020-03-04
Completion date
2021-07-11
Last updated
2022-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

Non-interventional cohort study based on newly collected data under routine medical practice of a total of 500 Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 patients

Interventions

DRUGLinagliptin

drug

DRUGAcarbose

drug

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient should fully know and understand the content of consent form, and the patient is willing and able to sign an informed consent form * Chinese outpatients with confirmed T2DM * Patients of ≥ 18, \< 80 years old * Patients currently use metformin monotherapy ≥ 1500 mg/day or maximum tolerable dose and whose glucose levels are not adequately controlled * HbA1c ≥ 7% and \< 12% * New user\* linagliptin or acarbose as combination therapy with metformin ≥ 1500 mg/day or maximum tolerable dose \*New user defined as a T2DM patient initiating linagliptin or acarbose as an add-on therapy. These are patients who are on metformin and whose glucose levels are not adequately controlled.

Exclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who previously used any DPP-4 inhibitor/ GLP-1 receptor agonist at index date or any AGI at index date, are not eligible to participate. Also excluded are patients who currently using any glucose-lowering agent as monotherapy other than metformin. * Patients with clinically significant acute major organ or systemic disease or other condition judged by the investigator that would create difficulty for the 24-week follow-up. * Patients who participated in a clinical trial within 2 months prior to study enrolment date. * Patients diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, secondary diabetes or gestational diabetes. * Current treatment with systemic steroids at time of informed consent or within 6 weeks prior to informed consent. * Patients with known significant GI disease as judged by the study physician.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of T2DM patients with high medication adherence at Week 2424 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The effectiveness of linagliptin and acarbose on glycemic control evaluated by reducing HbA1c during a 24 week follow-up in two groups24 weeks
Proportion of T2DM patients achieving a therapeutic glycemic response defined as HbA1c < 7.0% or a lowering of HbA1c ≥ 0.5%24 weeks
To compare the composite endpoint (proportion of achieving HbA1c < 7.0% without gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs) and without an investigator defined hypoglycaemic event)24 weeks
Patient satisfaction by Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) among linagliptin and acarbose initiators. The DTSQ would be completed at routine physician visits since initiation of the drug24 weeks

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026