Skip to content

Mid-Q Response Study

Mid-Q Response Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04180696
Enrollment
177
Registered
2019-11-27
Start date
2020-01-23
Completion date
2024-03-28
Last updated
2025-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Heart Failure NYHA Class II, Heart Failure NYHA Class III, Heart Failure NYHA Class IV, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), Left Bundle-Branch Block

Brief summary

The Mid-Q Response study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled, interventional, single-blinded, post-market study. The purpose of the Mid-Q Response study is to test the hypothesis that the AdaptivCRT (aCRT) algorithm is superior to standard CRT therapy regarding patient outcomes in CRT indicated patients with moderate QRS duration, preserved atrioventricular (AV) conduction and left bundle branch block (LBBB). The study will be executed at approximately 60 centers in Asia. The subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the aCRT ON (Adaptive Bi-V and LV) group or the aCRT OFF (Nonadaptive CRT) group. The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that aCRT ON increases the proportion of patients that improve on the Clinical Composite Score (CCS) compared to aCRT OFF at 6 months of follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEaCRT ON

CRT device with AdaptivCRT enabled

DEVICEaCRT OFF

CRT device with AdaptivCRT disabled

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Eligible subjects will be randomized after baseline assessment and implant of a CRT system containing the aCRT algorithm. Randomization will be done in a 1:1 ratio to either treatment (aCRT ON, Adaptive Bi-V and LV) or control (aCRT OFF, Nonadaptive CRT) groups. All subjects, independent of randomization assignment, will have a CRT system.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is willing to sign and date the study Informed Consent Form (ICF). * Subject is indicated for a CRT device according to local guidelines. * Subject has sinus rhythm at time of enrollment * Subject has a moderately wide intrinsic QRS duration ≥120 ms and \<150 ms * Subject has Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB) as documented on an ECG (preferably within 30 days prior to enrollment but up to 50 days is accepted) with Qs or rS in leads V1 and V2, and Mid-QRS notching or slurring in ≥2 of leads V1, V2, V5, V6, I, and aVL * Subject has intrinsic, normal AV conduction as documented on an ECG by a PR interval ≤200 ms (preferably within 30 days prior to enrollment but up to 50 days is accepted). * Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% (documented within 180 days prior to enrollment). * Subject has NYHA class II, III, or IV (documented within 30 days prior to enrollment) despite optimal medical therapy. Optimal medical therapy is defined as maximal tolerated dose of Beta-blockers and a therapeutic dose of ACE-I, ARB or MRA.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject is less than 18 years of age (or has not reached minimum age per local law if that is higher). * Subject is not expected to remain available for at least 1 year of follow-up visits. * Subjects has permanent atrial arrhythmias for which pharmacological therapy and/or cardioversion have been unsuccessful or have not been attempted. * Subject is, or previously has been, receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. * Subject is currently enrolled or planning to participate in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of this study. Co-enrollment in concurrent trials is only allowed when documented pre-approval is obtained from the Medtronic study manager. * Subject has unstable angina, or experienced an acute myocardial infarction (MI) or received coronary artery revascularization (CABG) or coronary angioplasty (PTCA) within 30 days prior to enrollment. * Subject has a mechanical tricuspid heart valve or is scheduled to undergo valve repair or valve replacement during the course of the study. * Subject is post heart transplant (subjects on the heart transplant list for the first time are not excluded). * Subject has a limited life expectancy due to non-cardiac causes that would not allow completion of the study. * Subject is pregnant (if required by local law, women of child-bearing potential must undergo a pregnancy test within seven days prior to device implant). * Subject meets any

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Composite Score6 months post-randomizationThe Clinical Composite Score (CCS) classifies patients according their clinical status at 6 months post-randomization into categories Improved, Unchanged, and Worsened. A patient is classified Worsened in case of death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, worsened New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (using last observation carried forward), or worsened status on the Global Assessment Score. Also, patients that exit the study or cross over because of worsening heart failure are classified Worsened. A patient is classified Improved when not Worsened and there is an improvement in NYHA class or Global Assessment Score. Patients that are not Worsened or Improved are Unchanged including all patients that miss NYHA class and Global Assessment Score data and are not classified Worsened because of death, HF hospitalization, exit or crossover.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaseline to 6 and 12 months post-randomizationNYHA class is an ordinal variable with higher classes indicating a worse degree of heart failure: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m).Comfortable only at rest. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.
Occurrence of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure12 months post-randomizationDefined as an event requiring inpatient hospitalization or invasive intervention
All-cause Mortality12 months post-randomizationAll-cause mortality in the aCRT ON group vs the aCRT OFF group
Cardiovascular-related Mortality12 months post-randomizationDefined as all cardiac deaths as well as any cardiovascular deaths that are not directly a result of mechanical or electrical heart dysfunction.

Countries

Brunei, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was multicentric and in a hospital setting, patients selected were heart failure patients in Asian countries indicated for CRT per local guidelines with moderately wide QRS (duration ≥120ms and \<150ms), preserved AV conduction (PR interval ≤ 200 ms), along with a Left bundle branch block (LBBB).

Pre-assignment details

Patients were enrolled as long as they met the inclusion criteria and were willing to consent. A total of 177 subjects were enrolled, of which 171 subjects were randomized between Adaptive and Conventional CRT.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)
AdaptivCRT programmed to Adaptive Bi-V and LV The aCRT algorithm has been developed to provide RV-synchronized LV pacing when intrinsic AV conduction is normal or BiV pacing otherwise. aCRT ON: CRT device with AdaptivCRT enabled
86
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)
AdaptivCRT programmed to Nonadaptive CRT (standard CRT). Control group subjects will be optimized per physician's discretion. The method of AV and VV optimization in the control group will be collected. aCRT OFF: CRT device with AdaptivCRT disabled
85
Total171

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath56
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Total
Age, Continuous67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
LVEF27.0 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
25.2 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
26.1 percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
NYHA class
NYHA class I
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
NYHA class
NYHA class II
30 Participants31 Participants61 Participants
NYHA class
NYHA class IIII
52 Participants47 Participants99 Participants
NYHA class
NYHA class IV
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
PR interval173.2 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21
174.3 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.4
173.7 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1
QRS duration136.9 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
136.1 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
136.5 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants25 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants60 Participants117 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 866 / 85
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 8614 / 85
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 8624 / 85

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Composite Score

The Clinical Composite Score (CCS) classifies patients according their clinical status at 6 months post-randomization into categories Improved, Unchanged, and Worsened. A patient is classified Worsened in case of death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, worsened New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (using last observation carried forward), or worsened status on the Global Assessment Score. Also, patients that exit the study or cross over because of worsening heart failure are classified Worsened. A patient is classified Improved when not Worsened and there is an improvement in NYHA class or Global Assessment Score. Patients that are not Worsened or Improved are Unchanged including all patients that miss NYHA class and Global Assessment Score data and are not classified Worsened because of death, HF hospitalization, exit or crossover.

Time frame: 6 months post-randomization

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Clinical Composite ScoreUnchanged10 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Clinical Composite ScoreImproved66 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Clinical Composite ScoreWorsened10 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Clinical Composite ScoreImproved68 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Clinical Composite ScoreUnchanged11 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Clinical Composite ScoreWorsened6 Participants
p-value: 0.61Chi-squared
Secondary

All-cause Mortality

All-cause mortality in the aCRT ON group vs the aCRT OFF group

Time frame: 12 months post-randomization

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)All-cause Mortality5 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)All-cause Mortality6 Participants
p-value: 0.78Log Rank
Secondary

Cardiovascular-related Mortality

Defined as all cardiac deaths as well as any cardiovascular deaths that are not directly a result of mechanical or electrical heart dysfunction.

Time frame: 12 months post-randomization

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Cardiovascular-related Mortality3 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Cardiovascular-related Mortality3 Participants
p-value: 0.9895% CI: [0.206, 5.056]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class

NYHA class is an ordinal variable with higher classes indicating a worse degree of heart failure: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc. Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m).Comfortable only at rest. Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 and 12 months post-randomization

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaselineClass I1 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaselineClass II30 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaselineClass III/IV55 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class3 MonthClass III/IV11 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class3 MonthNot reported2 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6 MonthClass I23 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6 MonthClass II50 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6 MonthClass III/IV11 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6 MonthNot reported2 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class12 MonthClass I35 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class12 MonthClass III/IV8 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class12 MonthNot reported2 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaselineNot reported0 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class3 MonthClass I24 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class3 MonthClass II49 Participants
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class12 MonthClass II41 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaselineNot reported0 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaselineClass I1 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class12 MonthClass I32 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class3 MonthClass I22 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaselineClass III/IV53 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class3 MonthClass II53 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class12 MonthClass III/IV9 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class3 MonthClass III/IV4 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class12 MonthClass II42 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class3 MonthNot reported6 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class12 MonthNot reported2 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6 MonthClass I27 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassBaselineClass II31 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6 MonthClass II52 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6 MonthNot reported3 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class6 MonthClass III/IV3 Participants
Comparison: Due to limited number of subjects with NYHA class III or IV during follow-up, class III, IV, and death were grouped as a single category for analysis.p-value: 0.6395% CI: [0.579, 2.455]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Occurrence of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure

Defined as an event requiring inpatient hospitalization or invasive intervention

Time frame: 12 months post-randomization

Population: All randomized subjects

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AdaptivCRT ON (aCRT ON, Treatment Group)Occurrence of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure10 Participants
AdaptivCRT OFF (aCRT OFF, Control Group)Occurrence of Hospitalizations for Worsening Heart Failure8 Participants
p-value: 0.6495% CI: [0.492, 3.175]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026