Skip to content

Movement Analysis of Stroke Patients When Walking on a Treadmill

Movement Analysis of Stroke Patients When Walking on a Treadmill

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04180124
Enrollment
25
Registered
2019-11-27
Start date
2020-01-06
Completion date
2020-09-15
Last updated
2021-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Gait pattern, Treadmill walking, Arm swing

Brief summary

In daily clinic, the use of treadmills to analyze the gait quality of a patient increases. The advantages of using a treadmill are that a smaller space is needed compared to a 3D lab for motion analysis, more steps can be recorded in shorter time period and patients should not start, stop or rotate during the analyses. One of the systems which can be used to perform motion analysis on a treadmill is the GRAIL. This GRAIL (Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab) consists of an advanced treadmill with force sensors. Patients can walk on this treadmill with an imposed speed (fixed-speed) or at a speed determined by the patient itself (self-paced). Because not everyone is used to walk on a treadmill it is important to know if a person's walking pattern is different when he walks over ground compared to walking on the treadmill. Based on these insights, decisions can be made regarding interventions including treadmill training or this findings can be taking into account during further analysis of walking patterns on a treadmill. For this study stroke patients would be invited for an assessment on the treadmill (1 assessment moment). The movement pattern of these patients would be compared in different conditions: * (Forward and backward) Walking at comfortable walking speed on the GAITRite * Walking at comfortable walking speed on the treadmill in fixed speed mode * Walking at comfortable walking speed +0.2 m/s (faster walking) on the treadmill in fixed speed mode * Walking at comfortable walking speed on the treadmill in self-paced mode * Backward walking at comfortable walking speed on the treadmill in fixed speed mode (only if patients are eligible to do so) Hypotheses based on this study protocol: * Do stroke patients walk different over ground compared to treadmill walking * Do stroke patients walk different during treadmill walking self-paced compared to fixed speed * Do stroke patients walk different during treadmill walking fixed speed comfortable walking speed compared to fast walking * Is there a correlation between upper extremity impairment and arm swing

Interventions

OTHERWalking

Patients walk over ground on a mat with sensors and on a treadmill with sensors (in different conditions) to compare their movement pattern. Also the movement pattern will be compared between walking at comfortable walking speed en fast walking. Finally, the correlation between upper extremity impairment and arm swing will be investigated.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Ghent
CollaboratorOTHER
University Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stroke patients with the ability to walk without walking devices for 6 minutes without rest (indoor walking). Use of AFO is allowed if necessary.

Exclusion criteria

* Traumatic brain lesions (car accident, fall with bike, …) * Other disorders such as neurologic, musculoskeletal, respiratory or severe cardiovascular disorders that affected gait performance * Bilateral stroke * Cerebellar stroke * Orthopedic surgery lower limbs in the past * Cognitive or language impairments that prevent the patients from understand simple orders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in kineticsSingle point of assessment in one dayChange in full body 3D kinetic analyses during walking
Change in kinematicsSingle point of assessment in one dayChange in full body 3D kinematic analyses during walking (°)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postural stability testBaseline assessment before walking trialsBalance test
Fugl Meyer assessment ULBaseline assessment before walking trialsImpairment test for upper extremity in stroke patients: Fugl Meyer assessment - score between 0 and 66. Higher score reflects less impairment of the upper limb.
Lateral rotation of the scapulaBaseline assessment before walking trialsLateral rotation of the scapula measured with an inclinometer (°)
Fugl Meyer assessment LLBaseline assessment before walking trialsImpairment test for lower extremity in stroke patients: Fugl Meyer assessment lower extremity. Scores between 0 - 34. Higher score reflects less impairment of the lower limb.
Speed variability during self-paced treadmill walkingSingle point of assessment in one dayAverage walking speed (and standard deviation) during self-paced treadmill walking

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Demographic variablesBefore walking trialsgender, age, stroke type, stroke date, hemiparetic side, use of walking aids for outdoor walking

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026