Skip to content

Safety, Tolerability and Drug- Drug Interaction Study of Ubrogepant With Erenumab or Galcanezumab in Participants With Migraine

A Phase 1b, Two-Part, Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence, Safety, Tolerability and Drug-Drug Interaction Study Between Single Dose Erenumab or Galcanezumab and Multiple Dose Ubrogepant in Participants With Migraine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04179474
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-11-27
Start date
2019-09-26
Completion date
2019-12-23
Last updated
2021-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine

Keywords

ubrogepant, erenumab, galcanezumab, safety, tolerability, interaction

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction and provide safety and tolerability information when ubrogepant and erenumab or ubrogepant and galcanezumab are co-administered.

Interventions

Oral administration of 100 mg ubrogepant tablet once daily \[Intervention A=single dose and Intervention D=repeated daily dose\].

DRUGErenumab

Single dose subcutaneous (SC) injection of erenumab 140 mg \[Intervention B\].

DRUGGalcanezumab

2 SC injections of galcanezumab 120 mg \[Intervention C\].

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least a 1-year history of migraine with or without aura consistent with a diagnosis according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, (ICHD-3, 2018) * By history, the participant's migraines typically last between 4 and 72 hours if untreated or treated unsuccessfully and migraine episodes are separated by at least 48 hours of headache pain freedom * History of at least 2 migraine attacks per month in the 2 months prior to Screening * Have a sitting pulse rate ≥ 45 beats per minute (bpm) and ≤ 100 bpm during the vital sign assessment at the Screening Visit. Clinical site may perform a maximum of 2 repeats of vital sign measurements if the initial measurement is out of range. * Negative test results for benzoylecgonine (cocaine), methadone, barbiturates, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, opiates, and phencyclidine at the Screening Visit and Day -1; unless explained by concomitant medication use (eg, opioids prescribed for migraine pain) * Participants willing to minimize the risk of inducing pregnancy for the duration of the clinical study and follow-up period

Exclusion criteria

* Difficulty distinguishing migraine headache from tension-type or other headaches * Has a history of migraine aura with diplopia or impairment of level of consciousness, hemiplegic migraine, or retinal migraine as defined by ICHD-3 * Has a current diagnosis of new persistent daily headache, trigeminal autonomic cephalgia (eg, cluster headache), or painful cranial neuropathy as defined by ICHD-3 * Required hospital treatment of a migraine attack 3 or more times in the 6 months prior to Screening * Has a chronic non-headache pain condition requiring daily pain medication (with the exception of pregabalin) * Has clinically significant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease per the investigator's opinion * Previously participated in an investigational study of ubrogepant * Participation in any other clinical investigation using an experimental drug within 30 days prior to study intervention administration * Participation in a blood or plasma donation program within 60 or 30 days, respectively, prior to study intervention administration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Time t (AUC0-t) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With ErenumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 2: AUC0-t for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With GalcanezumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With ErenumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 2: AUC0-∞ for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With GalcanezumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 1: Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With ErenumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 2: Cmax for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With GalcanezumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With ErenumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 2: CL/F for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With GalcanezumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With ErenumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 2: Vz/F for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With GalcanezumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 1: Time of Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With ErenumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Number of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesEOD: Within 7 days of Day 16 or at the time of early termination (Up to Day 16); Follow-up Visit 30 days after last dose (Up to Day 45 +/-3 days)Laboratory assessments included Chemistry, Hematology and Urinalysis tests. The investigator determined if the postbaseline laboratory results were potentially clinically significant using the Clinical Laboratory PCS Criteria in the SAP. Assessments of Chemistry only were collected at the Final Follow-up Visit
Number of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Physical Examination ValuesEOD: Within 7 days of Day 16 or at the time of early termination (Up to Day 16)
Number of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesEOD: Within 7 days of Day 16 or at the time of early termination (Up to Day 16)A standard 12-lead ECG was performed. The investigator determined if the ECG postbaseline values were potentially clinically significant using the ECG PCS Criteria in the SAP.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationFirst dose to within 30 days after last dose (Up to Day 45 +/-3 days)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or a participant using an investigational drug, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. The investigator determined if the AE was causally related to treatment. The investigator determined if the severity of the AE was Mild (transient with minimal intervention that does not interfere with usual activities), Moderate ( usually alleviated with an intervention, interferes with usual activities causing discomfort but does not cause permanent harm) or Severe (interrupts usual activities, affects clinical status or requires intensive intervention).
Number of Participants Who Had Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Postbaseline Vital Sign ValuesEnd of Dosing (EOD): Within 7 days of Day 16 or at the time of early termination (Up to Day 16)Vital Signs included assessments of Blood Pressure, Pulse Rate, Weight, Respiratory Rate and Temperature. The investigator determined if the postbaseline Vital Sign values were potentially clinically significant using the Vital Sign PCS Criteria in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP).
Part 2: Tmax for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With GalcanezumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 1: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With ErenumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 2: λz for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With GalcanezumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (T½) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With ErenumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose
Part 2: T½ for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With GalcanezumabDay 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1 (Intervention A Then B Then D)
Intervention A: Single oral dose of ubrogepant 100 mg tablet on Day 1 under fasted conditions; followed by Intervention B: Single subcutaneous (SC) injection of erenumab 140 mg on Day 8; followed by Intervention D: Ubrogepant 100 mg tablet orally once daily on Days 12, 13, 14 and 15 under fasted conditions.
20
Part 2 (Intervention A Then C Then D)
Intervention A: Single oral dose of ubrogepant 100 mg tablet on Day 1 under fasted conditions; followed by Intervention C: Two SC injections of galcanezumab 120 mg on Day 8; followed by Intervention D: Ubrogepant 100 mg tablet orally once daily on Days 12, 13, 14 and 15 under fasted conditions.
20
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1 (Intervention A Then B Then D)TotalPart 2 (Intervention A Then C Then D)
Age, Customized32.2 years35.3 years38.4 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants36 Participants16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants23 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
20 Participants40 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants22 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants18 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 190 / 190 / 200 / 200 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 208 / 197 / 192 / 203 / 204 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 190 / 190 / 200 / 200 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab1878.25 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 497.82
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-∞) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab1993.40 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 639.22
Comparison: A linear mixed-effects model with study intervention as fixed effect and participant as a random effect was used to determine the Geometric Means.90% CI: [96.19, 115.45]
Primary

Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Time t (AUC0-t) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: Pharmacokinetic 1 (PK1) population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Time t (AUC0-t) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab1841.42 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 490.17
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Time t (AUC0-t) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab1959.96 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 639.51
Comparison: A linear mixed-effects model with study intervention as fixed effect and participant as a random effect was used to determine the Geometric Means.90% CI: [96.21, 115.79]
Primary

Part 1: Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Erenumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 1: Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Erenumab459.32 ng/mLStandard Deviation 168.56
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 1: Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Cmax) for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Erenumab486.80 ng/mLStandard Deviation 201.52
Comparison: A linear mixed-effects model with study intervention as fixed effect and participant as a random effect was used to determine the Geometric Means90% CI: [93.01, 115.98]
Primary

Part 2: AUC0-∞ for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 2: AUC0-∞ for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab1732.22 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 928.06
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 2: AUC0-∞ for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab1793.74 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 1057.02
Comparison: A linear mixed-effects model with study intervention as fixed effect and participant as a random effect was used to determine the Geometric Means.90% CI: [89.68, 122.38]
Primary

Part 2: AUC0-t for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 2: AUC0-t for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab1700.31 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 913.42
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 2: AUC0-t for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab1758.05 ng*h/mLStandard Deviation 1033.44
Comparison: A linear mixed-effects model with study intervention as fixed effect and participant as a random effect was used to determine the Geometric Means.90% CI: [89.55, 123.19]
Primary

Part 2: Cmax for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 2: Cmax for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab415.34 ng/mLStandard Deviation 225.64
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 2: Cmax for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab375.12 ng/mLStandard Deviation 152.08
Comparison: A linear mixed-effects model with study intervention as fixed effect and participant as a random effect was used to determine the Geometric Means.90% CI: [82.27, 120.45]
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

A standard 12-lead ECG was performed. The investigator determined if the ECG postbaseline values were potentially clinically significant using the ECG PCS Criteria in the SAP.

Time frame: EOD: Within 7 days of Day 16 or at the time of early termination (Up to Day 16)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received/took at least 1 administration of study intervention in Part 1 or Part 2.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory Values

Laboratory assessments included Chemistry, Hematology and Urinalysis tests. The investigator determined if the postbaseline laboratory results were potentially clinically significant using the Clinical Laboratory PCS Criteria in the SAP. Assessments of Chemistry only were collected at the Final Follow-up Visit

Time frame: EOD: Within 7 days of Day 16 or at the time of early termination (Up to Day 16); Follow-up Visit 30 days after last dose (Up to Day 45 +/-3 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received/took at least 1 administration of study intervention in Part 1 or Part 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesHematology; EOD0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesChemistry; EOD0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesChemistry; Follow-up Visit1 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesUrinalysis; EOD1 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesUrinalysis; EOD0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesHematology; EOD1 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesChemistry; Follow-up Visit1 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Laboratory ValuesChemistry; EOD0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had PCS Postbaseline Physical Examination Values

Time frame: EOD: Within 7 days of Day 16 or at the time of early termination (Up to Day 16)

Population: As per the SAP, abnormalities in physical examinations during the study were captured in medical history or Adverse Events (AEs) data panels. Therefore, there were no separate analyses for physical examination planned.

Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Postbaseline Vital Sign Values

Vital Signs included assessments of Blood Pressure, Pulse Rate, Weight, Respiratory Rate and Temperature. The investigator determined if the postbaseline Vital Sign values were potentially clinically significant using the Vital Sign PCS Criteria in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP).

Time frame: End of Dosing (EOD): Within 7 days of Day 16 or at the time of early termination (Up to Day 16)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received/took at least 1 administration of study intervention in Part 1 or Part 2.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants Who Had Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Postbaseline Vital Sign Values0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants Who Had Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Postbaseline Vital Sign Values0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to Discontinuation

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or a participant using an investigational drug, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. The investigator determined if the AE was causally related to treatment. The investigator determined if the severity of the AE was Mild (transient with minimal intervention that does not interfere with usual activities), Moderate ( usually alleviated with an intervention, interferes with usual activities causing discomfort but does not cause permanent harm) or Severe (interrupts usual activities, affects clinical status or requires intensive intervention).

Time frame: First dose to within 30 days after last dose (Up to Day 45 +/-3 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received/took at least 1 administration of study intervention. Data is reported by intervention actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll AEs7 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Mild7 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Moderate0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Severe0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs2 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant AloneNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Mild8 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Severe0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll AEs8 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Moderate0 Participants
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs7 Participants
Part 1: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 Participants
Part 1: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs5 Participants
Part 1: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Severe1 Participants
Part 1: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Moderate0 Participants
Part 1: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll AEs7 Participants
Part 1: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Mild6 Participants
Part 2: Intervention A (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Severe0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention A (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Mild2 Participants
Part 2: Intervention A (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Moderate0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention A (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention A (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention A (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll AEs2 Participants
Part 2: Intervention C (Galcanezumab)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll AEs3 Participants
Part 2: Intervention C (Galcanezumab)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs3 Participants
Part 2: Intervention C (Galcanezumab)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Mild3 Participants
Part 2: Intervention C (Galcanezumab)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Moderate0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention C (Galcanezumab)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Severe0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention C (Galcanezumab)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Severe0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Moderate0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationRelated AEs3 Participants
Part 2: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation0 Participants
Part 2: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAEs by Severity: Mild4 Participants
Part 2: Intervention D (Ubrogepant)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity, Related AEs and AEs Leading to DiscontinuationAll AEs4 Participants
Secondary

Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab57.35 liter/hourStandard Deviation 17.2
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance of Drug From Plasma After Extravascular Administration (CL/F) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab54.74 liter/hourStandard Deviation 16.27
Secondary

Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Erenumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Erenumab436.95 literStandard Deviation 158.11
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase After Extravascular Administration (Vz/F) for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Erenumab375.84 literStandard Deviation 161.42
Secondary

Part 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (T½) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (T½) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab5.26 hourStandard Deviation 1
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 1: Terminal Elimination Half-life (T½) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab4.62 hourStandard Deviation 0.94
Secondary

Part 1: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 1: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab0.136 1/hourStandard Deviation 0.025
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 1: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab0.156 1/hourStandard Deviation 0.034
Secondary

Part 1: Time of Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 1: Time of Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab1.50 hour
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 1: Time of Maximum Plasma Drug Concentration (Tmax) for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Erenumab1.48 hour
Secondary

Part 2: CL/F for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 2: CL/F for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab72.90 liter/hourStandard Deviation 38.07
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 2: CL/F for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab68.94 liter/hourStandard Deviation 28.12
Secondary

Part 2: T½ for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 2: T½ for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab5.04 hourStandard Deviation 1.47
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 2: T½ for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab4.60 hourStandard Deviation 1.35
Secondary

Part 2: Tmax for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 2: Tmax for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab1.50 hour
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 2: Tmax for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab1.50 hour
Secondary

Part 2: Vz/F for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Galcanezumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 2: Vz/F for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Galcanezumab568.66 literStandard Deviation 497.92
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 2: Vz/F for Ubrogepant Alone in Combination With Galcanezumab449.26 literStandard Deviation 213.84
Secondary

Part 2: λz for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab

Time frame: Day 1 (Treatment Period 1): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose; Day 12 (Day 1 of Treatment Period 3): Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 14, and 24 hours postdose

Population: PK1 population included all participants who had evaluable plasma PK parameters of ubrogepant for both ubrogepant alone and ubrogepant in combination with erenumab or galcanezumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1: Ubrogepant AlonePart 2: λz for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab0.150 1/hourStandard Deviation 0.053
Part 1: Ubrogepant in Combination With ErenumabPart 2: λz for Ubrogepant Alone and in Combination With Galcanezumab0.165 1/hourStandard Deviation 0.056

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026