Skip to content

Comparative Analysis of a Non-contact Respiratory and Heart Rate Monitor Vs. a Conventional Clinically Validated Reference Monitor

Comparative Analysis of a Non-contact Respiratory and Heart Rate Monitor Vs. a Conventional Clinically Validated Reference Monitor

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04179279
Enrollment
130
Registered
2019-11-27
Start date
2019-10-06
Completion date
2020-01-27
Last updated
2020-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate

Brief summary

This is a prospective pivotal study in patients admitted/visiting the cardiology ward and/or outpatient clinics for various indications. The study will be conducted in two stages. The first stage will comprise a pilot study with 10 subjects, which will be completed and analyzed prior to initiation of the second stage. The two studies are independent and are included in the same protocol for logistical reasons. The second stage of the study, which will include 120 subjects, is pivotal and intended to validate the Gili BioSensor System. Testing procedure will include seating the subject in either a steady chair in front of a table, or in bed with the bedrest raised in front of a cardiac table (or similar). The subject will be seated for 5 minutes to reach a physiological steady state. During this time, the subject will be connected to the reference device according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The investigational device will be placed on a stable surface in front of the subject (table / cardiac table or similar) and will point to the left side of the subject's chest. Both the investigational and reference devices will be temporally synchronized to maintain coordinated recording. Following the 5-minute resting period, both investigational and reference devices will be activated for a comparative recording session to acquire at least 180 seconds (3 minutes) of evaluable data. Each 60-sec interval will be used separately for comparative analyses.

Interventions

DEVICEGili Biosensor System (Gili Pro Biosensor)

Non-contact monitoring of heart and respiratory rates using an optical device

Sponsors

ContinUse Biometrics Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18, male or female * Hemodynamically stable as assessed by the investigator * Willing and able to sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to consent/comply with study protocol * Presence of a condition that may interfere with the devices' performance (e.g. nausea, vomiting, persistent coughing, tremor, mouth breathing, etc.) * Use of reflective garment, (e.g. sequin, silk, or similar), or highly textured garments (e.g. fur, thick lace, shaggy wool etc.). * Parallel participation in another clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart rateDuring the procedureHeart rate will be compared to a reference: * Accurate = 1 = device outcome is within ± 5 bpm or ± 10% bpm relative to reference, whichever is greater * Inaccurate = 0 = otherwise
Respiratory rateDuring the procedureRespiratory rate will be compared to a reference: * Accurate = 1 = device outcome is within ± 2 breaths/min relative to reference * Inaccurate = 0 = otherwise

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety evaluationDuring the procedureThe Gili BioSensor System functions without physical contact with the inspected subject, and is compared in this study to a reference device routinely used as standard of care (SOC). Consequently, we do not expect any safety issues. At the same time, any adverse events (AE) observed during the procedure and/or during the study and/or follow-up period will be recorded in the CRF.

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026