Skip to content

Effects of Nutrients Supplementation in Antidepressant Treated Depressive Disorder Patients

Effects of Nutrients Supplementation in Antidepressant Treated Depressive Disorder Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04179006
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-11-26
Start date
2019-11-14
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2021-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major

Keywords

Major depressive disorder, Supplement nutrients, Antidepressants

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled to evaluate the potential role of nutrients supplementation (LF chocolate /Erinacine A-enriched Hericium Erinaceus chocolate) on the therapeutic efficacy of antidepressants in major depressive disorder(MDD). 120 subjects who meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized into three categories, receiving 3 pieces of supplement nutrients-added or plain chocolates per day for a period of 24 weeks in total. The three categories are as follow: 1. LF chocolate 2. Erinacine A-enriched Hericium Erinaceus chocolate 3. Plain chocolate without any supplementary nutrients added (placebo group) These MDD patients will continue their antidepressant regimen throughout the study. Symptom rating, blood samples for antidepressant-related/depressive disorder-related genome profiles identification, as well as for biomarkers assessment for metabolic indices, questionnaires and tests for psychosocial variables identification and patient's cognitive and social cognitive function or performance determination, will be carried out before and at certain time points within the 24-week tracking period. Patient's fecal samples will be acquired to recognize and to distinguish the alterations of these MDD patients microbiota profiles over the 24-week period.

Detailed description

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, severe, and often life-threatening illness that involves the body, mood, and thoughts. Recent reports suggested that immune dysfunction could be linked with cognitive impairment and metabolic comorbidities, and accumulating evidence suggested that the regulation of the microbiota- gut-brain axis has been shown to impact inflammation and to affect brain function. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled is to evaluate the potential role of nutrients supplementation (LF chocolate /Erinacine A-enriched Hericium Erinaceus chocolate) on the therapeutic efficacy of antidepressants in major depressive disorder(MDD). 120 MDD outpatients (aged 20-70 years) from the National Cheng Kung University Hospital who meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores ≥ 7, receiving fluoxetine or venlafaxine so as SSRI or SNRI antidepressants will be enrolled. Subjects who meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized into three categories, with 40 subjects each, receiving 3 pieces of supplement nutrients-added or plain chocolates (placebo) manufactured by GRAPE KING BIO LTD per day for a period of 24 weeks in total. The three categories are as follow: 1. LF chocolate 2. Erinacine A-enriched Hericium Erinaceus chocolate 3. Plain chocolate without any supplementary nutrients added (placebo group) These MDD patients will continue their antidepressant regimen throughout the study. Follow-up visits will be arranged at week no. 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24, in which week no. 0, 4, 12 and 24 will be the four most important re-visit timing. Various assessments or tests will be arranged in these 24-week period. Symptom rating with 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) by psychiatrist will be done at every visits. Blood samples for antidepressant-related/depressive disorder-related genome profiles identification, as well as for biomarkers assessment for metabolic indices, will be obtained at week no. 0, 4, 12 and 24. Questionnaires aimed for psychosocial variables (environmental factors) identification including social support scales (SSS), quality of life scale (QOLs) and Recent life changes questionnaire (RCLQ) will be self-answered by patients. Continuous Performance Test (CPT), finger-Tapping Test (FPT) and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) will be utilized to evaluate their cognitive performance. Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional Intelligent Test (MSCEIT) will help in social cognitive function assessment. Patient's fecal samples will be acquired at week no. 0, 4, 12 and 24 to recognize and to distinguish the alterations in MDD patients microbiota profiles.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLF/Erinacine A-enriched Hericium/Plain chocolate + antidepressant(s)

3 pieces per day

Sponsors

Grape King Bio Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Major depressive disorder (MDD) outpatients meet DSM- criteria * Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) ≥ 7 * Start to receive fluoxetine or venlafaxine or those who have received the SSRI or SNRI antidepressants

Exclusion criteria

* (A) had DSM-5 diagnosis for substance abuse within the past three months; * (B) had taken monoamine oxidase inhibitors; * (C) had an organic mental disorder, mental retardation, dementia, or other diagnosed neurological illness; * (D) had a surgical condition or a major physical illness; * (E) pregnant or breast-feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in participant's Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scoreweek no. 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Depressive symptom rating; 21 items int total, eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe, while nine are scored from 0-2; \[higher scores denote worse symptoms/signs of depression\]
Change in participant's BW(kg), Height(cm), Waist circumference(cm), BMI (kg/m2)week no. 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24Metabolic indices; BW (to the nearest 0.1 kg), height (to the nearest 0.1 cm), and waist circumference (to the nearest 0.1 cm), weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2
Change in participant's Glucose profilesweek no. 0, 4, 12, 24Metabolic indices; HbA1c(%)+Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl)+Fasting serum insulin concentrations (uIU/ml)+Homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index+Homeostasis model of assessment for pancreatic β-cell secretory function (HOMA-β) {HOMA- IR= \[fasting plasma insulin level (uIn/ml)\*fasting plasma glucose level (mg/dl)/405\]; HOMA- IR ≥2.5 =\> Insulin resistance (+)} {HOMA-β= (360× fasting serum insulin \[uIn/ml\]) / (fasting plasma glucose \[mg/dL\] -63)}
Change in participant's Fasting serum leptin level (ng/mL)week no. 0, 4, 12, 24Metabolic indices
Change in participant's Fasting serum lipid profilesweek no. 0, 4, 12, 24Metabolic indices; including Fasting total cholesterol(mg/dL), High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol(mg/dL), Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol(mg/dL), Triglyceride (TG) concentration(mg/dL)
Change in participant's Cortisol(ug/dL) levelweek no. 0, 4, 12, 24Metabolic indices
Change in participant's C-peptide(ng/dL)week no. 0, 4, 12, 24Metabolic indices
Change in participant's Inflammatory cytokines levelsweek no. 0, 4, 12, 24Metabolic indices; Fasting plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) level (pg/mL) + Oxytocin(pg/mL) + Leptin(mg/mL)
Change in participants's Quality of life scale (QOLs) scores [WHOQOL-BREF]week no. 0, 4, 12, 24Psychosocial variables as environment factors; Quality of Life Scale developed through the World Health Organization (WHOQOL-BREF) & Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) questionnaires will be used as assessment tools WHOQOL-BREF: 4 domains will be assessed, consists of 1. Physical Health 2. Psychological 3. Social Relationship 4. Environment; \[higher scores in each domains denote higher quality of life\]
Change in participants's Quality of life scale (QOLs) scores [HRQOL]week no. 0, 4, 12, 24Psychosocial variables as environment factors; Quality of Life Scale developed through the World Health Organization (WHOQOL-BREF) & Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) questionnaires will be used as assessment tools HRQOL: 4 domains will be assessed, consists of 1. Physical Health 2. Psychological 3. Level of independence 4. Social Relationship \[higher scores in each domains denote higher quality of life\]
Change in participant's Cognitive performanceweek no. 0, 12, 24Continuous Performance Test (CPT)\[visual information processing & attentive capacity\], Finger Tapping Test (FPT), Wisconsin Card-Sorting Test (WCST)
Change in participant's Social cognitive functional performanceweek no. 0, 12, 24Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) scores; perceiving + facilitating + understanding + managing emotion
Change in participant's Microbiota profilesweek no. 0, 12, 24Fecal samples; Types of microorganisms + no. of colonies (colony-forming unit, CFU)

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactPo-See Chen, Professor
chenps@mail.ncku.edu.tw866-6-2353535
Backup ContactHui-Hua Chang, Professor
huihua@mail.ncku.edu.tw886-6-2353535

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026