Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.

Comparison of Postoperative Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy in Patients With Uterine Prolapse.

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04178083

Enrollment

120

Registered

2019-11-26

Start date

2020-01-01

Completion date

2020-12-30

Last updated

2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopy, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

laparoscopy, pelvic organ prolapse, modified lateral süspension, pectopexy, sacrohysteropexy, hysteropexy, sacropexy, cervicopexy, sacrocervicopexy

Brief summary

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.) We will evaluate Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative System (POP-Q), Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQoL), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), routine gynecologic USG, failure, complication, operation time .

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTmedical examination

medical examination

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

* patients requiring surgical treatment for the symptomatic stage of pelvic organ prolapse ≥ 2

Exclusion criteria

* Age \> 70 years * Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score	12 months after intervention	a system for assessing the degree of prolapse of pelvic organs

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Change from baseline Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire (PQoL) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse	12 months after intervention	The survey includes 20 questions grouped in chapters (areas) related to a specific aspect of quality of life
Change from baseline Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse	12 months after intervention	measures the effect of changes in pelvic organ prolapse on quality of life
Change from baseline Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain	12 months after intervention	Participant describes the pain related to the mesh
Failure (%)	12 months after intervention	Recurrence rate
Complications	12 months after intervention	İnjury

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026