Skip to content

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Osseous Low Alpha-Beta Resistant Metastases for Pain Relief

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Osseous Low Alpha-Beta Resistant Metastases for Pain Relief

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04177056
Acronym
SOLAR-P
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-11-26
Start date
2020-12-04
Completion date
2023-01-01
Last updated
2021-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Metastases, Breast Cancer, Melanoma, Prostate Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

SOLAR-P, SBRT, Bone metastases, stereotactic, pain relief, quality of life, palliation, low alpha beta, radioresistant

Brief summary

Radiation therapy has been shown to be very effective at relieving pain caused by bone metastases. However, certain types of cancers such as prostate, breast, kidney, and melanoma can have resistance to radiation, making treatment less successful. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a newer form of focused treatment that gives higher doses of radiation without damage to surrounding organs. It often is used to help control and cure disease, but less commonly as a way to palliate and treat symptoms. This study is looking at using SBRT for the purposes of improving pain caused by bone metastases in prostate cancer, breast cancer, kidney cancer, and melanoma patients. It is theorized that the higher levels of radiation may be able to combat the resistance some tumour cells have to radiotherapy and provide improved pain response to treatment. The investigators are looking to show that SBRT has a role in helping this group of patients deal with painful bone lesions from their cancer without increasing side effects and toxicity from the radiation treatment.

Detailed description

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has shown promising early results in the management of bone metastases. However, there is a paucity of prospective data studying the use of SBRT for bone metastases originating from low alpha-beta tumors, with systematic reporting of changes in pain scores and analgesia use over time. The vast majority data looking at SBRT in bone lesions focuses on local control and survival, rather than more tangible outcomes in a palliative population including symptomatic control, durability of response, and patient reported quality of life; a component that is understudied in this group despite its tremendous value. Furthermore, SBRT for bone metastases has yet to become common practice given the limited evidence for its efficacy and uncertainty in regards to toxicity. The current study proposes an investigation of the potential benefits of SBRT for symptomatic bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer, breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and sarcoma. The investigators look to conduct a prospective cohort study that is adequately powered to analyse efficacy in alleviating pain from bone lesions and compare this to well-established rates in literature for conventionally fractionated palliative RT. Furthermore, this study will assess the tolerability of this modality, toxicity rates, and effect on quality of life. If the results show that SBRT has a significant benefit on this population, the goal would be to pursue a larger randomized trial to confirm the findings.

Interventions

RADIATIONSBRT

Patients will received a single fraction of 15-20 Gy to bone metastases causing pain. Planning and delivery will be conducted using a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach on the Varian TrueBeam platform. Patients will be CT simulated, with vac-lock immobilization. Use of 4-dimensional CT will be dependent on the area being treated. Daily image guidance will be performed using cone beam CT aligning to relevant bony anatomy.

Sponsors

Juravinski Cancer Centre Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma * Radiographic evidence of bone metastases requiring treatment for pain * Brief Pain Inventory score of ≥ 2

Exclusion criteria

* Spinal lesions * Severe or progressive neurological deficit * Impending or existing pathological fracture * Bone metastasis in a previously irradiated site * Active systemic therapy * \>5 lesions requiring treatment * Lesions \>5 cm in largest diameter * Life expectancy \< 3 months * Age \< 18 * Karnofsky Performance Status \< 50 * Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Pain Response3 months after treatmentAssessed using the Brief Pain Inventory

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute Toxicity3 months or lessAccording to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0
Late Toxicitygreater than 3 monthsAccording to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0
Overall Pain Response6 months after treatmentAssessed using the Brief Pain Inventory
Local Controlup to 1 yearAssessed radiographically
Rate of Reirradiation/Salvage Surgeryup to 1 yearDue to instability or symptomatic progression
Patient-reported Quality of Life1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsAssessed by EORTC quality of life questionnaires

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactStephan Tran, MD
transt@hhsc.ca905-387-9711
Backup ContactEric K Nguyen, MD
eric.nguyen@medportal.ca905-387-9711

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026