Skip to content

The Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency Combined With Continuous Radiofrequency for the Trigeminal Neuralgia

The Efficacy and Safety of the Application of Pulsed Radiofrequency, Combined With Low-temperature Continuous Radiofrequency, to the Gasserian Ganglion for the Treatment of Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04174443
Acronym
PRFCRF
Enrollment
146
Registered
2019-11-22
Start date
2020-12-02
Completion date
2022-10-26
Last updated
2024-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trigeminal Neuralgia

Keywords

Trigeminal neuralgia, Pulsed radiofrequency, Continuous radiofrequency, High-voltage pulsed radiofrequency combined with low-temperature continuous radiofrequency

Brief summary

Trigeminal neuralgia is a very painful condition, and radiofrequency therapy is reserved for patients who are resistant or intolerant to pharmacological therapy. Continuous radiofrequency and pulsed radiofrequency both have advantages and disadvantages. Recently, studies have found that pulsed radiofrequency combined with low-temperature (\<65 °C) continuous radiofrequency increases the efficacy of the treatment, without leading to a significant increase in complications caused by nerve lesions. However, these reports have some limitations. The investigators plan to conduct a randomized, controlled study to compare the efficacy of applying high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency, with and without low-temperature continuous radiofrequency, to the gasserian ganglion for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. The primary outcome will be the effectiveness of the treatment after 12 months which is the percentage of participants with a modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score between I-III.

Interventions

2 Hz of pulsed radiofrequency will be administered at a voltage of 70 V, temperature of 42 °C, pulse width of 20 ms, and treatment time of 600 s.

PROCEDURELow-temperature continuous radiofrequency

Low-temperature continuous radiofrequency will be performed at 60 °C, with a treatment time of 270 s.

Sponsors

Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition criteria. * Aged 18-75 years (inclusive), no sex limitation. * Suffering from severe trigeminal neuralgia that cannot be alleviated effectively using conservative medical therapy such as carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine. * Numeric rating scale score≥7 before the procedure. * Agreed to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary trigeminal neuralgia such as trigeminal neuralgia attributed to a space-occupying lesion or multiple sclerosis. * Infection at the puncture site. * A history of psychiatric disease. * Disorder indicated in the results of routine blood tests, hepatic function, renal function, coagulation function, electrocardiogram, or chest X-ray. * Serious systemic diseases such as uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, and cardiac dysfunction (II-III of the New York Heart Association classification). * A history of abuse of narcotics. * A history of receiving continuous radiofrequency to the gasserian ganglion or peripheral branches; glycerol rhizolysis; balloon compression; gamma knife; or any other neuroablative treatments. * A history of receiving microvascular decompression.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The percentage of participants with a modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score of I-IIITwelve months after the procedureThe modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (I: No pain, off medications; II: Occasional pain, off medications; IIIa: No pain, continued use of medications; IIIb: Pain persists, but adequately controlled with medications; IV: Pain not adequately controlled with medications; V: No relief) will be used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment. Twelve months after the procedure, participants with Barrow Neurological Institute scores of I-III will be defined as having received effective treatment. The primary outcome will be the effectiveness of the treatment after 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity ScoreOn day 1; at 1 and 2 weeks; and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedureThe modified Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Score (I: No pain, off medications; II: Occasional pain, off medications; IIIa: No pain, continued use of medications; IIIb: Pain persists, but adequately controlled with medications; IV: Pain not adequately controlled with medications; V: No relief) will be used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment.
Numeric rating scaleOn day 1; at 1 and 2 weeks; and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedurePain was assessed after surgery by a numerical rating scale (0 indicates no pain, 10 indicates the most severe pain imaginable).
Patient satisfaction scores on the 5-point Likert scaleAfter 1, 6 and 12 months following the procedure1: poor, 2: fair, 3: good, 4: very good, 5: excellent
The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREFAfter 1, 6 and 12 months following the procedureQuality of life will be measured using the World Health Organisation QoL-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire. The WHOQOL-BREF is a abbreviated version of the WHOQOL-100 assessment. WHOQOL-BREF is a self-report questionnaire that contains 26 items and addresses 4 QOL domains: physical health (7 items), psychological health (6 items), social relationships (3 items) and environment (8 items). Two other items measure overall QOL and general health. Each domain's mean score can range between 4 and 20 and a higher score indicates a higher quality of life. The mean score of items within each domain is used to calculate the domain score. A transformation method converts domain scores to a 0-100 scale.
NumbnessOn day 1; at 1 and 2 weeks; and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedureThe Barrow Neurological Institute facial numbness scores (I: No facial numbness; II: Mild facial numbness, not bothersome; III: Facial Numbness, somewhat bothersome; IV: Facial numbness, very bothersome) will be used to evaluate the facial numbness.
Dose of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepineOn day 1; at 1 and 2 weeks; and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months following the procedureDose of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine per day (mg/day)
Number of participants with masticator weaknessWithin 12 months of the procedureOcclusal dysfunction or a lower degree of masseter muscle fullness on one side when biting hard.
Number of participants with corneal anesthesiaWithin 12 months of the procedureWhen touching the sclera with a cotton swab hair does not cause the eyelids to close quickly.
Number of participants with keratitisWithin 12 months of the procedureEye dryness and pain, photophobia, lacrimation, excess mucus and other conditions diagnosed as keratitis by an ophthalmologist
Number of participants with adverse reactionsWithin two weeks of the procedureNausea, vomiting, and facial hematoma during and after the procedure; headache, dizziness, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurring within two weeks of the procedure.
Number of participants with anesthesia dolorosaWithin 12 months of the procedureThe participant's facial sensation decreased, accompanied by pain

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026