Skip to content

Safety and Tolerability Ultra-high-caloric Food Supplements in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Safety and Tolerability of Fat-rich vs. Carbohydrate-rich High-caloric Food Supplements in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04172792
Acronym
TOLCAL
Enrollment
64
Registered
2019-11-21
Start date
2019-11-26
Completion date
2021-04-05
Last updated
2021-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Brief summary

The LIPCAL-ALS study (NCT02306590) has provided preliminary evidence that a high-caloric nutrition might prolong survival in fast-progressing ALS patients. Since increasing the amount of calories of the intervention might possibly increase the beneficial effect, the investigators seek to investigate whether an ultra-high caloric diet (UHCD), featuring the double amount of calories compared to LIPCAL-ALS, will be well tolerated by ALS patients and may serve as an intervention for a potential LIPCALII study. For this purpose, the investigators will compare two different UHCDs (one fat-rich and one carbohydrate-rich) with regard to safety and tolerability over a time frame of 4 weeks. A third group will receive the original diet from LIPCAL, and a fourth group will receive no intervention (control group).

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENThigh-caloric fatty diet

see arm/group description

see arm/group description

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTultra-high-caloric carbohydrate-rich diet

see arm/group description

Sponsors

Nutritia GmbH, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Albert Christian Ludolph, Prof.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) according to the revised version of the El Escorial criteria (Ludolph et al. 2015) * Slope of ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) of \>0.25 points per month at baseline visit based on the formula (48 - score at baseline visit) / (time between date of first symptom and baseline visit) * stable on standard therapy riluzole (100 mg/day) for at least 4 weeks * capable of thoroughly understanding all information given and giving full informed consent according to good clinical practice (GCP)

Exclusion criteria

* already taking any dietary supplements * participation in another clinical trial within the preceding 8 weeks * tracheostomy or assisted ventilation of any type which exceeds 23 hours per day * pregnancy or breast-feeding females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events4 weeksIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Laboratory values4 weeksIncidence of abnormalities in clinical laboratory assessments, vital signs and physical examinations

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eating Habits2 weeks; 4 weeksChange in eating habits as evaluated by a standardized questionnaire (Ulmer eating habits questionnaire); descriptive information and evaluation; no overall score
Taste of Intervention2 weeks; 4 weekstaste of intervention (visual analogous scale); values 1-9, higher values mean better taste
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events6 weeksIncidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (evaluation via phone call 2 weeks after intervention was finished)
Biomarkers4 weekschange of neurofilament light chains (NfL) in serum
ALSFRS-R4 weekschange of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) compared to baseline; values 0-48; higher values mean less impairment
Body Weight2 weeks; 4 weekschange of body weight compared to baseline
Appetite2 weeks; 4 weeksChange of Appetite-Score (Council of Nutrition appetite questionnaire, CNAQ) compared to baseline; values 8-40; higher values mean better appetite

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026