Skip to content

Comparison of Compact 3T, Conventional 3T, and 7T Scanners Using Task Based and Resting State fMRI

Comparison of Compact 3T, Conventional 3T, and 7T Scanners Using Task Based and Resting State fMRI

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04172428
Enrollment
10
Registered
2019-11-21
Start date
2021-02-09
Completion date
2021-03-15
Last updated
2021-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

Comparison of 3 MRI scanners.

Detailed description

Comparing the strengths and weaknesses of 3 different MRI scanners in their performance of a functional MRI (an MRI that shows which areas in the brain are active during some sort of task).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFunctional MRI (fMRI)

fMRI will be done on 3 separate MRI scanners to compare.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1\) Men and Women aged 18-55

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with safety contraindications to MRI scanning at 3T. 2. Patients unable to adequately perform the fMRI task due to physical, neurological, or cognitive disability. 3. Patients that demonstrate 3 mm or greater translational head motion during scanning of the fMRI rhyming task data sets. 4. Pregnant women. 5. Patients that have implanted medical devices or other safety contraindications for a 7T or 3T MRI exam.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Statistical maxima of fMRI language and motor area activations.Approximately 6 months after last subject is scannedFor the task-based fMRI comparison, a region of interest will be drawn around activation maps overlying Broca's and Wernicke's language areas as well as the hand motor area. The data regarding each of the three regions will be treated separately. The statistical maxima for functional activation within these areas will be measured and compared using the same areas and technique on the three scanner platforms to determine which is the highest. This will be performed using the PRISM software we already use clinically to interpret fMRI.
Signal to noise ratio assessment of resting state.Approximately 6 months after last subject is scannedFor the resting state fMRI comparison, a standard measurement of signal to noise ratio will be employed specifically using the default mode network. This data will be reported separately from the task based outcome #1 as they are unrelated. Because this is a ratio is has no units of measurement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuroradiologist preference for scanner array.Approximately 6 months after last subject is scannedTwo board certified neuroradiologists will simply rank the 3 different scanner platforms (3T, Compact 3T, or the 7T) from most to least preferred for interpreting language and motor task-based fMRI's. This will be their overall qualitative gestalt based on years of daily experience reading these types of studies.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026