Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of BFKB8488A Compared With Placebo in Participants With Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

A Phase II, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of BFKB8488A Compared With Placebo in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04171765
Acronym
BANFF
Enrollment
46
Registered
2019-11-21
Start date
2020-09-30
Completion date
2023-01-23
Last updated
2024-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of BFKB8488A compared to placebo in participants with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) placebo matched to BFKB8488A.

Participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) BFKB8488A.

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of NASH as documented through liver biopsy performed no more than 6 months before randomization, defined according to NASH CRN criteria along with a NASH CRN fibrosis score between F2 and F3 * Hepatic steatosis on MRI (\>= 8% average PDFF) prior to randomization

Exclusion criteria

* History of any liver disease other than NASH, except for resolved, self-limited illnesses such as Hepatitis A or E, and previous Hepatitis C * Weight gain \> 10% or loss \> 5% within 3 months prior to randomization * History of liver transplantation * Current or history of significant alcohol consumption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Week 52Resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is defined as a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis as determined by a central reader. Worsening of fibrosis is defined as any increase in NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) fibrosis stage as determined by a central reader.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Fibrosis of at Least One Stage, as Defined by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN), and no Worsening of NASH at Week 52Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Baseline, Week 16, Week 52
Proportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52Week 52

Countries

Belgium, France, Puerto Rico, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo by subcutaneous (SC) injection every two weeks (Q2W) for 52 weeks.
13
Fixed Dose 50 mg
Participants received 50 mg of SC fazpilodemab (BFKB8488A) Q2W for 52 weeks.
11
Fixed Dose 75 mg
Participants received 75 mg of SC fazpilodemab (BFKB8488A) Q2W for 52 weeks.
11
Fixed Dose 100 mg
Participants received 100 mg of SC fazpilodemab (BFKB8488A) Q2W for 52 weeks.
11
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event2010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0222
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor2000
Overall StudyWeek 58 visit missed0010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1003

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboFixed Dose 50 mgFixed Dose 75 mgFixed Dose 100 mgTotal
Age, Continuous48.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
57.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
55.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
51.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8
53.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants5 Participants3 Participants5 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants6 Participants8 Participants6 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants10 Participants9 Participants10 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants5 Participants5 Participants5 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 110 / 110 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 1311 / 119 / 1110 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 131 / 111 / 110 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52

Resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is defined as a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis as determined by a central reader. Worsening of fibrosis is defined as any increase in NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) fibrosis stage as determined by a central reader.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population was defined as all randomly allocated participants who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 5216.7 Percentage of Participants
Fixed Dose 50 mgProportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 5237.5 Percentage of Participants
Fixed Dose 75 mgProportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 5214.3 Percentage of Participants
Fixed Dose 100 mgProportion of Participants With NASH Resolution on Overall Histopathological Reading Without Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 5233.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 52

Population: The mITT population was defined as all randomly allocated participants who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Week 52 change from baseline-4.46 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 6.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Baseline20.15 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 6.35
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Week 16 change from baseline-3.47 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 2.28
Fixed Dose 50 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Week 16 change from baseline-8.20 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 8.58
Fixed Dose 50 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Baseline20.67 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 6.05
Fixed Dose 50 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Week 52 change from baseline-2.50 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 8.13
Fixed Dose 75 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Week 52 change from baseline-3.46 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 11.57
Fixed Dose 75 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Baseline19.30 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 3.99
Fixed Dose 75 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Week 16 change from baseline-2.23 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 9.05
Fixed Dose 100 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Week 16 change from baseline-10.25 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 4.76
Fixed Dose 100 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Baseline18.12 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 7.7
Fixed Dose 100 mgChange From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 52Week 52 change from baseline-3.53 percentage of hepatic fat fractionStandard Deviation 6.54
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Fibrosis of at Least One Stage, as Defined by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN), and no Worsening of NASH at Week 52

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The mITT population was defined as all randomly allocated participants who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Fibrosis of at Least One Stage, as Defined by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN), and no Worsening of NASH at Week 5216.7 Percentage of participants
Fixed Dose 50 mgProportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Fibrosis of at Least One Stage, as Defined by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN), and no Worsening of NASH at Week 5225.0 Percentage of participants
Fixed Dose 75 mgProportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Fibrosis of at Least One Stage, as Defined by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN), and no Worsening of NASH at Week 5228.6 Percentage of participants
Fixed Dose 100 mgProportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Fibrosis of at Least One Stage, as Defined by NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN), and no Worsening of NASH at Week 5216.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 52

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The mITT population was defined as all randomly allocated participants who received at least one dose of study drug or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 5216.7 Percentage of participants
Fixed Dose 50 mgProportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 5237.5 Percentage of participants
Fixed Dose 75 mgProportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 5242.9 Percentage of participants
Fixed Dose 100 mgProportion of Participants With Improvement in Liver Histology From Baseline and no Worsening of Fibrosis at Week 5233.3 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026