Skip to content

RMN Versus Manual Epicardial Retrospective PMCF

A Retrospective Multicenter Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Registry Comparing Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes of Epicardial Cardiac Ablation Using Remote Navigation to Manual Techniques

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04171479
Acronym
EPINAV
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-11-21
Start date
2020-10-02
Completion date
2023-03-30
Last updated
2023-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Premature Ventricular Contraction, Ventricular Tachycardia

Brief summary

Retrospective registry will compare subjects who've undergone a mapping and/or ablation procedure for either ischemic ventricular tachycardia or premature ventricular contraction using an epicardial approach with either manual or remote magnetic navigation. Subjects will be compared with regards to safety, efficacy and mortality.

Detailed description

Up to 10 centers in the European Union will be selected to conduct the trial. Once a site is a selected, receives local Ethics Committee approval, and receives Sponsor approval to enroll, the site will begin enrollment. All subjects must meet eligibility criteria and follow protocol and ethics committee requirements regarding informed consent prior to enrollment. Once a subject is enrolled, the site may begin reviewing the subject's medical records and entering data into the electronic data capture system. Once enrollment and retrospective data entry is complete at a site, a monitoring visit will occur where source data verification will occur.

Interventions

DEVICEEpicardial mapping and/or ablation

Either catheter mapping, ablation, or mapping and ablation will be performed using an epicardial catheter approach.

Sponsors

Stereotaxis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Have undergone an epicardial RF mapping and/or ablation for a ventricular tachycardia (VT) as standard of care treatment using either the Niobe MNS or a manual approach * Index procedure was conducted between July 1, 2013-present date.

Exclusion criteria

* NA, all subjects who meet inclusion criteria may be enrolled.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute Successintra-operativeCharacterize acute success rates for both groups. Acute success for VT procedures is defined as non-inducibility of clinical VT and/or other monomorphic VT at the end of the index-procedure. Acute success for PVC procedures is defined as no recurrence and non-inducibility of culprit PVC at the end of the index-procedure.
Procedural Safety: rates of device-and procedure-related serious adverse events48 hours post index procedureAssess rates of device-and procedure-related serious adverse events in both groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chronic Success1 year post index procedureCharacterize recurrence rates for both groups at 1 year post index procedure.
Chronic Safety: rates of device-or procedure-related serious adverse events1 year post index procedureCharacterize rates of device-or procedure-related serious adverse events for both groups at 1 year post index procedure.
Mortality1 year post index procedureAssess mortality rate for both groups

Countries

Czechia, Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026