Difficult Intubation
Conditions
Keywords
ultrasound, difficult airway, difficult intubation
Brief summary
Ultrasound has become an essential tool for the daily work of any doctor, but in certain specialties such as Anaesthesiology, its use has greatly increased the safety offered to patients throughout the perioperative period, either to perform nerve blocks, for vascular access, intraoperative hemodynamic management or any other use that allows increasing quality of care. The management of the upper airway and the diagnosis of pathological conditions are essential skills for any doctor especially for Anaesthesiologist, ER physician, or Intensive Care physician. Because an inadequate airway management continues to be an important contributor to patient mortality and morbidity, any tool that can improve it should be considered as an addition to conventional clinical evaluation. Unfortunately, most of the clinical parameters that should allow us to assess a potential difficult airway, do not always lead us to an adequate prediction, that is why US(Ultrasound) is use as an emerging tool in many fields, is also gathering strength in this search for a definitive predictor parameter. Ultrasound has many obvious advantages (safe,fast, repeatable, portable, widely available and gives dynamic images in real time). Sonographic studies are operator-dependent and although the identification of basic structures could be acquired with only a few hours of training, but more complex studies require a learning curve of months or even years. The high frequency linear probe (5-14 MHz) is probably the most suitable for the airway because images are of superficial structures (within 0-5 cm below the skin surface). The growing academic interest in the use of US to look for predictors of difficult airway is centred mainly on measurements at the level of pretracheal tissues. But the greatest limitation of these studies is the disparity of the fat distribution that exists between different ethnic groups and and sexes, and the lack of standardization method in patient´s intubation conditions. So, the investigator propose to assess different ultrasound windows at the level of pretracheal tissues such as independent predictors of Difficult Airway.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCompare clinical test with ultrasound parameters
Compare various clinical test with four ultrasound parameters to predict difficult intubation.
Sponsors
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients (male or female) ASA I-III, aged between 18 and 90 years, undergoing scheduled surgery requiring orotracheal intubation. The signature of the informed consent is required authorizing its inclusion in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Obesity class II defined as a BMI greater than 35. * Pregnant. * Cervical tumors, goiter or patients who have required radiotherapy at the cervical level * Abnormalities that condition anatomy alterations such as facial / cervical fractures. * Maxillofacial abnormalities * People who cannot give their consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior neck soft tissue thickness measured by ultrasound at hyoid bone | 5 minutes | Distance from skin to the midline of hyoid bone measure with lineal ultrasound probe |
| Anterior neck soft tissue thickness measured by ultrasound at thyrohyoid membrane | 5 minutes | Distance from skin to midline of epiglottis measure with lineal ultrasound probe |
| Anterior neck soft tissue thickness measured by ultrasound at anterior commissure of vocal cords | 5 minutes | Distance from skin to anterior commisure of vocal cords measure with lineal ultrasound probe |
| Anterior neck soft tissue thickness measured by ultrasound at thyrohyoid membrane. Preepiglottic Area. | 5 minutes | Calculated with distance from skin to midline of epiglottis and 1 centimeterto left and right side. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Lip Bite Test | 1 minute | upper lip bite criteria-class I = lower incisors can bite the upper lip above the vermilion line, class II = lower incisors can bite the upper lip below the vermilion line, and class III = lower incisors cannot bite the upper lip. Class I is the best for not to be a difficult intubation, class III means it´s posibble a difficult laryngoscopy. |
| Modified Mallampati Score | 1 minute | Class I: Soft palate, uvula, fauces, pillars visible. Class II: Soft palate, major part of uvula, fauces visible. Class III: Soft palate, base of uvula visible. Class IV: Only hard palate visible. Class I is better than Class IV for not to be a difficult intubation. |
| neck circumference | 1 minute | Using a flexible measuring tape in centimeters, neck circumference at the level of thethyroid cartilage will be measured |
| Thyromental distance | 1 minute | measured from the thyroid notch to the tip of the jaw with the head extended |
| Sternomental distance | 1 minute | the distance from the suprasternal notch to the mentum and is measured with the head fully extended on the neck and the mouth closed |
| Interincisor distance | 1 minute | DIstance in centimeters between fornt incisors |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed