Skip to content

Wellbeing and Stress Among Mobile Phone Dispatched Lay Responders

Wellbeing and Stress Among Lay Responders Dispatched to Suspected Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrests

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04165668
Enrollment
460
Registered
2019-11-18
Start date
2019-01-09
Completion date
2020-05-07
Last updated
2020-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-traumatic Stress, Stress, Psychological

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to provide detailed information on state of mind, psychological wellbeing and stress for lay responders dispatched to suspected OHCA via a mobile phone application. The Heartunner system is a mobile phone positioning system for dispatch of CPR-trained lay volunteers to nearby suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs). After downloading of a mobile phone application (The Heartrunner application), and given consent of participation, the lay responders are dispatched to nearby suspected OHCA. The lay responders are either dispatched directly to the scene of the suspected OHCA to perform CPR, or to fetch the nearest AED. The location of the OHCA and available AEDs are displayed on a map, facilitated by the Heartrunner application. The Heartrunner system is studied through The SAMBA-trial on clinical outcomes for OHCA patients (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02992873). The psychological effects among the lay responders will be evaluated with an online survey adjacent to dispatch and after 4-6 weeks. The results of the survey will be compared both intra-individual, and to a control group of not dispatched lay responders within the Heartrunner system. Descriptive statistics regarding interventions, age, gender and former experience will also be presented.

Detailed description

Please see the attacehd study protocol for details

Interventions

OTHERExposure: First on scene

To be first on scene for resuscitation at the suspected out-of hospital cardiac arrest, before EMS and first responders (fire and police services)

Sponsors

Region Stockholm
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Vastra Gotaland Region
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Uppsala University
CollaboratorOTHER
ESCAPE-NET investigators
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Mobile phone dispatched lay responders who reached the scene a suspected cardiac arrest. * Located lay responders who was not dispatched due to technical or human reasons (no feedback from app to system).

Exclusion criteria

* Mobile Phone Lay responders who declined the mission for dispatch to a suspected cardiac arrest. * Mobile Phone Lay responders that already answered the survey. * Mobile phone dispatched lay responders who accepted the mission but was aborted due to distance or did not reach the scene.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Level of stress at 4 weeksAt 90 minutes and 4 at weeksSwedish Core Affect Scale (SCAS);The measure of state of mind will be done on 12 affective scales of adjective pairs that range from 1-9. For example: anxious (1) to calm (9), pessimistic (1) to optimistic (9) etc. High numbers on adjectives indicating activation, as well as measures on Anxious, tense and nervous will be regarded as (negative) stress whereas Interested engaged and optimistic will be regarded as (positive) stress.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Level of post traumatic stress symptomsAt 90 minutes and 4 at weeksPCL checklist, short form with 6 items each ranging from 1 to 5. Max is 30 points and a positive screen is a score of ≥ 14 points.
Level of wellbeingAt 4 weeksWHO index, 5 questions each ranging from 5-1 with a maximum of 100 points were higher values indicate good wellbeing. A score below 14 indicates poor wellbeing.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026