Skip to content

Effect of Nose Selection Using Rhnoscope on Epistaxis of Nasotracheal Intubation

The Effect of Suitable Nose Selection Using Rhinoscope on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04164836
Enrollment
182
Registered
2019-11-15
Start date
2019-11-26
Completion date
2022-03-30
Last updated
2022-07-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasotracheal Intubation

Keywords

epistaxis, rhinoscope

Brief summary

Rhinoscope is useful to exam intranasal structure. This information could be utilized to select more suitable nose for nasotracheal intubation. Nastoracheal intubation using more patent nose could be associated with decrease of the development of epistaxis which is most common complication in nasotracheal intubation.

Detailed description

Anterior rhinoscopy using rhinoscope is a simple way to view the intranasal structure, which allows you to observe the nasal mucosa, the inferior nasal concha, and in some cases, the nasal concha. You can see the nasal septum, polyps, and intranasal malformations. In addition, even when there are no structural abnormalities in the nasal cavity, the wider nasal cavity can be intuitively identified. This information is expected to assist in the selection of nostrils. It has not yet been studied whether anesthesiologists select nasal cavity for nasotracheal intubation using prosthesis can affect the occurrence of epistaxis. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the selection of a nostril for nasotracheal intubation by rhinoscope affects the incidence and severity of epistaxis.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTrhinoscope

more suitable nose for nasotracheal intubation will be selected based on the view of rhinoscope.

Sponsors

Ajou University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA I or II undergoing surgery under nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

* expected difficult intubation based on history, physical examination, weight. * bleeding tendency * past history of nasal surgery * symptom of difficulty of nasal respiration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of epistaxisimmediate after intubationpercentage of the development of epistaxis after nasotracheal intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
severity of epistaxis4. severe: interfere intubation by bloodimmediate after intubationscore based on severity of epistaxis will be recorded. 1: no epistaxis, 2: mild; blood on tube 3. moderate: blood pooling on pharynx
severity of epistaxis5 min after intubationscore based on severity of epistaxis will be recorded. 1: no epistaxis, 2: mild; blood on tube 3. moderate: blood pooling on pharynx

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026