Skip to content

Functional Collagen Scaffold for Laryngeal Soft Tissue Regeneration

Clinical Study of Functional Collagen Scaffold Transplantation for Laryngeal Soft Tissue Regeneration

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04164485
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-11-15
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2019-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glottic Insufficiency

Brief summary

Unilateral vocal cord paralysis (UVCP) is a clinical condition and often leads to glottic insufficiency. The presence of glottic insufficiency can result in poor pronunciation quality, vocal fatigue, shortness of breath with speaking, and in some cases, it could lead to unable to pronounce, dysphagia and aspiration, severely decreasing quality of life for its victims. This study is carried out to explore the short-term and long-term efficacy of the functional collagen scaffold in guiding laryngeal soft tissue regeneration.

Interventions

Injectable collagen scaffold combined with autologous adipose-derived cells will be injected into submucosa of vocal cord and paraglottic space under the surgical microscope

BIOLOGICALAutologous adipose cell transplantation

Autologous adipose-derived cells will be injected into the submucosa of vocal cord and paraglottic space under the surgical microscope

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College
CollaboratorOTHER
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age of 18-65 years old, male or female 2. Unilateral vocal cord injury and poor closure of the glottis 3. Disease course was more than 1 year 4. At least two GRBAS scores reach 2 points or more 5. The subjects have read and fully understood the research notes, signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Over speaking professionals, such as teachers, shop assistants 2. With vital organ dysfunction, such as heart, lung, liver or kidney 3. With malignant tumors 4. Pregnant or lactating women, or in preconception period 5. History of drug allergy 6. Difficult to be followed-up or cooperate long-termly 7. Participated in other clinical trials in the last 3 months 8. With severe progressive diseases 9. Alcoholics or drug addicts 10. Unable to execute clinical study protocol due to severe mental disorders or lingual barriers 11. With inevitable circumstances of voice damage 12. Any other unsuitable conditions for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GRBAS scale1 week after interventionAuditory perceptual evaluation was assessed with a GRBAS scale, in which the voice properties, such as the grade of the severity of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S), are scored on a four-point scale: 0 = normal, 1 = slight deviance, 2 = moderate deviance, and 3 = severe deviance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Jitter1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after interventionAcoustic voice analysis parameter. Jitter is for short and middle term pitch perturbation analysis
Shimmer1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after interventionAcoustic voice analysis parameter. Shimmer is for short and middle term amplitude perturbation analysis
Normalized noise energy (NNE)1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after interventionAcoustic voice analysis parameter. Normalized Noise Energy (NNE) is automatically computed from the voice signals using an adaptive comb filtering method performed in the frequency domain
Voice handicap index (VHI) scale1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after interventionThe Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is a 30-item test divided into 3 subscales that measure the functional, physical and emotional features of the disability caused by voice impairment was used for patient self-assessment. The subscale scores ranged from 0 to 40, and the total ranged from 0 to 120, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of disability
Physical status of vocal cords1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 month after interventionThe morphology of vocal cords (thin or fat, smooth or rough, plump or atrophy), motor function of vocal cords (normal, limited or fixed) and glottic closure (yes or no) were observed by fiber laryngoscopy
Volume of vocal cordsBaseline, 1 year, 2 year after interventionThe volume of vocal cords was evaluated by Computed tomography (CT)
Maximum phonation time (MPT)1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 month after interventionAcoustic voice analysis parameter. Maximum phonation time (MPT) represents the maximum time that an individual can sustain the vowel /a/ at a comfortable pitch and loudness

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactZhifeng Xiao, Ph.D
zfxiao@genetics.ac.cn86-10-82614420
Backup ContactSufang Han, Ph.D
sufanghan22@genetics.ac.cn86-10-82614420

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026