Skip to content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Safe at Home Program

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Safe at Home Program

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04163549
Enrollment
404
Registered
2019-11-14
Start date
2019-11-19
Completion date
2021-09-20
Last updated
2022-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Child Abuse, Domestic Violence, Family Functioning

Brief summary

The goals of the pilot RCT examining the potential effectiveness of the Safe at Home program in DRC are to: 1. Determine the potential effectiveness of Safe at Home program on improvements of family functioning and secondary outcomes of reductions in intimate partner violence and child maltreatment 2. Determine the potential effectiveness of the Safe at Home program on changes in pathway outcomes such as attitudes towards harsh discipline, gender attitudes, power-sharing, positive parenting practices, etc.

Detailed description

For the pilot RTC, quantitative data will be collected from up to 420 individuals participating in the Safe at Home program in the North Kivu, DRC. The 420 individuals comprising the study population will be 210 couples, of which both the male and female partners will be asked to participate in the study. After baseline data collection is completed, within each of the four sites where the program will occur in North Kivu, DRC, two groups of couples will be formed (n=8 groups total). Each group will be formed based on geographical proximity and will mirror real-life implementation of the program and ensure high fidelity to program design and limit contamination or spillover of Safe at Home to the control groups. Groups will then be randomized to receive Safe at Home in Cycle 1 or be waitlisted to receive Safe at Home in Cycle 2. After randomization is completed the Cycle 1 programming will commence. Following a waiting period of 3 months after the program ends, the endline survey will be administered. Subsequently Cycle 2 cohort will receive programming.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSafe at Home

Discussion-based intervention

Sponsors

International Rescue Committee
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * registered for the Safe at Home program * living with intimate partner who is also registered for the program and at least one child aged 6-12 * speaker of Swahili, Kinyarwanda, or French

Exclusion criteria

includes: * \< 18 years of age * being of a polygamous household * not registered for program * obvious mental, or cognitive, or communication difficulties.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Family functioningThree months after intervention completionMean change in women's reports (primary) and men's reports of family functioning

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intimate partner violenceThree months after intervention completionFrequency change of past three month women's report of physical and/or sexual and/or emotional IPV (will also examine separately)
Harsh disciplineThree months after intervention completionFrequency change of past three month report of men's and women's physical or psychological harsh discipline practices against index child

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026