Skip to content

Tailored Response to Psychiatric Comorbidity to Improve HIV Care Engagement in the United States

Tailored Response to Psychiatric Comorbidity to Improve HIV Care Engagement in the United States

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04163341
Acronym
TRACE
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-11-14
Start date
2020-10-23
Completion date
2022-12-13
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Depression, HIV/AIDS, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, Substance Use Disorders

Brief summary

This pilot randomized clinical trial will randomize 60 participants 1:1 to either enhanced usual care or to adapted Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA), a counseling intervention for HIV care engagement plus depression, anxiety, PTSD, and/or substance use.

Detailed description

Patient participants in this study will be randomized 1:1 to either enhanced usual care or the adapted CETA intervention. Enhanced usual care will include provision of feedback about psychiatric diagnoses to the HIV provider and the clinic's behavioral health team for follow-up according to the clinic's standard care. Participants randomized to the adapted CETA arm will initiate CETA with the trained counselor. The number of CETA sessions will depend on the patient's presentation but will range from 7-13 weekly in-person 1-hour sessions.Before randomization, enrolled participants will complete a baseline assessment including sociodemographic information; self-reported health; standardized assessments of depressive, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress symptoms and substance use; and key related structural and psychosocial factors including housing stability,intimate partner violence (IPV), other violence in the home, coping, social support, and experiences of stigma related to mental health. Participants in the Enhanced Contact arm will complete a follow-up research assessment at 3 months post baseline.Participants in the adapted CETA arm will complete this assessment after the final CETA session,also expected to be at approximately 3 months post-baseline. All participants will complete a final research assessment at 9 months post-baseline (approximately 6 months post-treatment exit for those in the adapted CETA arm). These follow-up assessments will assess the same domains as the baseline assessment.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAdapted Common Elements Treatment Approach

The intervention is a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy approach to treating any combination of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, or substance use disorder that has been adapted the needs of adults with HIV and to additionally address HIV care engagement.

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER
Michael J Mugavero, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>= 18 years. 2. Patient receiving HIV care at University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) 1917 Clinic. 3. Elevated symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, or substance use disorder: At least one of the following: 1. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score \>= 10; 2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale score \>= 10; 3. Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) score \>= 33; 4. ASSIST score \>=11 for alcohol or \>=4 for any other substance 4. At risk for suboptimal HIV care engagement: At least one of the following: 1. Engaged in HIV care for the first time within the past 6 months; 2. Have an HIV RNA viral load \>1,000 copies/mL within the past 6 months; 3. Antiretroviral regimen was changed due to treatment failure within the past 6 months; 4. No-showed to an HIV primary care appointment within the past year. 5. Willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Non-English speaking 2. Unable to attend counseling sessions 3. Unwilling to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of RecruitmentDuration of recruitment phase (9 months)We defined feasibility as the total number of patients approached in order to accrue the final study sample size of n=60.
Client AcceptabilityAt treatment exit (approximately 9 months post-baseline)Client acceptability will be assessed via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire, with a minimum value of 8 and a maximum score of 32. A higher score indicates greater client acceptability.
FidelityAt the end of CETA completion or withdrawal, across all CETA participantsCounselor fidelity to CETA will be rated by the trainer based on the trainer's supervisory experience working with CETA counselors. After all CETA patients complete the study, the trainer will rate up to 5 cross-cutting aspects of CETA delivery and 13 CETA components targeting specific symptoms for fidelity. The trainer will rate the degree of confidence on a scale of 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Completely) that the counselor was routinely delivering each cross-cutting aspect or component of CETA with fidelity, for those aspects and components that the trainer had experience supervising the counselor in. The fidelity rating will be calculated separately for the 2 CETA counselors and reported as the mean score across the number of CETA aspects and components rated by the trainer. Higher scores indicate greater fidelity to CETA.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depressive Symptoms4 months post-baselinePatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; minimum score is 0, maximum score is 27, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.
Anxiety Symptoms4 months post-baselineGeneralized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) anxiety subscale score; minimum score is 0, maximum score is 21, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.
Number of Participants Suppressed HIV RNA Viral Load4 months post-baselineHIV RNA viral load \<200 copies/mL
Substance Use Symptoms4 months post-baselineThe Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST); each substance is scored separately. The minimum score is 0, maximum score is 39, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome. For this outcome, we will report substance use symptoms at 4 months post-baseline for the substance with the highest score at baseline only.
HIV Kept Visit AttendanceFrom baseline to 12 months post-baselineMean kept visit proportion: Total number of kept visits HIV clinical care visits divided by total number of missed plus kept HIV clinical care visits. For one individual: The numerator in this proportion is all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant attended from baseline to 12-months post-baseline.The denominator in this proportion is all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant attended plus all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant did not attend or 'missed' from baseline to 12-months post-baseline. For each arm: We calculated the mean kept visit proportion per study arm by adding each individual kept visit proportion and dividing by the total number of participants in each arm.
Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms4 months post-baselinePTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) (PCL-5); minimum score is 0, maximum score is 80, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.
Number of Participants With Suppressed HIV RNA Viral Load9 months post-baselineHIV RNA viral load \<200 copies/mL
HIV Appointment AttendanceFrom baseline to 12 months post-baselineHealth Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) attendance measure: Engaged in care if attended \>=2 HIV primary care visits \>= 90 days apart in the 12 months after baseline.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CETA Protocol
Adapted Common Elements Treatment Approach: The intervention is a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy approach to treating any combination of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, or substance use disorder that has been adapted the needs of adults with HIV and to additionally address HIV care engagement.
30
Enhanced Usual Care
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC): Usual care at the 1917 Clinic for patients with mental health concerns includes referral to a clinic social worker or counselor or to an external mental health clinic as needed. Usual care was enhanced by providing the participant's medical provider with information about the participant's elevated mental health symptoms at enrollment and recommendations for treatment.
30
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up34
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCETA ProtocolEnhanced Usual CareTotal
Age, Continuous39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
44.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
22 Participants23 Participants45 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 Participants30 Participants60 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Additional sex or gender
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
10 Participants12 Participants22 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Transgender Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Transgender Male
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Client Acceptability

Client acceptability will be assessed via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire, with a minimum value of 8 and a maximum score of 32. A higher score indicates greater client acceptability.

Time frame: At treatment exit (approximately 9 months post-baseline)

Population: Client acceptability was only measured for participants in the CETA arm since this outcome reflects their overall satisfaction with the intervention. This population includes the 25 participants who completed the exit interview \~9 months post-baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseClient Acceptability29.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Primary

Feasibility of Recruitment

We defined feasibility as the total number of patients approached in order to accrue the final study sample size of n=60.

Time frame: Duration of recruitment phase (9 months)

Population: The analysis population for this outcome measure (feasibility of recruitment) is larger than the study population as we included all patients approached for screening (n=92) to reach our study sample (n=60).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseFeasibility of Recruitment92 participants
Primary

Fidelity

Counselor fidelity to CETA will be rated by the trainer based on the trainer's supervisory experience working with CETA counselors. After all CETA patients complete the study, the trainer will rate up to 5 cross-cutting aspects of CETA delivery and 13 CETA components targeting specific symptoms for fidelity. The trainer will rate the degree of confidence on a scale of 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Completely) that the counselor was routinely delivering each cross-cutting aspect or component of CETA with fidelity, for those aspects and components that the trainer had experience supervising the counselor in. The fidelity rating will be calculated separately for the 2 CETA counselors and reported as the mean score across the number of CETA aspects and components rated by the trainer. Higher scores indicate greater fidelity to CETA.

Time frame: At the end of CETA completion or withdrawal, across all CETA participants

Population: The analysis population includes the total number of clients assigned to each counselor.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseFidelity3.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Enhanced Usual CareFidelity3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Anxiety Symptoms

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) anxiety subscale score; minimum score is 0, maximum score is 21, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame: 4 months post-baseline

Population: The analysis population includes all participants with a completed interview at 4 months post-baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseAnxiety Symptoms10.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Enhanced Usual CareAnxiety Symptoms9.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Secondary

Depressive Symptoms

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score; minimum score is 0, maximum score is 27, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame: 4 months post-baseline

Population: The analysis population includes all participants with a completed interview at 4 months post-baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseDepressive Symptoms11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Enhanced Usual CareDepressive Symptoms9.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Secondary

HIV Appointment Attendance

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) attendance measure: Engaged in care if attended \>=2 HIV primary care visits \>= 90 days apart in the 12 months after baseline.

Time frame: From baseline to 12 months post-baseline

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseHIV Appointment Attendance22 Participants
Enhanced Usual CareHIV Appointment Attendance22 Participants
Secondary

HIV Kept Visit Attendance

Mean kept visit proportion: Total number of kept visits HIV clinical care visits divided by total number of missed plus kept HIV clinical care visits. For one individual: The numerator in this proportion is all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant attended from baseline to 12-months post-baseline.The denominator in this proportion is all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant attended plus all the scheduled HIV clinical care visits a participant did not attend or 'missed' from baseline to 12-months post-baseline. For each arm: We calculated the mean kept visit proportion per study arm by adding each individual kept visit proportion and dividing by the total number of participants in each arm.

Time frame: From baseline to 12 months post-baseline

Population: Analysis population includes all participants with data on their total number of HIV care visits collected from baseline to 12 months post-baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseHIV Kept Visit Attendance0.74 Proportion of HIV care visitsStandard Deviation 0.27
Enhanced Usual CareHIV Kept Visit Attendance0.70 Proportion of HIV care visitsStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Number of Participants Suppressed HIV RNA Viral Load

HIV RNA viral load \<200 copies/mL

Time frame: 4 months post-baseline

Population: The analysis population includes all participants with a collected 4-month viral load.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseNumber of Participants Suppressed HIV RNA Viral Load13 Participants
Enhanced Usual CareNumber of Participants Suppressed HIV RNA Viral Load18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Suppressed HIV RNA Viral Load

HIV RNA viral load \<200 copies/mL

Time frame: 9 months post-baseline

Population: This analysis population includes all participants with a completed viral load at 9 months post-baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseNumber of Participants With Suppressed HIV RNA Viral Load17 Participants
Enhanced Usual CareNumber of Participants With Suppressed HIV RNA Viral Load17 Participants
Secondary

Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms

PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) (PCL-5); minimum score is 0, maximum score is 80, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Time frame: 4 months post-baseline

Population: The analysis population includes all participants with a completed interview at 4 months post-baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhasePost-traumatic Stress Symptoms33.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
Enhanced Usual CarePost-traumatic Stress Symptoms28.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Secondary

Substance Use Symptoms

The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST); each substance is scored separately. The minimum score is 0, maximum score is 39, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome. For this outcome, we will report substance use symptoms at 4 months post-baseline for the substance with the highest score at baseline only.

Time frame: 4 months post-baseline

Population: The analysis population includes all participants with a completed interview at 4 months post-baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Arm Assignment in Screening PhaseSubstance Use Symptoms10.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Enhanced Usual CareSubstance Use Symptoms7.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026