Skip to content

5-Year Follow-Up Safety and Performance Evaluation of the Medtentia Annuloplasty Ring in Adults

Evaluation of the 5-Year Safety and Performance of the Medtentia Annuloplasty Ring in Adults - Follow-Up to Clinical Investigation 2010-040

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04161079
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-11-13
Start date
2019-11-08
Completion date
2020-01-29
Last updated
2020-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mitral Insufficiency, Mitral Regurgitation

Keywords

Mitral valve, Mitral surgery, Mitral repair, Mitral annuloplasty, Mitral valve surgery, Mitral valve repair, Mitral valve annuloplasty

Brief summary

Single-center clinical investigation is to evaluate long-term safety and performance of the Medtentia Annuloplasty Ring (MAR) in 11 patients who underwent successful mitral valve (MV) surgery using Medtentia's MAR system in clinical investigation 2010-040 performed during June 2011 - April 2016.

Interventions

DEVICEMedtentia Annuloplasty Ring (MAR)

Mitral valve repair using the MAR performed in clinical investigation 2010-040

Sponsors

Medtentia International Ltd Oy
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed Informed Consent Form. * Subject had a successful MAR implantation in clinical investigation 2010-040. * Subject is willing to participate in the follow-up study and to comply with the requirements of the Clinical Investigation Plan.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who participated in the clinical investigation 2010-040 but had the MAR replaced with another mitral valve repair ring or system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety: the Occurrence, Nature and Frequency of Significant Medical Eventssince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure
Performance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)from 2-year follow-up data point to more than 5 years post-procedureSuccess will be defined as no change or any improvement in MR class as described in the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guidelines

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety: the Occurrence, Nature and Frequency of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) and/or Device Deficienciessince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure
Safety: Number of Cardiovascular Admissionssince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure
Safety: the Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findingsday of study visitThe number of subjects with clinically significant abnormal findings in TTE, electrocardiography (ECG), or vital signs and type of abnormal findings will be listed and tabulated
Performance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up Visitsince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedureDefined as assessment of NYHA functional class status at clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year follow-up visit and at this investigation visit more than 5 years post-procedure Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Performance: Number of Subjects With Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitationsince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedureRecurrence of mitral regurgitation is defined as changing of mitral regurgitation to moderate or severe according to ACC/AHA classification determined by TTE
Performance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Coaptation Height), as Measured by TTEsince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedureChange from the clinical investigation 2010-040 2-year follow-up in the coaptation height, as measured by TTE
Performance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling), as Measured by TTEsince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedureChange from the clinical investigation 2010-040 2-year follow-up in the following MR parameters, as measured by TTE: \- Left ventricle reverse remodeling: left ventricular inner dimension systole and diastole (the dimension of inner edge to inner edge, perpendicular to the long axis of the left ventricle, at the level of the mitral valve leaflet tips, measured at end-systole and end-diastole)
Safety: All-Cause Mortalitysince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedureCollected retrospectively

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Re-operation or Mitral Valve Reintervention Due MAR Performance Failure or Malfunctionsince the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure
Quality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© Questionnaireday of study visit15D© questionnaire investigates the standard of quality of life (QOL15D) through a general health assessment and not specific to a particular disease or age. It is a 15-domain (mobility, vision, hearing, breathing, sleeping, eating, speech, excretion, usual activities, mental function, discomfort and symptoms, depression, distress, vitality and sexual activity) questionnaire. Each domain score ranges from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems), with lower scores reflecting better health-related functional status.

Countries

Finland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Each MAR patient attended a single visit at the investigational site Mehiläinen hospital, Helsinki, during the period from 08 Nov 2019 to 29 Jan 2020. Maximum of 11 MAR patients who underwent successful MAR implantation and completed 2010-040 clinical investigation were anticipated to be qualifying for this follow-up clinical investigation.

Pre-assignment details

This follow up investigation compared 5-year timepoint data with the 2-year results of 2010-040 investigation, therefore enrollment numbers differ in the Protocol Section (7) and in the Participant Flow (12). 7 MAR patients returned for 2010-040FU5 follow-up visit and 3 of these were with MAR Classic, 1 with MAR Regular and 3 with MAR Expanded.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MAR Population
Baseline data was presented for this follow-up clinical investigation 2010-040FU5 population (7 participants) which included participants who underwent MV repair operation with successful MAR implantation in clinical investigation 2010-040 and were enrolled in this follow-up clinical investigation 2010-040FU5. Medtentia Annuloplasty Ring (MAR): Mitral valve repair using the MAR performed in clinical investigation 2010-040.
7
Total7

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Clinical Investigation 2010-040Adverse Event1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMAR Population
Age, Continuous73.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.96
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 110 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Performance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)

Success will be defined as no change or any improvement in MR class as described in the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Guidelines

Time frame: from 2-year follow-up data point to more than 5 years post-procedure

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MAR PopulationPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)I - None/Trivial8 Participants
MAR PopulationPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)II - Mild3 Participants
MAR PopulationPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)III - Moderate0 Participants
MAR PopulationPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)IV - Severe0 Participants
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)IV - Severe0 Participants
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)I - None/Trivial5 Participants
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)III - Moderate0 Participants
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) as Measured by Trans-Thoracic Echocardiography (TTE)II - Mild2 Participants
Primary

Safety: the Occurrence, Nature and Frequency of Significant Medical Events

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MAR PopulationSafety: the Occurrence, Nature and Frequency of Significant Medical Events0 Events
Secondary

Performance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Coaptation Height), as Measured by TTE

Change from the clinical investigation 2010-040 2-year follow-up in the coaptation height, as measured by TTE

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

Population: At clinical investigation 2010-040 2-year follow-up timepoint data was available for 9 of 11 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MAR PopulationPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Coaptation Height), as Measured by TTE7.4 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.3
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Coaptation Height), as Measured by TTE3.9 millimetersStandard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

Performance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling), as Measured by TTE

Change from the clinical investigation 2010-040 2-year follow-up in the following MR parameters, as measured by TTE: \- Left ventricle reverse remodeling: left ventricular inner dimension systole and diastole (the dimension of inner edge to inner edge, perpendicular to the long axis of the left ventricle, at the level of the mitral valve leaflet tips, measured at end-systole and end-diastole)

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MAR PopulationPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling), as Measured by TTELeft Ventricular Inner Dimension Systole38 millimeters
MAR PopulationPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling), as Measured by TTELeft Ventricular Inner Dimension Diastole51 millimeters
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling), as Measured by TTELeft Ventricular Inner Dimension Systole41 millimeters
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Change in Mitral Regurgitation Parameters (Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling), as Measured by TTELeft Ventricular Inner Dimension Diastole56 millimeters
Secondary

Performance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up Visit

Defined as assessment of NYHA functional class status at clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year follow-up visit and at this investigation visit more than 5 years post-procedure Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MAR PopulationPerformance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up VisitClass I11 Participants
MAR PopulationPerformance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up VisitClass II0 Participants
MAR PopulationPerformance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up VisitClass III0 Participants
MAR PopulationPerformance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up VisitClass IV0 Participants
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up VisitClass IV0 Participants
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up VisitClass I1 Participants
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up VisitClass III0 Participants
2010-040FU5 >5 Years Follow-upPerformance: Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification When Compared to the Clinical Investigation 2010-040 2-year Follow-Up VisitClass II6 Participants
Secondary

Performance: Number of Subjects With Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitation

Recurrence of mitral regurgitation is defined as changing of mitral regurgitation to moderate or severe according to ACC/AHA classification determined by TTE

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MAR PopulationPerformance: Number of Subjects With Recurrence of Mitral Regurgitation0 Participants
Secondary

Safety: All-Cause Mortality

Collected retrospectively

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

Population: All-cause mortality data was collected retrospectively since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040. During the course of the recruitment it became known that one MAR patient had died and it accounted for 9% of all-cause mortality rate in all 11 MAR patients. The cause of death was noncardiac-related and was not attributed to MAR.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MAR PopulationSafety: All-Cause Mortality1 Participants
Secondary

Safety: Number of Cardiovascular Admissions

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MAR PopulationSafety: Number of Cardiovascular Admissions0 Cardiovascular Admissions
Secondary

Safety: the Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings

The number of subjects with clinically significant abnormal findings in TTE, electrocardiography (ECG), or vital signs and type of abnormal findings will be listed and tabulated

Time frame: day of study visit

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MAR PopulationSafety: the Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings0 Participants
Secondary

Safety: the Occurrence, Nature and Frequency of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) and/or Device Deficiencies

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
MAR PopulationSafety: the Occurrence, Nature and Frequency of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) and/or Device Deficiencies0 Events
Other Pre-specified

Number of Subjects With Re-operation or Mitral Valve Reintervention Due MAR Performance Failure or Malfunction

Time frame: since the last visit of clinical investigation 2010-040 to more than 5 years post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MAR PopulationNumber of Subjects With Re-operation or Mitral Valve Reintervention Due MAR Performance Failure or Malfunction0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Quality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© Questionnaire

15D© questionnaire investigates the standard of quality of life (QOL15D) through a general health assessment and not specific to a particular disease or age. It is a 15-domain (mobility, vision, hearing, breathing, sleeping, eating, speech, excretion, usual activities, mental function, discomfort and symptoms, depression, distress, vitality and sexual activity) questionnaire. Each domain score ranges from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems), with lower scores reflecting better health-related functional status.

Time frame: day of study visit

Population: Response for quality of life scores for sexual activity domain of 15D© questionnaire received from 6 patients.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vitality30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vitality40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Hearing50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Distress50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vitality12 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vitality25 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mobility15 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mobility22 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mobility30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mobility40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mobility50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vision15 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vision22 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vision30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vision40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vision50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Hearing15 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Hearing22 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Hearing30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Hearing40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Breathing13 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Breathing24 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Breathing30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Breathing40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Breathing50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sleeping15 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sleeping21 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sleeping31 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sleeping40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sleeping50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Eating17 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Eating20 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Eating30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Eating40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Eating50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Speech16 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Speech21 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Speech30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Speech40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Speech50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Excretion16 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Excretion21 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Excretion30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Excretion40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Excretion50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Usual activities14 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Usual activities23 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Usual activities30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Usual activities40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Usual activities50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mental function13 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mental function24 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mental function30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mental function40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Mental function50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Discomfort and symptoms14 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Discomfort and symptoms23 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Discomfort and symptoms30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Discomfort and symptoms40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Discomfort and symptoms50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Depression14 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Depression23 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Depression30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Depression40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Depression50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Distress14 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Distress23 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Distress30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Distress40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Vitality50 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sexual activity13 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sexual activity23 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sexual activity30 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sexual activity40 Participants
MAR PopulationQuality of Life Scores as Measured by the 15D© QuestionnaireQOL15D-Sexual activity50 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026