Cancer of Colon, Cancer of Rectum, Patient Activation, Patient Empowerment, Self Care
Conditions
Brief summary
The prevalence of malnutrition is common among patients with colorectal cancer. Chemotherapy induced side effects may impact negatively on nutrition intake thus increase the risk of malnutrition and serious complications for patients. Purpose is to test the effect of empowering education on activation and knowledge level among patients with colorectal cancer during the chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and malnutrition. A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures is used to measure the effectiveness of face-to-face education on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care compared to standard care. Eligibility criteria are adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and receiving intra venous chemotherapy treatment. Patients are recruited in one university hospital outpatient clinic in Finland. Experienced oncology nurse delivers the intervention two weeks after the first chemotherapy. Primary outcomes are activation in self-care and knowledge level. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and risk of malnutrition measured at baseline (M0) and after eight (M1) and 16 weeks (M2) after the intervention. The study will provide knowledge of nurse-led educational intervention on self-care among patients with colorectal cancer. The findings will contribute to patient education and self-care, thus better quality of life.
Detailed description
The prevalence of malnutrition is common among patients with colorectal cancer. Chemotherapy induced side effects (nausea, vomiting, pain, mouth sores, fatigue, diarrhea, constipation, distress) may impact negatively on nutrition intake thus increase the risk of malnutrition thus serious complications for patients. Nurse-led empowering education may have positive effect on activation and knowledge level and enhance self-care of this patient group. Studies of nurse-led interventions that may enhance nutrition intake are scarce. Therefore, purpose of this study is to test the effect of educational nursing intervention on activation and knowledge level among patients with colorectal cancer during the chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and risk of malnutrition. A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures is used to measure the effectiveness of face-to-face education on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care compared to standard care. Eligibility criteria are adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and receiving intra venous chemotherapy treatment. Patients are recruited in one university hospital outpatient clinic in Finland. Experienced oncology nurse delivers the intervention two weeks after the first chemotherapy. Primary outcomes are activation in self-care and knowledge level. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and malnutrition risk measured at baseline (M0) and after eight (M1) and 16 weeks (M2) after the intervention. The study will provide knowledge of the effectiveness of nurse-led empowering educational intervention on self-care related to chemotherapy-induced side effects that may deteriorate nutrition intake among patients with colorectal cancer. The findings will contribute to patient education and self-care, thus better quality of life.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALEducational nursing intervention on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care among the patients with colorectal cancer
This is an educational intervention which aims to answer the questions: 1. In patients with CRC what is the effect of empowering education versus standard education on knowledge level in 4 months follow-up? 2. In patients with CRC what is the effect of empowering education versus standard education on activation level related to nutrition impact side effects' self-care in 4 months follow-up? 3. In patients with CRC what is the effect of empowering education versus standard education on malnutrition risk in 4 months follow-up? 4. In patients with CRC what is the effect of empowering education versus standard education on QoL in 4 months follow-up?
Sponsors
Helsinki University Central Hospital
University of Turku
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Masking description
Participants are blinded after assignment to interventions, those in intervention and control groups are not aware which treatment they get.
Intervention model description
A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* able to speak and understand Finnish * receiving chemotherapy every three weeks in outpatient clinic: oxaliplatin+capecitabine= Xelox; irinotecan + capecitabine = Xeliri; Xelox or Xeliri + Bevacizumab
Exclusion criteria
* weak physical, psychological or cognitive function that prevents participation * not able to understand Finnish
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The rate of knowledge level (Knowledge test of malnutrition, nutrition impact side effects and their self-care, RasOma, Tuominen et al. 2019) | From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention | Knowledge is seen as essential for empowerment (Rankinen et al. 2014; Castro et al. 2016). It is assumed that knowledge level is better in the intervention group compared to control group. Knowledge test was developed in the research group, which included an oncologist, a dietitian, oncology nurses and a researcher. The instrument includes 15 items (yes/no, right answer=1 point, wrong answer=0 points). |
| The rate of self care activation (Patient Activation Measure PAM, Insignia Health; Hibbard et al. 2004) | From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention | Activated individuals have the knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage their health. PAM shows how ready, willing and able an individual is to manage his or her health and healthcare.It is assumed that patients in the intervention group are more activated to self-care their side effects. The activation score is based on a 0-100 point scale. A change of 3-4 points is associated with the difference between engaging and not engaging in particular behaviors. Activation self care is rated from 1 to 4 (1= low activation level; believing the patient role is important, 2=low activation level; having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, 3=moderate activation level; actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and 4=high activation level; staying the course even in stressful situations)(InsigniaHealth 2017). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The incidence of malnutrition risk (Nutritional Risk Screening NRS2002, Kondrup et al. 2003) | From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after hte intervention | Nutrition consultations have affected positively on patients' food intake and nutritional status (Kiss & Krishnasamy 2014; Tu et al. 2013; Ravasco 2011, 2012). Patients with a total score of ≥3 are classified as nutritionally at risk. It is assumed that malnutrition risk is lesser in the intervention group compared to control group. |
| The rate of quality of life (The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - Colorectal, FACT-C, Cella et al. 1993) | From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention | The risk of malnutrition is strongly associated with QoL in cancer patients initiating chemotherapy (Calderon et al. 2018).The FACT-C questionnaire consists of 36 items on a 5-point Likert scale in four areas of well-being: physical (0-28 points), social (0-28 points), emotional (0-24 points), functional (0-28 points) and CRC subscale (0-28 points). Higher score means better QoL (34 points=low level, 34-68 points= satisfactory, 68-102 points=average and 102-136 points=high)(Ganesh et al. 2016; Goździewicz et al. 2017). |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of interruption, transfer and cancellation of the treatments | From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention | Better nutritional status is related to better treatment effect and better well-being, which may lead to better adherence to treatment schedule (Ravasco et al. 2012). Data is collected from patients' records. |
| Incidence of morbidity | From the baseline to 16 weeks after hte intervention | Worse nutritional status is related to greater morbidity (Ravasco et al. 2012). Data is collected from patients' records. |
Countries
Finland
Outcome results
None listed