Skip to content

A Study of TAK-079 in People With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of TAK-079 in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04159805
Enrollment
36
Registered
2019-11-12
Start date
2020-01-14
Completion date
2022-07-12
Last updated
2023-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myasthenia Gravis

Keywords

Drug therapy

Brief summary

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune condition that causes muscle weakness. Autoimmune means the body makes antibodies that attack its own cells and tissues. These types of antibodies are also known as autoantibodies. People with generalized myasthenia gravis have a weakness in many muscles. TAK-079 is a medicine to help people with generalized myasthenia gravis. The main aim of this study is to check if people with generalized myasthenia gravis have side effects from 2 doses of TAK-079. Other aims are to learn if TAK-079 improves their clinical condition and lowers their autoantibody levels. At the first visit, the study doctor will check if each person can take part. For those who can take part, participants will continue with their standard medicines for this condition during the study. Each participant will have a check-up by the study doctor. Then, the participants will have 1 of 3 treatments: * A low dose of TAK-079. * A high dose of TAK-079. * A placebo. In this study, a placebo looks like TAK-079 but does not have any medicine in it. Participants will not know which treatment they received, nor will their study doctors. This is to help make sure the results are more reliable. For each treatment, participants will receive injections just under the skin, once a week for 8 weeks. The study doctors will check for side effects from the study treatments. The study doctors can stop or delay the injections in each participant if needed. Then, the study doctors will continue to check for side effects for up to 24 weeks after treatment. They will also check the clinical condition of the participants, including their autoantibody levels.

Detailed description

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder in which autoantibodies, such as those targeting the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) or muscle specific kinase (MuSK), interfere with neuromuscular transmission, resulting in fatigue and weakness. The drug being tested in this study is called TAK-079. TAK-079 is being tested to treat people who have generalized myasthenia gravis.

Interventions

TAK-079 subcutaneous injection

TAK-079 placebo-matching subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis (MG) supported by a positive serologic test for anti-AChR or anti-MuSK antibodies at screening. 2. Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification II to IV at screening. 3. Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total score of 6 or greater at screening, with at least 4 points attributed to nonocular items. 4. If receiving immunosuppressive drugs (ie, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide), therapy must be ongoing for at least 6 months, with stable dosing ongoing for at least 3 months before screening. Participants receiving azathioprine must be on a stable dose for at least 6 months before screening. 5. If receiving oral corticosteroids, therapy must be ongoing for at least 3 months, with a stable dose at least 1 month before screening. Corticosteroids, including dexamethasone, must be given as oral, daily or every-other-day therapy, as opposed to pulse therapy. 6. If receiving cholinesterase inhibitors, therapy with a stable dose is required at least 2 weeks before screening. 7. The doses of concomitant standard background therapy must be expected to remain stable throughout the study unless dose reduction is required due to toxicities. Allowed background therapy is defined as no more than a cholinesterase inhibitor ± corticosteroid ± 1 steroid-sparing immunosuppressive drug (limited to azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, or cyclophosphamide). Participants must be on at least one allowed background medication. Main

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of a thymoma (previous history of a fully encapsulated thymoma removed ≥ 12 months before screening is allowed) or history of invasive thymic malignancy unless deemed cured by adequate treatment with no evidence of recurrence for ≥ 5 years before screening. 2. History of thymectomy within 12 months before screening. 3. MGFA class I or V. 4. Received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg), or plasmapheresis/plasma exchange within 4 weeks before screening, or an expectation that any therapy besides the participants standard background therapies may be used for treatment of MG (eg, a rescue therapy) between screening and dosing. 5. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma with a pre-bronchodilatory forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \<50% of predicted normal. Note: FEV1 testing is required for participants suspected of having COPD or asthma. 6. Received rituximab, belimumab, eculizumab, or any monoclonal antibody for immunomodulation within 6 months before first dosing. Participants with prior exposure to rituximab must have CD19 counts within the normal range at screening. 7. Known autoimmune disease other than MG that could interfere with the course and conduct of the study. 8. Received a live vaccine within 4 weeks before screening or has any live vaccination planned during the study. 9. Opportunistic infection ≤12 weeks before initial study dosing or currently receiving treatment for a chronic opportunistic infection, such as tuberculosis (TB), pneumocystis pneumonia, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, herpes zoster, or atypical mycobacteria. A mild, localized herpes simplex infection within 12 weeks of study dosing is allowed, as long as the lesion has resolved without systemic therapy prior to Day 1.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationFrom signing the informed consent form up to end of long-term follow-up (up to Week 32)AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participant administered drug; it does not necessarily have to have causal relationship with this treatment. TEAE is defined as AE with onset that occurs after receiving study drug. SAE is an adverse event resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Severity of TEAEs was graded using National cancer institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03 definitions of Grade 1 through Grade 5 wherein Grade 1=mild symptoms, Grade 2=moderate symptoms, Grade 3=Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, Grade 4=life-threatening consequences and Grade 5=death related to AEs. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at single decimal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreBaseline up to Week 32Physician-reported scale to assess MG disease severity by quantifying several body functions by physical exam. Each question is graded on a 4-point scale from 0=normal to 3=severe with a total score of 0 to 39; the higher score indicates greater disease burden. Negative change indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreBaseline up to Week 32An assessment scale of MG disease activity based on a combination of participant- and physician-reported items. Items are scored based on 4 potential levels of impact: normal, mild, moderate, or severe with a total score of 0 to 50; the higher score indicates worse MG disease activity. Negative change indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreBaseline up to Week 32A participant-reported score that assesses the participant's perception of impairment and disability and the degree to which the participant tolerates disease manifestations. Each question is graded on a 3-point scale from 0=normal to 2=severe with a total score of 0 to 30; the higher score indicates worse MG disease activity. Negative change indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsBaseline up to Week 32Clinical laboratory evaluations of anti-AChR antibodies were tested to monitor disease activity. MMRM was used for the analysis.
Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreBaseline up to Week 32Participant-reported scale to assess MG symptoms to evaluate capacity to perform activities of daily living. Each question is graded on a 4-point scale from 0=normal to 3=severe with a total score of 0 to 24; the higher score indicates greater functional impairment and disability. Negative change indicates improvement. Mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for the analysis.
Percentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreAt Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32The percentage of responders with at least a 2-point reduction in MG-ADL total score from baseline is reported. MG-ADL is a participant-reported scale to assess MG symptoms to evaluate capacity to perform activities of daily living. Each question is graded on a 4-point scale from 0=normal to 3=severe with a total score of 0 to 24; the higher score indicates greater functional impairment and disability. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.
Percentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreAt Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32The percentage of responders with at least a 3-point reduction in QMG total score from baseline is reported. QMG is a physician-reported scale to assess MG disease severity by quantifying several body functions by physical exam. Each question is graded on a 4-point scale from 0=normal to 3=severe with a total score of 0 to 39; the higher score indicates greater disease burden. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.
Percentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreAt Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32The percentage of responders with at least a 3-point reduction in MGC total score from baseline is reported. MGC is an assessment scale of MG disease activity based on a combination of participant- and physician-reported items. Items are scored based on 4 potential levels of impact: normal, mild, moderate, or severe with a total score of 0 to 50; the higher score indicates worse MG disease activity. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.
Change From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsBaseline up to Week 32Clinical laboratory evaluations of anti-MuSK antibodies were tested to monitor disease activity. Data is reported for participants who were positive for anti-MuSK antibodies at baseline.

Countries

Canada, Italy, Poland, Serbia, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 15 investigative sites in the United States, Spain, Poland, Serbia, and Canada from 14 January 2020 to 12 July 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis (MG) were enrolled in 1:1:1 ratio to receive TAK-079 matching placebo, TAK-079 300 mg or TAK-079 600 mg in combination with standard background therapy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TAK-079 Placebo-matching
TAK-079 placebo-matching injection, SC, once weekly in combination with standard background therapy for 8 weeks.
12
TAK-079 300 mg
TAK-079 300 mg injection, SC, once weekly in combination with standard background therapy for 8 weeks.
12
TAK-079 600 mg
TAK-079 600 mg injection, SC, once weekly in combination with standard background therapy for 8 weeks.
12
Total36

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject022

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalTAK-079 Placebo-matchingTAK-079 300 mgTAK-079 600 mg
Age, Continuous49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.54
46.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.03
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.47
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.42
Body Mass Index (BMI)29.76 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.855
31.33 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.867
27.74 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.852
30.22 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.315
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants9 Participants12 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Height170.48 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.511
164.67 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.435
175.39 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.911
171.38 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.91
Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale Score at Baseline8.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
7.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78
9.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.49
8.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23
Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale Score at Baseline15.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.03
14.7 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
16.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.58
15.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score at Baseline12.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.28
11.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.21
12.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.47
12.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.26
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
33 Participants10 Participants12 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
17 Participants5 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
4 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale Score at Baseline14.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.67
11.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.15
17.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.76
13.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.72
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants9 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants3 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Weight86.59 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.568
85.11 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.607
86.28 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.132
88.38 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.672

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 129 / 1211 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 121 / 121 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 Discontinuation

AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participant administered drug; it does not necessarily have to have causal relationship with this treatment. TEAE is defined as AE with onset that occurs after receiving study drug. SAE is an adverse event resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Severity of TEAEs was graded using National cancer institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03 definitions of Grade 1 through Grade 5 wherein Grade 1=mild symptoms, Grade 2=moderate symptoms, Grade 3=Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, Grade 4=life-threatening consequences and Grade 5=death related to AEs. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at single decimal.

Time frame: From signing the informed consent form up to end of long-term follow-up (up to Week 32)

Population: Safety Analysis Set included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationTEAE66.7 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationSAE8.3 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationGrade 3 or Higher TEAEs16.7 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationAE Leading to TAK-079 Discontinuation0.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationAE Leading to TAK-079 Discontinuation0.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationTEAE75.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationGrade 3 or Higher TEAEs8.3 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationSAE8.3 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationAE Leading to TAK-079 Discontinuation0.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationSAE8.3 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationGrade 3 or Higher TEAEs8.3 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs, and Adverse Event (AE) Leading to TAK-079 DiscontinuationTEAE91.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody Levels

Clinical laboratory evaluations of anti-AChR antibodies were tested to monitor disease activity. MMRM was used for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 12-0.832 nmol/LStandard Deviation 31.0318
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 6-19.152 nmol/LStandard Deviation 49.2221
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 7-11.235 nmol/LStandard Deviation 26.2159
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 10-37.473 nmol/LStandard Deviation 120.9186
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 87.731 nmol/LStandard Deviation 27.8994
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 163.501 nmol/LStandard Deviation 9.8729
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 40.976 nmol/LStandard Deviation 11.7759
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 3-3.989 nmol/LStandard Deviation 22.9732
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 1412.729 nmol/LStandard Deviation 49.8823
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 5-8.199 nmol/LStandard Deviation 13.9571
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 26.300 nmol/LStandard Deviation 25.3514
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 5-32.251 nmol/LStandard Deviation 58.3701
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 2-19.452 nmol/LStandard Deviation 50.5551
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 3-14.821 nmol/LStandard Deviation 44.4776
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 4-24.253 nmol/LStandard Deviation 51.2627
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 6-27.518 nmol/LStandard Deviation 52.6672
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 8-39.386 nmol/LStandard Deviation 72.311
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 10-37.083 nmol/LStandard Deviation 60.8092
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 12-38.430 nmol/LStandard Deviation 64.4594
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 14-40.771 nmol/LStandard Deviation 74.3624
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 16-49.843 nmol/LStandard Deviation 77.6316
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 20-52.217 nmol/LStandard Deviation 83.1537
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 28-73.786 nmol/LStandard Deviation 111.0044
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 32-51.296 nmol/LStandard Deviation 67.3437
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 7-33.261 nmol/LStandard Deviation 56.3495
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 24-43.079 nmol/LStandard Deviation 77.4438
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 32-5.485 nmol/LStandard Deviation 11.838
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 14-8.058 nmol/LStandard Deviation 15.8407
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 32.509 nmol/LStandard Deviation 17.5221
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 28-6.044 nmol/LStandard Deviation 11.3755
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 16-4.909 nmol/LStandard Deviation 8.8478
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 7-9.882 nmol/LStandard Deviation 16.2972
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 2-3.450 nmol/LStandard Deviation 5.7767
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 8-5.668 nmol/LStandard Deviation 10.4493
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 6-2.148 nmol/LStandard Deviation 23.2543
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 20-4.378 nmol/LStandard Deviation 7.7297
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 10-6.654 nmol/LStandard Deviation 7.8236
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 5-9.831 nmol/LStandard Deviation 26.2188
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 24-4.802 nmol/LStandard Deviation 10.5639
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 12-7.827 nmol/LStandard Deviation 11.212
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor (AChR) Antibody LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 413.680 nmol/LStandard Deviation 87.1669
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 2p-value: =0.0995% CI: [-60.18, 4.38]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 2p-value: =0.32895% CI: [-47.5, 15.96]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 3p-value: =0.44195% CI: [-44.94, 19.63]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 3p-value: =0.93195% CI: [-30.33, 33.12]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.08795% CI: [-60.46, 4.11]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.78395% CI: [-27.29, 36.16]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 5p-value: =0.07795% CI: [-61.36, 3.21]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 5p-value: =0.3395% CI: [-47.45, 16]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.495% CI: [-47.19, 18.91]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =195% CI: [-32.18, 32.19]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 7p-value: =0.11795% CI: [-59.64, 6.69]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 7p-value: =0.43695% CI: [-44.94, 19.44]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.00595% CI: [-81.54, -14.29]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.21595% CI: [-52.92, 11.95]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.81595% CI: [-37.34, 29.4]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.79495% CI: [-36.84, 28.22]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.03395% CI: [-70.48, -3.08]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: =0.51395% CI: [-43.26, 21.67]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: =0.00295% CI: [-91.69, -20.73]MMRM
Comparison: Week 14p-value: =0.03695% CI: [-71.39, -2.48]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: =0.00195% CI: [-100.64, -25.31]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: =0.1395% CI: [-66.12, 8.51]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer Levels

Clinical laboratory evaluations of anti-MuSK antibodies were tested to monitor disease activity. Data is reported for participants who were positive for anti-MuSK antibodies at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 80.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 100.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 120.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 140.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 160.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 20.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 30.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 40.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 50.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 60.0 titer
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 70.0 titer
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 28-310.0 titerStandard Deviation 438.41
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 32-310.0 titerStandard Deviation 438.41
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 5-240.0 titerStandard Deviation 339.41
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 2-160.0 titerStandard Deviation 226.27
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 7-240.0 titerStandard Deviation 339.41
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 3-200.0 titerStandard Deviation 169.71
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 10-280.0 titerStandard Deviation 395.98
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 6-240.0 titerStandard Deviation 339.41
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 12-300.0 titerStandard Deviation 424.26
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 4-240.0 titerStandard Deviation 339.41
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 14-300.0 titerStandard Deviation 424.26
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 8-280.0 titerStandard Deviation 395.98
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 16-300.0 titerStandard Deviation 424.26
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 200.0 titer
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Anti- Muscle-specific Tyrosine Kinase (MuSK) Titer LevelsChange From Baseline at Week 24-310.0 titerStandard Deviation 438.41
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale Score

Participant-reported scale to assess MG symptoms to evaluate capacity to perform activities of daily living. Each question is graded on a 4-point scale from 0=normal to 3=severe with a total score of 0 to 24; the higher score indicates greater functional impairment and disability. Negative change indicates improvement. Mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.52
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.38
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.19
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 24-4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.62
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 28-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.96
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 32-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.61
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 20-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 20-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.48
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 32-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.99
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 24-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.57
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 28-3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.77295% CI: [-1.72, 2.3]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.29995% CI: [-0.94, 2.97]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.92495% CI: [-2.34, 2.13]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.09195% CI: [-0.32, 4.04]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.88795% CI: [-2.82, 2.45]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.16295% CI: [-0.76, 4.36]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.78495% CI: [-3.01, 2.29]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.16695% CI: [-0.79, 4.37]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.72495% CI: [-1.98, 2.82]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.12495% CI: [-0.52, 4.14]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 14p-value: =0.85695% CI: [-2.91, 3.48]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 14p-value: =0.29295% CI: [-1.48, 4.76]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 16p-value: =0.94495% CI: [-3.14, 3.37]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 16p-value: =0.58995% CI: [-2.33, 4.02]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale Score

An assessment scale of MG disease activity based on a combination of participant- and physician-reported items. Items are scored based on 4 potential levels of impact: normal, mild, moderate, or severe with a total score of 0 to 50; the higher score indicates worse MG disease activity. Negative change indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.52
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-7.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-7.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.29
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.69
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-6.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.95
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-7.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.86
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 20-7.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-9.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.18
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 24-7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 28-5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 32-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.82
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.24
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-7.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.07
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-8.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-9.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.83
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-5.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.11
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 24-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.45
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.55
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 20-2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.21
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.92
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 32-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.07
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.25
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.74
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 28-4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.59
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.85595% CI: [-4.14, 3.45]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.09395% CI: [-0.56, 6.95]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.4195% CI: [-2.61, 6.2]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.15495% CI: [-1.25, 7.5]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.66295% CI: [-5.29, 3.41]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.1395% CI: [-1.02, 7.54]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.58695% CI: [-3.44, 5.98]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.03995% CI: [0.26, 9.6]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.90995% CI: [-4.03, 3.6]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.15895% CI: [-1.09, 6.4]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 14p-value: =0.76495% CI: [-6.8, 5.05]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 14p-value: =0.0895% CI: [-0.67, 11.06]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 16p-value: =0.67795% CI: [-5.98, 3.95]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 16p-value: =0.05595% CI: [-0.1, 9.73]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score

Physician-reported scale to assess MG disease severity by quantifying several body functions by physical exam. Each question is graded on a 4-point scale from 0=normal to 3=severe with a total score of 0 to 39; the higher score indicates greater disease burden. Negative change indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 28-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 32-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.27
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.24
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.43
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.35
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 20-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.56
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 24-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.47
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 32-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.79
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.03
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.51
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 140.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.65
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.81
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 20-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.27
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 24-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 28-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.52
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.40695% CI: [-3.17, 1.31]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.41895% CI: [-1.34, 3.14]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.46395% CI: [-3.53, 1.65]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.93695% CI: [-2.7, 2.49]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.1795% CI: [-4.41, 0.82]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.68795% CI: [-2.1, 3.13]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.37495% CI: [-4.05, 1.57]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.47895% CI: [-1.82, 3.8]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.6995% CI: [-3.12, 2.09]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.10695% CI: [-0.48, 4.71]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 14p-value: =0.54795% CI: [-3.89, 2.12]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 14p-value: =0.14495% CI: [-0.81, 5.18]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 16p-value: =0.43195% CI: [-4.91, 2.17]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 16p-value: =0.48895% CI: [-2.34, 4.74]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale Score

A participant-reported score that assesses the participant's perception of impairment and disability and the degree to which the participant tolerates disease manifestations. Each question is graded on a 3-point scale from 0=normal to 2=severe with a total score of 0 to 30; the higher score indicates worse MG disease activity. Negative change indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analysis at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.85
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.12
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.32
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.44
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.06
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-6.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.98
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.46
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.53
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.07
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-6.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.25
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.83
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 20-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.01
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 24-7.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.95
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 28-4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.36
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 32-6.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.31
TAK-079 300 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 16-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.43
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 4-3.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.43
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 20-4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.48
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 32-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.78
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 10-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 24-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.31
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 12-4.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 8-3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.74
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 14-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.49
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 6-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.53
TAK-079 600 mgChange From Baseline in Revised 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life Scale (MG-QoL15r) Scale ScoreChange From Baseline at Week 28-4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.7895% CI: [-3.23, 4.27]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 4p-value: =0.77195% CI: [-2.99, 3.99]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.98495% CI: [-4.22, 4.14]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 6p-value: =0.21395% CI: [-1.47, 6.35]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.37195% CI: [-6.4, 2.45]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 8p-value: =0.95695% CI: [-4.01, 4.23]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.64195% CI: [-5.65, 3.53]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 10p-value: =0.87695% CI: [-4.61, 3.95]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.45895% CI: [-6.91, 3.18]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 12p-value: =0.76995% CI: [-5.37, 4]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 14p-value: =0.69995% CI: [-7.07, 4.8]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 14p-value: =0.68795% CI: [-4.41, 6.62]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 16p-value: =0.94495% CI: [-5.55, 5.95]MMRM
Comparison: Change From Baseline at Week 16p-value: =0.35195% CI: [-2.87, 7.83]MMRM
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total Score

The percentage of responders with at least a 2-point reduction in MG-ADL total score from baseline is reported. MG-ADL is a participant-reported scale to assess MG symptoms to evaluate capacity to perform activities of daily living. Each question is graded on a 4-point scale from 0=normal to 3=severe with a total score of 0 to 24; the higher score indicates greater functional impairment and disability. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.

Time frame: At Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 240.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 691.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 883.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1083.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1275.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1466.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1666.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 200.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 280.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 450.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 2458.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 475.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1666.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 675.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1475.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1275.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 866.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 2066.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 2858.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1083.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 3241.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1050.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1250.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1450.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 1633.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 3241.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 2058.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 2458.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 658.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 458.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 866.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 2-point Reduction in MG-ADL Total ScoreWeek 2858.33 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total Score

The percentage of responders with at least a 3-point reduction in MGC total score from baseline is reported. MGC is an assessment scale of MG disease activity based on a combination of participant- and physician-reported items. Items are scored based on 4 potential levels of impact: normal, mild, moderate, or severe with a total score of 0 to 50; the higher score indicates worse MG disease activity. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.

Time frame: At Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 240.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 683.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 883.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1083.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1275.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1466.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1666.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 200.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 280.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 466.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 2466.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 475.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1675.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 666.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1483.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1291.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 883.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 2075.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 2858.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1075.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 3241.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1050.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1258.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1450.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 1641.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 3225.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 2058.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 2450.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 658.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 441.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 858.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in MGC Total ScoreWeek 2850.00 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total Score

The percentage of responders with at least a 3-point reduction in QMG total score from baseline is reported. QMG is a physician-reported scale to assess MG disease severity by quantifying several body functions by physical exam. Each question is graded on a 4-point scale from 0=normal to 3=severe with a total score of 0 to 39; the higher score indicates greater disease burden. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal.

Time frame: At Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 240.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 616.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 833.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1033.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1241.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1433.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1633.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 200.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 280.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 320.0 percentage of participants
TAK-079 Placebo-matchingPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 425.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 2441.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 450.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1658.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 641.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1466.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1275.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 866.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 2041.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 2841.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1066.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 300 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 3216.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1033.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1225.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1425.00 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 1633.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 3216.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 2033.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 2433.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 633.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 416.67 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 833.33 percentage of participants
TAK-079 600 mgPercentage of Participants With 3-point Reduction in QMG Total ScoreWeek 2825.00 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026