Multiple Sclerosis
Conditions
Brief summary
Dual tasking such as walking while talking on the phone or while remembering a shopping list is very frequently required in everyday life. Cognitive-motor interference occurs when the performance capacity of a motor or cognitive task decreases when both are performed simultaneously (dual task) compared to single task execution being the so-called dual task cost (DTC). Over the past five years, in MS, (pilot) studies have been conducted in order to investigate the presence and magnitude of the CMI during walking. It was shown that, even in the early stages of the disease, when walking speed is not affected as a single motor task, pwMS slow down more than healthy controls when performing DT walking. Studies have not yet investigated the impact of the complexity of the motor task, on the DTC. Across studies, many different types of cognitive distractors were applied without any documentation of psychometric properties, such as test-retest reliability, making it not yet suited as experimental outcome measure. Results have also focused on the effects of DT on walking performance, while the performance of the cognitive task was rarely assessed. Also, the majority of studies did not document the cognitive function level of pwMS or even excluded patients with cognitive deficits. As such, the relation between cognitive deficits and dual task (cognitive-motor) performance is unclear. Motor and cognitive impairment are currently also treated separately whereas real life performance very often requiring an integrated motor and cognitive function. So far, no studies in MS have investigated the effects of physical or cognitive exercises on DT performances, or investigated effects of integrated cognitive-motor dual task training (DTT). In elderly and other neurological conditions, superior effects of dual task training (DTT) on gait training have been suggested, but the evidence is not robust yet. All these studies suggest the feasibility of DTT on gait improvement and fall risk reduction, but further insights on factors identifying responders, and differential effect of cognitive distractors needs further elucidation. This research consist of two parts that aim to investigate: Part 1: Assessment 1. the magnitude of the dual task cost according to different types of cognitive distractors (information processing, memory, attention, etc.), 2. its reliability as experimental outcome measure and 3. its association with factors as severity of cognitive or motor dysfunction, quality of life and fatigue. Part 2: Intervention 1. the effectiveness of cognitive-motor DT-based training programs compared to single modality training, on DT and ST performances (cognition and mobility) 2. whether dual task learning effects transfer to improvements in daily life and are sustained for 4 weeks without training 3. which patient profiles benefit most from the integrated cognitive-motor training 4. feasibility and usefulness of an adaptive, interactive ICT-guided DTT system.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALDual Task Training
In total 12 Dual Task conditions will be performed in which 3 cognitive tasks are combined with 4 motor tasks: Cognitive tasks: * Titrated digit span backwards * Auditory vigilance with alphabets * Subtracting by 7 Motor tasks: * Walking at self-selected speed * Walking while carrying a cup of water * Walking while stepping over obstacles * Walking crisscross
OTHERSingle Mobility Training
standard routine training
Sponsors
Revalidatie & MS Centrum Overpelt
National MS Center Melsbroek
AZ Klina
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege
Masku Neurological Rehabilitation Centre
Tel Aviv University
Sheba Medical Center
AISM Rehabilitation Service of Genoa
Hasselt University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
knows what kind of training, but not whether the trainings-group is the control group
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of MS according to McDonald criteria * EDSS ≥2 and ≤ 6 * No relapse within the last 30 days * No changes in disease modifying treatment and no corticoid-therapy within the last 50 days * All types of MS * Minimal cognitive functioning (MMSE≥26) * Presence of dual task interference (dual task screening list ≥1)
Exclusion criteria
* Other medical conditions interfering with mobility * Other neurological diagnoses * MS-like syndroms such as neruomyelitis optica * Not able to understand and execute simple instructions * Problems (even after adjustment with hearing aids or glasses) with hearing or vision interfering with the assessment or training. * Ongoing dual task training or other interfering physical therapy or cognitive training/neuropsychological rehabilitation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Vigilance - Crisscross - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked crisscross from cone to cone every 2m with 80cm fixed width in between at self-selected speed on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the vigilance task. The vigilance task is a task in which the participants listened to letters of the alphabet and had to say aloud 'yes' every time they heard 1 of the 2 target letters (e.g. 'L' or 'R') and were asked not to respond when another letter was heard. |
| Digit Span - Walk - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the titrated digit span backwards. The titrated digit span backward is a task in which the participant hears a string of numbers that they have to repeat in reverse order (f.e. 1 4 5 - 5 4 1 |
| Subtraction - Walk - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the serial subtraction with sevens task. The serial subtraction with sevens task is a task in which the participant was given a starting number of 3 digits (e.g. 152) from which they had to continuously subtract sevens (f.e. 152 -\> 145 - 138 - 131, etc.) |
| Vigilance - Walk - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the vigilance task. The vigilance task is a task in which the participants listened to letters of the alphabet and had to say aloud 'yes' every time they heard 1 of the 2 target letters (e.g. 'L' or 'R') and were asked not to respond when another letter was heard. |
| Digit Span - Cup - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed with a cup filled with water in the hand on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the titrated digit span backwards. The titrated digit span backward is a task in which the participant hears a string of numbers that they have to repeat in reverse order (f.e. 1 4 5 -\> 5 4 1). |
| Subtraction - Cup - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed with a cup filled with water in the hand on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the serial subtraction with sevens task. The serial subtraction with sevens task is a task in which the participant was given a starting number of 3 digits (e.g. 152) from which they had to continuously subtract sevens (f.e. 152 -\> 145 - 138 - 131, etc.). |
| Vigilance - Cup - Dual Task Cost (%) | baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed with a cup filled with water in the hand on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the vigilance task. The vigilance task is a task in which the participants listened to letters of the alphabet and had to say aloud 'yes' every time they heard 1 of the 2 target letters (e.g. 'L' or 'R') and were asked not to respond when another letter was heard |
| Digit Span - Obstacles - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed while stepping over obstacles placed every 3 meters on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the titrated digit span backwards. The titrated digit span backward is a task in which the participant hears a string of numbers that they have to repeat in reverse order (f.e. 1 4 5 -\> 5 4 1). |
| Subtraction - Obstacles - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed while stepping over obstacles placed every 3 meters on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the serial subtraction with sevens task. The serial subtraction with sevens task is a task in which the participant was given a starting number of 3 digits (e.g. 152) from which they had to continuously subtract sevens (f.e. 152 -\> 145 - 138 - 131, etc.). |
| Vigilance - Obstacles - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked at self-selected speed while stepping over obstacles placed every 3 meters on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the vigilance task. The vigilance task is a task in which the participants listened to letters of the alphabet and had to say aloud 'yes' every time they heard 1 of the 2 target letters (e.g. 'L' or 'R') and were asked not to respond when another letter was heard. |
| Digit Span - Crisscross - Dual Task Cost (%) | baseline | persons walked crisscross from cone to cone every 2m with 80cm fixed width in between at self-selected speed on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the titrated digit span backwards. The titrated digit span backward is a task in which the participant hears a string of numbers that they have to repeat in reverse order (f.e. 1 4 5 -\> 5 4 1). |
| Subtraction - Crisscross - Dual Task Cost (%) | Baseline | persons walked crisscross from cone to cone every 2m with 80cm fixed width in between at self-selected speed on a 30-meter walkway for 1 minute, while performing the serial subtraction with sevens task. The serial subtraction with sevens task is a task in which the participant was given a starting number of 3 digits (e.g. 152) from which they had to continuously subtract sevens (f.e. 152 -\> 145 - 138 - 131, etc.). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Timed 25 Foot-walk test (T25FW) | baseline | test of motor function in which participants walk 25-foot. |
| Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests | baseline | This battery consists of six tests in different cognitive domains: 1) the Selective Reminding test, 2) the 10/36 spatial recall test, 3) the symbol digit modalities test, 4) the Paced auditory serial addition test with 3 seconds, 5) the Paced auditory serial addition test with 2 seconds and 6) the word list generation. |
| Part of Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests | Week 9 (post-measure) | The symbol digit modalities test, the Paced auditory serial addition test with 3 seconds and the Paced auditory serial addition test with 2 seconds were assessed. |
| Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) | baseline | Questionnaire to record participants' perceived impact of MS on day-to-day life. a 29-item self-report measure comprised of 20 items associated with a physical scale and 9 items associated with a psychological scale.1 Items question patients (or their proxies) about the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on day-today life in the last 2 weeks. All items have 5 response options from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). Each of the 2 scales are scored by summing the responses across items, then converting to a 0 to 100 scale, where 100 indicates greater impact of disease on daily function (worse health). |
| Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | baseline | This questionnaire measures the effects of fatigue on three levels: physical, cognitive and psychosocial. The MFIS is a 21-item questionaire, scale 0 (never)-4 (always), scale range 0-40 |
| Timed-up-and-go test (TUG) | baseline | test of walking and balance in which participants stand up from a chair, walk, turn and sit down again. |
| Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) | Baseline | test in which assessor scores gait performance of the participant. |
| 2-minute walking test (2MWT) | baseline | test of walking in which participants walk for 2 minutes |
| Multiple sclerosis walking scale-12 (MSWS-12) | baseline | questionnaire to measure perception of limitations in walking ability caused by MS. |
| Falls efficacy scale (FES-I) | baseline | uestionnaire to measure concerns about the possibility of falling. |
| Dual Task Questionnaire | Baseline | Questionnaire to record participants' perception of dual task problems in daily life. |
Countries
Belgium
Outcome results
None listed