Skip to content

A Study to Test the Effect of Empagliflozin in Patients Who Are in Hospital for Acute Heart Failure

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, 90-day Superiority Trial to Evaluate the Effect on Clinical Benefit, Safety and Tolerability of Once Daily Oral EMPagliflozin 10 mg Compared to Placebo, Initiated in Patients Hospitalised for acUte Heart faiLure (de Novo or Decompensated Chronic HF) Who Have Been StabilisEd (EMPULSE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04157751
Enrollment
530
Registered
2019-11-08
Start date
2020-05-18
Completion date
2021-06-02
Last updated
2022-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

This is a study in adults who are in hospital for acute heart failure. The purpose of this study is to find out whether starting to take a medicine called empagliflozin soon after first being treated in hospital helps people with acute heart failure. Participants are in the study for about 3 months. At the beginning, participants are still in hospital. Later, they visit the hospital about 3 times and get 1 phone call. Participants are put into 2 groups by chance. One group takes 1 empagliflozin tablet a day. The other group takes 1 placebo tablet a day. Placebo tablets look like empagliflozin tablets but do not contain any medicine. Empagliflozin belongs to a class of medicines known as SGLT-2 inhibitors. It is used to treat type 2 diabetes. During the study, the doctors check whether participants have additional heart failure events like needing to go to the hospital again because of heart failure. The participants answer questions about how their heart failure affects their life. We then compare the results between the empagliflozin and placebo groups. The doctors also regularly check the general health of the participants.

Interventions

DRUGEmpagliflozin

Film-coated tablet

Film-coated tablet

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Currently hospitalised for the primary diagnosis of acute heart failure (de novo or decompensated chronic HF), regardless of ejection fraction (EF). Patients with a diagnosis of hospitalized heart failure must have HF symptoms at the time of hospital admission * Evidence of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, either reduced or preserved EF) as per local reading preferably measured during current hospitalisation or in the 12 months prior to randomisation * Patients must be randomised after at least 24 hours and no later than 5 days after admission, as early as possible after stabilization and while still in hospital * Patients must fulfil the following stabilisation criteria (while in the hospital): * SBP ≥100mm Hg and no symptoms of hypotension in the preceding 6 hours, * no increase in i.v. diuretic dose for 6 hours prior to randomisation, * no i.v. vasodilators including nitrates within the last 6 hours prior to randomisation * no i.v. inotropic drugs for 24 hours prior to randomisation. * Elevated NT-proBNP ≥ 1600pg/mL or BNP ≥400 pg/mL according to the local lab, for patients without atrial fibrillation (AF); or elevated NT-proBNP ≥ 2400pg/mL or BNP ≥600 pg/mL for patients with AF, measured during the current hospitalization or in the 72 hours prior to hospital admission,. For patients treated with an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in the previous 4 weeks prior to randomisation, only NT-proBNP values should be used * HF episode leading to hospitalisation must have been treated with a minimum single dose of 40 mg of i.v. furosemide (or equivalent i.v. loop diuretic defined as 20 mg of torasemide or 1 mg of bumetanide) * Further Inclusion Criteria Apply

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiogenic shock * Current hospitalisation for acute heart failure primarily triggered by pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident, or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) * Current hospitalisation for acute heart failure not caused primarily by intravascular volume overload; * Below interventions in the past 30 days prior to randomisation or planned during the study: * Major cardiac surgery, or TAVI (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation), or PCI, or Mitraclip * All other surgeries that are considered major according to investigator judgement * Implantation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) device * cardiac mechanical support implantation * Carotid artery disease revascularisation (stent or surgery) * Acute coronary syndrome / myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the past 90 days prior to randomisation * Heart transplant recipient, or listed for heart transplant with expectation to receive a transplant during the course of this trial (according to investigator judgement), or planned for palliative care for HF, or currently using left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or any other type of mechanical circulatory support, or patients on mechanical ventilation, or patients with planned inotropic support in an outpatient setting * Haemodynamically significant (severe) uncorrected primary cardiac valvular disease planned for surgery or intervention during the course of the study (note: secondary mitral regurgitation or tricuspid regurgitation due to dilated cardiomyopathy is not excluded unless planned for surgery or intervention during the course of the study) * Impaired renal function, defined as eGFR \< 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 as measured during hospitalization (latest local lab measurement before randomisation) or requiring dialysis * Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) * History of ketoacidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) * Further

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentUp to 90 days. For KCCQ-TSS: at baseline and at day 90.Clinical benefit, a composite of death, number of HFEs, time to first HFE and change from baseline (CfB) in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) after 90 days of treatment. All patients randomised to empagliflozin are compared to all patients randomised to placebo within strata. For any two patients, a patient will win, i.e. achieve a better clinical outcome, as determined by assessing the following criteria sequentially, stopping when an advantage for either patient is shown: 1. Death: death is worse than no death; earlier death is worse; tied if not possible to determine. 2. Number of HFEs: more HFEs is worse; tied, if same number of HFEs. 3. Time to first HFE: earlier HFE is worse; tied, if not possible to determine. 4. KCCQ-TSS CfB at Day 90: more positive CfB is better; the threshold for the difference is \>= 5 for a win; tied, if difference \< 5. The KCCQ-TSS ranges from 0 to 100, where a higher score reflects a better outcome. pct. = percentage

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentAt baseline, at day 15, 30 and at day 90.Change from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS). The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire that includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life and self-efficacy. The symptom frequency and symptom burden domains are merged into the total symptom score. The score is represented on a 0-to-100-point scale, where a higher score reflects a better health status. Change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS at day 90 was modeled using a MMRM with visit (day 15 and day 30) as repeated measures, adjusted mean (standard error) after 90 days of treatment is reported.
Change From Baseline in Log-transformed N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Over 30 Days of TreatmentFrom baseline to day 30.Change from baseline in log-transformed N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) Area under the curve (AUC) over 30 days of treatment is reported.
Percentage of Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) From Study Drug Initiation Until 30 Days After Initial Hospital DischargeUp to 30 days after initial hospital discharge.The follow-up time for DAOH analyses was defined as 30 days after initial hospital discharge, or time between initial hospital discharge and date of censoring for non-fatal events except for patients who died within the first 30 days, where 30 days was considered as the DAOH follow-up time. DAOH for each patient was calculated as follow-up time subtracted by the number of days in hospital during the 30 days after initial hospital discharge as well as the number of days being dead within the 30 days. Percentage DAOH was defined as DAOH divided by the DAOH follow-up time of each patient multiplied by 100.
Percentage of Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) From Study Drug Initiation Until 90 Days After RandomisationUp to 90 days after randomisation.The follow-up time for DAOH analyses was defined as 90 days after randomisation, or time between randomisation and date of censoring for non-fatal events except for patients who died within the first 90 days, where 90 days was considered as the DAOH follow-up time. DAOH for each patient was calculated as follow-up time subtracted by the number of days in hospital during the 90 days after randomisation as well as the number of days being dead within the first 90 days. Percentage DAOH was defined as DAOH divided by the DAOH follow-up time of each patient multiplied by 100.
Number of Participants With Improvement of at Least 10 Points in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentAt baseline and at day 90.Number of participants with improvement of at least 10 points in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) from baseline after 90 days of treatment. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire that includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life and self-efficacy. The symptom frequency and symptom burden domains are merged into the total symptom score. Scores are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale, where a higher score reflects a better health status.
Number of Participants With Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) Until 30 Days After Initial Hospital DischargeUp to 30 days after initial hospital discharge.Number of participants with hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) until 30 days after initial hospital discharge.
Composite Renal Endpoint: Number of Participants With Chronic Dialysis, Renal Transplant, Sustained Reduction in eGFR(CKD-EPI)crUp to 90 days.The occurrence of the composite renal endpoint: * chronic dialysis (with a frequency of twice per week or more for at least 90 days), or * renal transplant, or * sustained reduction in Glomerular filtration rate estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula with serum creatinine measurement (eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr) from baseline of ≥40%, or * sustained eGFR \[mL/min/1.73 m2\] \<15 and baseline value ≥30, or * sustained eGFR \<10 and baseline value \<30; is reported by number of participants with component events. (These events may have occurred after the endpoint was already met. Combinations may not have occurred on the same day). Sustained was determined by 2 or more consecutive post-baseline central laboratory measurements separated by at least 30 days.
Weight Change Per Mean Daily Loop Diuretic Dose After 15 Days of TreatmentAt baseline and at day 15.Diuretic effect as assessed by weight change per mean daily loop diuretic dose after 15 days of treatment. Diuretic dose = 40 mg intravenous furosemide or 80 mg oral furosemide. Abbreviation: Kg: Kilogram
Weight Change Per Mean Daily Loop Diuretic Dose After 30 Days of TreatmentAt baseline and at day 30.Diuretic effect as assessed by weight change per mean daily loop diuretic dose after 30 days of treatment. Diuretic dose = 40 mg intravenous furosemide or 80 mg oral furosemide Abbreviation: Kg: Kilogram
Incidence Rate of First Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure Event (HFE) Until End of Trial VisitUp to 127 days.Incidence rate of first occurrence of CV death or HFE until end of trial visit per 100 patient-year (pt-yrs) at risk is reported. Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100\* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\].

Countries

Belgium, Canada, China, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial to assess whether in-hospital administration of empagliflozin results in improvement in heart failure-related outcomes compared to placebo in patients with acute heart failure.

Pre-assignment details

All subjects were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Subjects attended a specialist site which ensured that they (the subjects) strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Subjects were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any of the entry criteria were violated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
1 film-coated tablet of placebo matching 10 mg empagliflozin was administered orally once daily in patients with acute heart failure.
265
10 mg Empagliflozin
1 film-coated tablet of 10 milligram (mg) of empagliflozin was administered orally once daily in patients with acute heart failure.
265
Total530

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event3423
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up62
Overall StudyNot treated15
Overall StudyOther reason not stated above1010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1217

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo10 mg EmpagliflozinTotal
Age, Continuous68.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
68.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
68.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
256 Participants259 Participants515 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire-Total symptom score (KCCQ-TSS)41.91 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.98
39.71 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.06
40.81 Score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.02
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
25 Participants32 Participants57 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
33 Participants21 Participants54 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
202 Participants211 Participants413 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
93 Participants86 Participants179 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
172 Participants179 Participants351 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
22 / 26511 / 265
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 26420 / 260
serious
Total, serious adverse events
115 / 26484 / 260

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of Treatment

Clinical benefit, a composite of death, number of HFEs, time to first HFE and change from baseline (CfB) in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) after 90 days of treatment. All patients randomised to empagliflozin are compared to all patients randomised to placebo within strata. For any two patients, a patient will win, i.e. achieve a better clinical outcome, as determined by assessing the following criteria sequentially, stopping when an advantage for either patient is shown: 1. Death: death is worse than no death; earlier death is worse; tied if not possible to determine. 2. Number of HFEs: more HFEs is worse; tied, if same number of HFEs. 3. Time to first HFE: earlier HFE is worse; tied, if not possible to determine. 4. KCCQ-TSS CfB at Day 90: more positive CfB is better; the threshold for the difference is \>= 5 for a win; tied, if difference \< 5. The KCCQ-TSS ranges from 0 to 100, where a higher score reflects a better outcome. pct. = percentage

Time frame: Up to 90 days. For KCCQ-TSS: at baseline and at day 90.

Population: Randomised Set (RS), including all randomised patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentTime to death4.01 pct. (%) of winning pairwise comparisons
PlaceboPercentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentFrequency of HFEs7.65 pct. (%) of winning pairwise comparisons
PlaceboPercentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentTime to HFE0.57 pct. (%) of winning pairwise comparisons
PlaceboPercentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentKCCQ-TSS change from baseline (>=5-point difference)27.48 pct. (%) of winning pairwise comparisons
10 mg EmpagliflozinPercentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentKCCQ-TSS change from baseline (>=5-point difference)35.91 pct. (%) of winning pairwise comparisons
10 mg EmpagliflozinPercentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentTime to death7.15 pct. (%) of winning pairwise comparisons
10 mg EmpagliflozinPercentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentTime to HFE0.24 pct. (%) of winning pairwise comparisons
10 mg EmpagliflozinPercentage of Pairwise Comparisons With Wins of Clinical Benefit, a Composite of Death, Number of Heart Failure Events (HFEs), Time to the First HFE and ≥5-point Difference in CfB in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of TreatmentFrequency of HFEs10.59 pct. (%) of winning pairwise comparisons
Comparison: Stratified win ratio (WR) was used, calculated as total number of wins in the empa group across all strata divided by total number of losses. Weights were applied analogous to a Mantel-Haenszel approach.~1. death in pbo first;~2. death in empa first;~3. HFEs in pbo more frequently;~4. HFEs in empa more frequently;~5. HFEs in pbo first;~6. HFEs in empa first;~7. KCCQ-TSS change lower in pbo;~8. KCCQ-TSS change lower in empap-value: 0.002795% CI: [1.09, 1.68]Asymptotic normal U statistics approach
Secondary

Change From Baseline in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of Treatment

Change from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS). The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire that includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life and self-efficacy. The symptom frequency and symptom burden domains are merged into the total symptom score. The score is represented on a 0-to-100-point scale, where a higher score reflects a better health status. Change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS at day 90 was modeled using a MMRM with visit (day 15 and day 30) as repeated measures, adjusted mean (standard error) after 90 days of treatment is reported.

Time frame: At baseline, at day 15, 30 and at day 90.

Population: Patients in the randomised set (RS) and with non-missing data for this endpoint. Observed case including data after treatment discontinuation (OC-AD).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of Treatment31.73 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.49
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of Treatment36.19 Score on a scaleStandard Error 1.48
Comparison: Restricted maximum likelihood estimation based on a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis to obtain adjusted means for the treatment effects. This model included discrete fixed effects for treatment group, and heart failure status at each visit and continuous fixed effects for baseline value at each visit. Missing data caused by patient withdrawal or other reasons were handled implicitly by the MMRM approach. Unstructured covariance structure was used.p-value: 0.034795% CI: [0.32, 8.59]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Log-transformed N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Over 30 Days of Treatment

Change from baseline in log-transformed N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) Area under the curve (AUC) over 30 days of treatment is reported.

Time frame: From baseline to day 30.

Population: Patients included the randomised set (RS), and with non-missing data for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Log-transformed N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Over 30 Days of Treatment26.77 Picogram/milliliter * days
10 mg EmpagliflozinChange From Baseline in Log-transformed N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Over 30 Days of Treatment24.07 Picogram/milliliter * days
Comparison: Area under the curve (AUC) of change from baseline in log-transformed NT-proBNP level over 30 days of treatment was analysed by an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). NT-proBNP level is regarded as log-normally distributed, therefore values were log-transformed prior to analysis. The linear trapezoidal rule was used to calculate the AUC after the log-transformation had been applied to each value.p-value: 0.017695% CI: [0.82, 0.98]ANCOVA
Secondary

Composite Renal Endpoint: Number of Participants With Chronic Dialysis, Renal Transplant, Sustained Reduction in eGFR(CKD-EPI)cr

The occurrence of the composite renal endpoint: * chronic dialysis (with a frequency of twice per week or more for at least 90 days), or * renal transplant, or * sustained reduction in Glomerular filtration rate estimated by the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formula with serum creatinine measurement (eGFR (CKD-EPI)cr) from baseline of ≥40%, or * sustained eGFR \[mL/min/1.73 m2\] \<15 and baseline value ≥30, or * sustained eGFR \<10 and baseline value \<30; is reported by number of participants with component events. (These events may have occurred after the endpoint was already met. Combinations may not have occurred on the same day). Sustained was determined by 2 or more consecutive post-baseline central laboratory measurements separated by at least 30 days.

Time frame: Up to 90 days.

Population: Randomised Set (RS), including all randomised patients.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboComposite Renal Endpoint: Number of Participants With Chronic Dialysis, Renal Transplant, Sustained Reduction in eGFR(CKD-EPI)cr2 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinComposite Renal Endpoint: Number of Participants With Chronic Dialysis, Renal Transplant, Sustained Reduction in eGFR(CKD-EPI)cr0 Participants
Secondary

Incidence Rate of First Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure Event (HFE) Until End of Trial Visit

Incidence rate of first occurrence of CV death or HFE until end of trial visit per 100 patient-year (pt-yrs) at risk is reported. Incidence rate per 100 pt-yrs = 100\* number of patients with event / time at risk \[years\].

Time frame: Up to 127 days.

Population: Randomised Set (RS), including all randomised patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboIncidence Rate of First Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure Event (HFE) Until End of Trial Visit78.81 Patients with events / 100pt-yrs at risk
10 mg EmpagliflozinIncidence Rate of First Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV) Death or Heart Failure Event (HFE) Until End of Trial Visit55.01 Patients with events / 100pt-yrs at risk
p-value: 0.124195% CI: [0.46, 1.1]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) Until 30 Days After Initial Hospital Discharge

Number of participants with hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) until 30 days after initial hospital discharge.

Time frame: Up to 30 days after initial hospital discharge.

Population: Randomised Set (RS), including all randomised patients.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) Until 30 Days After Initial Hospital Discharge12 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinNumber of Participants With Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HHF) Until 30 Days After Initial Hospital Discharge14 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement of at Least 10 Points in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of Treatment

Number of participants with improvement of at least 10 points in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) from baseline after 90 days of treatment. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire that includes 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life and self-efficacy. The symptom frequency and symptom burden domains are merged into the total symptom score. Scores are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale, where a higher score reflects a better health status.

Time frame: At baseline and at day 90.

Population: Randomised Set (RS), including all randomised patients.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of at Least 10 Points in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of Treatment202 Participants
10 mg EmpagliflozinNumber of Participants With Improvement of at Least 10 Points in KCCQ-TSS After 90 Days of Treatment220 Participants
Comparison: Logistic regression including terms for baseline KCCQ-TSS, treatment and heart failure statusp-value: 0.09795% CI: [0.927, 2.501]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) From Study Drug Initiation Until 30 Days After Initial Hospital Discharge

The follow-up time for DAOH analyses was defined as 30 days after initial hospital discharge, or time between initial hospital discharge and date of censoring for non-fatal events except for patients who died within the first 30 days, where 30 days was considered as the DAOH follow-up time. DAOH for each patient was calculated as follow-up time subtracted by the number of days in hospital during the 30 days after initial hospital discharge as well as the number of days being dead within the 30 days. Percentage DAOH was defined as DAOH divided by the DAOH follow-up time of each patient multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Up to 30 days after initial hospital discharge.

Population: Patients included the treated set (TS), and with non-missing data for this endpoint. TS includes all patients treated with at least one dose of trial medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) From Study Drug Initiation Until 30 Days After Initial Hospital Discharge80.90 DAOH in percentage (%)Standard Deviation 21.25
10 mg EmpagliflozinPercentage of Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) From Study Drug Initiation Until 30 Days After Initial Hospital Discharge81.37 DAOH in percentage (%)Standard Deviation 18.62
Secondary

Percentage of Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) From Study Drug Initiation Until 90 Days After Randomisation

The follow-up time for DAOH analyses was defined as 90 days after randomisation, or time between randomisation and date of censoring for non-fatal events except for patients who died within the first 90 days, where 90 days was considered as the DAOH follow-up time. DAOH for each patient was calculated as follow-up time subtracted by the number of days in hospital during the 90 days after randomisation as well as the number of days being dead within the first 90 days. Percentage DAOH was defined as DAOH divided by the DAOH follow-up time of each patient multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Up to 90 days after randomisation.

Population: Patients in the treated set (TS) and with non-missing data for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) From Study Drug Initiation Until 90 Days After Randomisation85.79 DAOH in percentage (%)Standard Deviation 22.76
10 mg EmpagliflozinPercentage of Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) From Study Drug Initiation Until 90 Days After Randomisation87.55 DAOH in percentage (%)Standard Deviation 19.54
Secondary

Weight Change Per Mean Daily Loop Diuretic Dose After 15 Days of Treatment

Diuretic effect as assessed by weight change per mean daily loop diuretic dose after 15 days of treatment. Diuretic dose = 40 mg intravenous furosemide or 80 mg oral furosemide. Abbreviation: Kg: Kilogram

Time frame: At baseline and at day 15.

Population: Patients in the randomised set (RS) and with non-missing values for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboWeight Change Per Mean Daily Loop Diuretic Dose After 15 Days of Treatment-2.43 Kg per loop diuretic doseStandard Deviation 23.46
10 mg EmpagliflozinWeight Change Per Mean Daily Loop Diuretic Dose After 15 Days of Treatment-4.45 Kg per loop diuretic doseStandard Deviation 16.65
Secondary

Weight Change Per Mean Daily Loop Diuretic Dose After 30 Days of Treatment

Diuretic effect as assessed by weight change per mean daily loop diuretic dose after 30 days of treatment. Diuretic dose = 40 mg intravenous furosemide or 80 mg oral furosemide Abbreviation: Kg: Kilogram

Time frame: At baseline and at day 30.

Population: Patients in the randomised set (RS) and with non-missing values for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboWeight Change Per Mean Daily Loop Diuretic Dose After 30 Days of Treatment-2.69 Kg per loop diuretic doseStandard Deviation 21.74
10 mg EmpagliflozinWeight Change Per Mean Daily Loop Diuretic Dose After 30 Days of Treatment-6.91 Kg per loop diuretic doseStandard Deviation 25.34

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026