Skip to content

Argon Plasma Coagulation for Barrett's Esophagus

Argon Plasma Coagulation for Barrett's Esophagus With Low Grade Dysplasia: A Randomized Trial With Long Term Follow-up Evaluating the Impact of Power Setting and Proton Pump Inhibitor Dose

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04154748
Enrollment
71
Registered
2019-11-06
Start date
2002-06-04
Completion date
2019-07-05
Last updated
2019-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Barretts Esophagus With Low Grade Dysplasia

Keywords

Barretts Esophagus, Dysplasia, Argon Plasma Coagulation, Endoscopic Treatment

Brief summary

Background and study aims. To evaluate the impact of power setting and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dose on the efficacy and safety of argon plasma coagulation (APC) of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with low-grade dysplasia (LGD). Patients and methods. Investigator initiated, single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in a tertiary referral center in Poland. Consecutive patients with BE and LGD were randomly assigned to APC with power set at 90 Watt (90W) or 60 Watt (60W) followed by 120 mg or 40 mg omeprazole for six weeks. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of complete (endoscopic and histologic) ablation of BE at six weeks. Secondary outcomes included safety and long-term efficacy (at two years and at the end of a long-term follow-up of over 4 years.

Interventions

DEVICEArgon Plasma Coagulation 90W power
DEVICEArgon Plasma Coagulation 60W power
DRUGOmeprazole 120 mg

Sponsors

Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education
CollaboratorOTHER
Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients were blinded to the power settings used for APC, but they knew the PPI dose they received. The endoscopist performing APC ablation was blinded to participant allocation and APC power setting (the power was set up by an assistant who knew the group allocation and the power display remained covered during the entire procedure). The endoscopist and pathologist involved in efficacy assessment were blinded to participant allocation.

Intervention model description

Investigator initiated, single-center, parallel-group RCT conducted in a tertiary referral center in Poland.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* consecutive adult patients with low-grade dysplasia in flat Barrett's mucosa referred for endoscopic treatment, * signed an informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma, * visible lesions (nodules, ulcerations) in Barrett's mucosa, * serious comorbidities and short life expectancy, * coagulopathy, * pregnancy or lactation, * psychiatric disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete ablation rate 6 weeks after APC treatment.6 weeksComplete ablation was defined as no endoscopic and histologic evidence of Barrett's mucosa, dysplasia, and buried metaplastic glands

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse event rate during APC treatment and within 6-week post-treatment period6 weeks
Complete ablation rate two years after APC treatment2 yearsComplete ablation was defined as no endoscopic and histologic evidence of Barrett's mucosa, dysplasia, and buried metaplastic glands
Complete ablation rate at the end of follow-upLong term follow-up (>4 yars)Complete ablation was defined as no endoscopic and histologic evidence of Barrett's mucosa, dysplasia, and buried metaplastic glands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026