Skip to content

Idebenone for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine

A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial of Idebenone in the Prevention of Episodic Migraine

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04151472
Enrollment
180
Registered
2019-11-05
Start date
2021-12-08
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Headache Disorders, Migraine Disorders

Keywords

Migraine Prophylaxis, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Idebenone, Individualized Treatment

Brief summary

Idebenone improves energy metabolism similarly to Coenzyme Q10, which is effective in migraine prophylaxis. The investigators compare idebenone (90 mg/day, 270 mg/day) and placebo in 180 migraine patients in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to study whether Idebenone is superior to placebo in the prevention of episodic migraine with or without aura.

Detailed description

One-hundred-and-eighty subjects will be recruited for a placebo-controlled, double-blinded study of idebenone (90 mg/day, 270 mg/day) versus placebo. One-hundred-and-eighty subjects will be recruited based on past research and an expected 20% dropout rate. A dose of 90mg or 270 mg is based on large number of reports at study initiation in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy that demonstrated the safety of 900mg/day. Subjects are 18 to 65 years old, inclusive, who meet the International Classification of Headache Disorder- III (ICHD-III) for episodic migraine with or without aura, no over consumption of acute anti-migraine medication, no other prophylactic medication (washout 3 months), no serious organic or psychiatric disease, who are recommended to start prophylactic therapy (two to eight attacks per month). Written informed consent is obtained. The process of patients through the trial phases follows the CONSORT flow chart. Idebenone and placebo were provided by Qilu Pharmaceutical Company Limited, China. Placebo consisted of the same ingredients as verum-instead idebenone, they classify as fit for human consumption in the China and without any known effect on migraine. The design of this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial followed the IHS Committee on Clinical Trials in Migraine guidelines, 8 current EU guidelines on Good Clinical Practice, and the Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by Neurology Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. This study is supported by the following funding sources: the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LY19H090025, Grant No. LQ15H090003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81101157). The study is also supported by Qilu Pharmaceutical Company Limited, China (http://www.qilu-pharma.com); the use of idebenone in migraine, is patent pending in the China. Dr. Kaiming Liu do not receive honoraria from the sponsor of the study. Exclusion criteria includes subjects who previously failed idebenone therapy for migraine prophylaxis, those who previously discontinued idebenone due to adverse events, those who are taking idebenone or had taken idebenone within 14 days prior to enrollment, and subjects with continuous headaches. Subjects will be equally randomized to be treated with 90 mg/day idebenone, 270 mg/day idebenone, or placebo for 3 months. At the first visit, patients will receive placebo for a 1-month base-line. At the second visit, they will be randomized to be treated with 90 mg/day idebenone, 270 mg/day idebenone, or placebo for next 3 months if they have presented at least one migraine attack. The primary objective is to assess whether at least 1 dose of Idebenone is superior to placebo in overall mean change from baseline of 4-week migraine headache days (MHD) during double-blind treatment. Key secondary outcome variables will be change of migraine attack frequency, migraine moderate/severe headache days, the proportion of subjects with at least 50%, at least 75%, and 100% reduction in migraine days, mean severity of migraine, acute treatment utilization, quality of life related to episodic migraine as measured by the The Role Function Physical subscale in The Migraine-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire (MSQ v2.1), migraine-related disability as measured by The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) scores, and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores from baseline of 4-week to the entire double-blind treatment phase. Responders for attack frequency (50% reduction) will be calculated and the number-needed-to-treat (NNT) determined. Patients will be interviewed about adverse events at each visit. Statistical analysis will be done on an intention-to-treat population applying the last visit carried forward method. Mann-Whitney U test will be used for differences between groups, 2 test for 22 contingency tables of responder rate, general linear mixed model for evolution over time. Significance level is p\<0.05, after accounting for multiple comparisons. SPSS will be used.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo oral tablet, three times a day

DRUG90mg Idebenone

Idebenone 30 MG Oral Tablet, three times a day

DRUG270mg Idebenone

Idebenone 90 MG Oral Tablet, three times a day

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of episodic migraine. 2. Patients (18-65 years) were eligible if they met International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for episodic migraine with/ without aura with a migraine history 1 year 3. Two to eight attacks per month, 5 days/month of interval headaches. 4. No over consumption of acute anti-migraine medication. 5. No other prophylactic medication (washout 3 months). 6. No serious organic or psychiatric disease. 7. Only women with contraceptive protection.

Exclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of chronic migraine. 2. Subjects previously discontinued idebenone due to adverse events. 3. Subjects are taking idebenone or had taken idebenone within 14 days prior to enrollment. 4. Subjects with continuous headaches.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change of migraine attack frequencymonth 0, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4The change of migraine attack frequency in month 4 compared with baseline. Headache data (e.g., occurrence, duration, and pain severity; occurrence of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or vomiting; and any use of migraine medication) were captured daily through a daily headache-diary. Degree of pain and results of treatment are scored by visual analogue scale(VAS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean severity of migrainemonth 0, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4Mean severity of migraine per month compared with baselineHeadache data (e.g., occurrence, duration, and pain severity; occurrence of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or vomiting; and any use of migraine medication) were captured daily through a daily headache-diary. Degree of pain is scored by VAS.
The change of days with nausea/vomitingmonth 0, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4The change of days with nausea/vomiting per month compared with baselineHeadache data (e.g., occurrence, duration, and pain severity; occurrence of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or vomiting; and any use of migraine medication) were captured daily through a daily headache-diary.
The change of days with headachemonth 0, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4The change of days with headache per month compared with baseline. Headache data (e.g., occurrence, duration, and pain severity; occurrence of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or vomiting; and any use of migraine medication) were captured daily through a daily headache-diary.
50% Responder rate for attack frequencymonth 0, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 450% Responder rate for attack frequency compared with baselineHeadache data (e.g., occurrence, duration, and pain severity; occurrence of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or vomiting; and any use of migraine medication) were captured daily through a daily headache-diary.
Mean no. tablets per daymonth 0, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4Mean no. tablets per day compared with baselineHeadache data (e.g., occurrence, duration, and pain severity; occurrence of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or vomiting; and any use of migraine medication) were captured daily through a daily headache-diary.
Mean duration of migrainemonth 0, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 4Mean duration of migraine per month compared with baselineHeadache data (e.g., occurrence, duration, and pain severity; occurrence of photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, or vomiting; and any use of migraine medication) were captured daily through a daily headache-diary.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactKaiming Liu, MD & PHD
2314411@zju.edu.cn+8615068862055

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026