Skip to content

Effects of Exten(d) Supplementation on Training Ability in Recreational Runners

Effects of Dietary Supplementation With Exten(d) Blend on Training Ability in Recreational Runners: A Pilot Randomized, Triple-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04150211
Acronym
Exten(d)
Enrollment
33
Registered
2019-11-04
Start date
2018-09-10
Completion date
2018-12-14
Last updated
2019-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biomechanical; Lesion, Joint Pain, Knee Inflammation

Keywords

Harpagophytum, Zingiber officinae, Bixa orellana, Joint pain, Inflammation, Biomechanics

Brief summary

The study will assess running biomechanics and joint inflammation of physically active males between 40 and 60 years of age, mainly runners, suffering from knee joint inflammation and pain after training. Participants were split into two groups, intervention and placebo, to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Exten(d) supplementation during 4 weeks.

Detailed description

Triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, pilot safety, and efficacy study. 30 healthy physically active males (40 to 60 years old) suffering from knee joint inflammation and pain after training were randomly assigned to the Exten(d) or Placebo group. During the first visit and after 4 weeks supplementation (either 2 g daily of Exten(d) capsules or placebo capsules) the participants were subjected to a three-stage exercise session: (i) running biomechanical assessment, (ii) exercise physiology maximal effort test and (iii) running biomechanical assessment after the incremental exercise to exhaustion. The volunteers have been assessed to determine: (1) inflammation by I-R thermography and pain perception, (2) running technics though biomechanic analysis and (3) performance.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPolyherbal Exten(d) vs Placebo

Supplementation during 4 weeks

Sponsors

Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
CollaboratorOTHER
Natural Origins
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Each pill bottle was assigned a five characters numeric code and a letter (A or B). Then, the codes were randomly distributed to the participants. Once the study finished, an external person to the study revealed the placebo and controlled group for each letter.

Intervention model description

Single dose, Randomized, triple Blinded, Placebo-controlled Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male recreational runners who run for at least 150 minutes per week divided into two or more sessions. * The participants were expected to describe some degree of knee inflammation and/or discomfort after training in order to be accepted. Knee discomfort was considered significant whenever a subject referred to a punctuation of ≥ 2 in a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). * Agree not to initiate any new exercise or diet programs during the entire study period * Agree not to change their current diet or exercise program during the entire study period * Agree not to stretch, utilize ice massage, take anti-inflammatory medications (eg, aspirin, ibuprofen), or use any other treatment during the trial.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of anti-inflammatory medications or pain medications 1 week before the screening visit and during the study * Daily use of dietary supplements and herbal supplements beginning at the screening visit and during the study * Antibiotic use in the past 3 months * Chronic disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects of Exten(d) herbal blend on knee and popliteus inflammationChanges from baseline at week 4Knee and popliteus inflammation assessment by IR Thermography after the warm-up, after the first Biomechanical test, after the incremental test to exhaustion and after the second biomechanical test.
Effects of Exten(d) on biomechanicals running techniqueChanges from baseline running technique at week 4Biomechanics techniques assessment by VICON technology before and after the incremental test to exhaustion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VO2maxChanges from baseline at week 4VO2max assessment during an incremental test to exhaustion on a computerized treadmill. Expired gases measurment by a Jaeger Oxycon Pro gas analyser during the incremental test
knee pain perceptionChanges from baseline at week 4Visual Analogue Scale pain perception
Enzymes safety variablesChanges from baseline at week 4Blood based biomarkers assay for liver injury enzymes (Alanine transaminase GPT, Aspartate transaminase GOT, Gamma glutamyl-transpeptidase GGT) and muscle injury CPK (IU/L)
Hematological variablesChanges from baseline at week 4Changes in the hematological profile
Biochemical variablesChanges from baseline at week 4Changes in metabolic biomarkers: total Bilirubin, Urea, Albumin, Creatinin, Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, TG
Impedancemetric variablesChanges from baseline at week 4Body composition assessment (DXA): fat mass, lean mass, total water (%), muscle mass (kg)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026