Skip to content

Study on the Effect of a Physical Training Structured Program After a Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Multicenter, Randomize Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Physical Training Structured Program After a Pulmonary Thromboembolism in the Restoration Lung Perfusion

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04150003
Acronym
TEP-RR
Enrollment
144
Registered
2019-11-04
Start date
2019-11-01
Completion date
2022-01-01
Last updated
2021-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

Venous Thromboembolic Disease, Pulmonary Embolism, Rehabilitation program, Exercise training

Brief summary

Exercise training, as the core component of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation program, may help restore arterial blood flow in the lungs of patients who had suffered Pulmonary Embolism (PE), stimulating and promoting vasodilator effects, repairing the damaged endothelium and recruiting new blood vessels and also inducing a net fibrinolytic balance. Besides, exercise training could have a positive effect on quality of life of these patients.

Detailed description

An experimental multicenter study is proposed , randomized according to parallel assignation and blinded to third ones to evaluate the effect of a 10-weeks structured exercise-based intervention protocol on the restoration of lung blood flow after an acute PE. Main objective is to compare the efficacy and safety in terms of quantitative measures from lung scintigraphy, of lung perfusion versus usual care in patients with PE. Additionally the study is aimed to identify bio-markers of response to treatment (mRNAs, MPs and proteomic approach) and to analyze the effects of training on exercise capacity, quality of life parameters and anxiety depression scores.

Interventions

Structured rehabilitation program of directed exercises

OTHERUsual care

Usual care for patients who had suffered a Pulmonary Embolism

Sponsors

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients 18 years or older at PE diagnosis PE diagnosis confirmed by imaging tests according guidelines Patients under correct anticoagulant treatment Persistent Lung Perfusion Defects at one month after PE diagnosis. Signed Consent Inform

Exclusion criteria

Incidental or silent PE Pregnant or puerperal woman Life expectancy less than 6 months Severe comorbidities (NYHA 4 in severe heart failure; COPD, gold D; severe psychiatric illness) Any disability for physical exercise according to their doctors \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the rate of lung perfusion defects after PEBaseline up to one month after the episode of PE, final after 12 weeks of randomizationLung scintigraphy of lung perfusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Identification of biomarkers of response to treatmentThe day the randomization occurs and the final visit after 12 weeks of the randomizationChanges from baseline in the determination of mRNAs
Identification of another biomarkers of response to treatmentThe day the randomization occurs and the final visit after 12 weeks of the randomizationChanges from baseline in the determination of MPs (Microparticle (MP) Microparticles (MPs)
Change in the percent predicted peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) after PEBaseline up to one month after the episode of PE, final after 12 weeks of randomizationPeak Oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) is obtained from Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test
Change in the EuroQol scaleBaseline up to one month after the episode of PE, final after 12 weeks of randomizationVisual analog score (0-100, lower score indicate worse outcome)
Change in the PEmb-QoL questionnaire by a PEmb-QoL -Baseline up to one month after the episode of PE, final after 12 weeks of randomizationPEmb-QoL summary score (0-100, higher score indicate worse outcome)

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactRemedios Otero, Md-PHd
remeotero@gmail.com0034955012144
Backup ContactClara Rosso-Fernández, MD-PhD
claram.rosso.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es0034955012144

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026