Skip to content

Sphenopalatine Blockade Versus Clinical Treatment

COMPARATION BETWEEN SPHENOPALATINE BLOCK AND MULTIMODAL CLINICAL TREATMENT IN TREATMENT OF HEADACHE AFTER DURAL PUNCTION IN PREGNANT WOMEN.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04148846
Enrollment
45
Registered
2019-11-04
Start date
2019-09-20
Completion date
2021-02-15
Last updated
2019-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Headache, Post-Dural Puncture

Brief summary

Post-dural puncture headache leads to high morbidity and cost to the health system. Pregnant women have a higher incidence than other population groups. There are several treatments for post dural puncture headache mentioned in the literature, not all well established, with a wide heterogeneity of treatment between services. Sphenopalatine block then appears as an alternative treatment, having been described as effective in reports and case series, requiring comparative experimental studies.

Detailed description

Post-dural puncture headache leads to high morbidity and cost to the health system. Pregnant women have a higher incidence than other population groups. There are several treatments for post dural puncture headache mentioned in the literature, not all well established, with a wide heterogeneity of treatment between services. Sphenopalatine block then appears as an alternative treatment, having been described as effective in reports and case series, requiring comparative experimental studies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of sphenopalatine blockade in combination with multimodal treatment in reducing the incidence of epidural blood patch and pain intensity in patients who develop headache after dural puncture, compared with the clinical treatment in our service. METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical, analytical study will be conducted at the Obstetric Center of the Central Institute of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas (ICHC-FMUSP). Women will be included who will undergo neuroaxis block for cesarean section, vaginal delivery or uterine curettage, and who later present headache after dural puncture, after evaluation and diagnosis by anesthesiologist. The patients will be divided into three groups at random. In group I, patients will receive clinical treatment according to the institution's old protocol for post dural puncture headache. In group II, patients will receive clinical treatment, according to the new protocol of the institution. In group III patients will receive clinical treatment, according to the new protocol of the institution, associated with sphenopalatine block. They will be reevaluated after 12, 24 and 48 hours, and a visual analog scale will be applied to evaluate improvement. The pain will be quantified before and after treatment. Pain intensity will be evaluated by verbal numerical scale (EVN), incidence of need for epidural blood buffer in each group, as well as length of hospital stay (in days).

Interventions

DRUGDexamethasone

Dexamethasone 4mg 8 / 8h for 48h orally

DRUGTheophylline

Theophylline 200mg, 12 / 12h, for 5 days, orally

Dipyrone 2g, 6 / 6h for 7 days, orally or intravenous

The sphenopalatine block will be performed with the patient in the supine position, with neck extended. Following topical anesthesia of the nasal vestibules with one application of 10% lidocaine spray and one application of 2% lidocaine gel in each nostril, two long cotton swab applicators embedded in 2% lidocaine jelly, one in each nostril, will be introduced. They will be advanced at a 45-degree angle to the floor of the nose until resistance is encountered, indicating that the swab is in the posterior nasopharyngeal wall, superior to the middle nasal concha. It will be held in this position for 5 minutes and then removed. Thereafter, a 14 gauge, non-cutting, teflon blunt catheter will be introduced into each nostril at a 45 ° angle to the hard palate until it touches the posterior wall of the nasopharynx. For it will be applied 2ml of 0.375% Ropivacaine, on each side, slowly.

DRUGKetoprofen

Ketoprofen 100 mg, 12 / 12h for 5 days, orally or intravenous

DRUGGabapentin

Gabapentin 300 mg 8 / 8h for 7 days orally

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTEspresso coffee

Espresso coffee 20ml, 5x / day, for 7 days

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The patients will be randomly divided into three groups according to the reduced distribution of use of the site www.randomization.com to be conducted prior to the commencement of surveys and data collection. Each patient is given an identification number following a search entry order, and this number is already available through prior randomization linked to one of the three intervention groups. The professional who administers as drugs will be external to the research group and may cause non-burdensome form. Researchers who perform the evaluations of the researched variables can obtain the following results for the intervention performed.

Intervention model description

A prospective randomized clinical, analytical study will be conducted at the Obstetric Center of the Central Institute of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine Clinical Hospital (ICHC-FMUSP). Postpartum women undergoing neuraxial block for cesarean section, vaginal delivery or uterine curettage, and who later present with cerebrospinal fluid hypotension, will be studied after evaluation and diagnosis by anesthesiologist. The research will be submitted for evaluation by the Research Ethics Committees, according to resolution 196/96. Patients will be approached as to the eligibility of their participation in the study, and after the necessary clarifications, will authorize or not the proposed interventions and data collection, by signing the Informed Consent Form.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women who will undergo neuroaxis block for cesarean section, vaginal delivery or uterine curettage, and who later present with cerebrospinal fluid hypotension headache, after evaluation and diagnosis by anesthesiologist.

Exclusion criteria

* patients previously diagnosed with chronic headache; patients with contraindication for neuraxial anesthesia, patients with contraindication for any drugs involved in the study and users of psychotropic intravenous drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scores2 daysHeadache intensity will be assessed using a numerical verbal scale (EVN) from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain. Patients will quantify pain before and after treatment. Will be reevaluated after 12, 24 and 48 hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction with treatment2 daysSatisfaction with pain management will be assessed using a numerical scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being unsatisfied and 10 being complete satisfaction. Will be reevaluated after 12, 24 and 48 hours.
Basic newborn care2 daysAt each moment of evaluation, patients will be asked about any difficulty in breastfeeding or performing basic newborn care.
Blood patch incidence2 daysThe incidence of blood patch in each group will be quantified if necessary.
Length of hospital stay2 daysEvaluate how long hospital stay of each patient.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactHermann S Fernandes, PhD
hermann.fernandes@hc.fm.usp.br+55 84 988966348
Backup ContactMarina Ballarin, MD
mballarinalbino@gmail.com+55 11 971274048

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026