Sexual Violence
Conditions
Keywords
Behavioral intervention, Violent behavior
Brief summary
This study is a randomized controlled trial using a web-based adaptation of the RealConsent program among eligible college men in Hanoi, Vietnam. This study will test the impact of the program on promoting prosocial bystander behavior and preventing sexual violence perpetration, through improvements in the seven knowledge, attitudinal, and emotional mediators over a seven month study period, with a baseline survey and two follow-up surveys.
Detailed description
Sexual violence is any sexual act committed against a person without freely given consent. Men and women may experience sexual violence, but most victims are women. Women's first experiences of sexual violence often occur in adolescence. In Asia and the Pacific, about 14% of sexually experienced adolescent girls report forced sexual debut. Thus, early prevention with men is critical; yet, young men often are difficult to reach and may resist programs that target sexual violence, not seeing themselves as potential perpetrators. Prevention with men that integrates a bystander framework, which treats men as allies of women, is one way to target attitudes and behaviors while decreasing resistance to participation. In this study, the researchers will adapt an existing program for use with men attending one of two universities in Hanoi, Vietnam. This study will test the impact of the adapted program on knowledge/attitudinal/emotional mediators, and in turn, on sexual violence perpetration and prosocial bystander behavior in this target group. The adapted program is a novel, six-session, web-based serial drama and educational program designed to prevent sexual violence perpetration and to enhance prosocial bystander behavior in young men. The program has reduced the incidence of sexual violence among men attending an urban, public university in the Southeastern United States. After conducting interviews with men and women, and focus group discussions with college men and university stakeholders the researchers will produce a web-based adaptation of the RealConsent program in Vietnam. The researchers will then conduct a randomized controlled trial to test the impact of the adapted program, relative to a health-education control condition, on knowledge/attitudinal/emotional mediators, and in turn, on sexually violent behaviors, and prosocial bystander behavior in freshmen men attending two universities in Hanoi. This project will be the first to adapt and to test the impact of a novel, theoretically grounded, web-based intervention to prevent sexual violence perpetration and to promote prosocial bystander behavior among young men for use in a middle-income country. If this study shows that the adapted program is effective cross-culturally, it will have exceptional potential for scale-up to prevent men's perpetration of sexual violence against women globally.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALAdapted RealConsent
The program is a novel, theory-driven, evidence-based serial drama and educational program tailored to young men and delivered in six episodes via the web. Participants will view six 30-minute modules designed to prevent sexual violence in young men
BEHAVIORALHealth Education Control Condition
Participants will view six 30-minute web-based serial drama modules designed to promote health.
Sponsors
Center for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population
Emory University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Identifying as heterosexual or bisexual * Enrolled as a freshman at Hanoi Medical University or Thang Long University on 9/1/2019
Exclusion criteria
* None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Physical Tactics | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | Acts of contact sexual violence using physical tactics (force or threat of harm) were assessed using 7 items from the Sexual Experiences Survey. The 7 items are scored on a scale from 0 (zero acts) to 3 (multiple acts), indicating how many times the participant reported engaging in a specific tactic in order to engage in contact sexual violence, including unwanted touching, rape, and attempted rape. The numbers of participants indicating they used physical tactics at least once (scores of 1 or 2) to perpetrate any of seven acts of contact physical violence (in the past twelve months, for the baseline assessment, or since last completing the questionnaire) are presented here. |
| Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Non-physical Tactics | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | Acts of contact sexual violence using non-physical tactics (verbal coercion, lying, or intoxication) were assessed using 7 items from the Sexual Experiences Survey. The 7 items are scored on a scale from 0 (zero tactics) to 3 (multiple tactics), indicating how many times the participant reported engaging in a specific tactic in order to engage in contact sexual violence, including unwanted touching, rape, and attempted rape. The numbers of participants indicating they used non-physical tactics at least once (scores of 1 or 2) to perpetrate any of seven acts of contact physical violence (in the past twelve months, for the baseline assessment, or since last completing the questionnaire) are presented here. |
| Number of Participants Reporting Non-contact Sexual Violence | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | Acts of non-contact sexual violence were assessed using 10 items from the Sexual Experiences Survey. The 10 items are scored on a scale from 0 (zero acts) to 3 (multiple acts), indicating how many times the participant reported engaging in an act. The numbers of participants indicating they engaged in at least one act of non-contact sexually violent behavior (scores of 1 or 2) in the past twelve months, for the baseline assessment, or since last completing the questionnaire are presented here. |
| Number of Participants Reporting Prosocial Bystander Behavior | Six months following baseline | Participants were asked if they had engaged in any of four prosocial bystander behaviors in the past 12 months (or since the last time completing the questionnaire). Items are scored as 0 = never performed, 1 = performed once, 2 = performed more than once. The numbers of participants who report engaging in at least one of four prosocial bystander behaviors at least once are presented here. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gender Roles Score | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | The Gender Role Attitudes (GRA) scale measures men's gender role attitudes. The fifteen-item scale was adapted from the Gender Equitable Men (GEM) scale, a scale that was adapted for use in Nepal from the GEM scale, the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI)-Adolescent-revised scale, the Gender Attitudes Scale, and the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES). Example items included: A woman should obey her husband even when she disagrees with him and Men should be the ones to initiate dating relationships. Response options were coded using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from totally agree (1) to totally disagree (5). Two items needed to be reverse coded to maintain common valence, and all items were re-coded to range from 0-4, resulting in a theoretical score range of 0-60, with higher scores indicating more equitable attitudes. |
| Myths and Realities About Sexual Violence Score | Baseline, Posttest (immediately after completing the intervention), 6 Months after intervention | Beliefs about what other men think about myths and realities of sexual violence was to be assessed with 24 items asking respondents to indicate how much they agree with each statement. Responses were to be given on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = totally agree and 5 = totally disagree. Total scores range from 24 to 120 with lower scores indicating that the respondent thinks men his age agree more with myths concerning sexual violence. |
| Alcohol and Consent Score | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | Beliefs about consent in terms of alcohol use are assessed with 5 items adapted from the College Date Rape Attitudes and Behaviors scale where respondents indicate how much they agree with each statement. Responses are on a scale from 1 = totally agree to 5 = totally disagree. Items were re-coded to be grounded at zero. Total scores range from 0 to 20 where higher scores indicate more understanding of sexual consent under the influence of alcohol. |
| Sexual Violence Myths Score | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | Rape attitudes were assessed with 28 items presenting myths about rape. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = totally agree and 5 = totally disagree. The Rape Myth Attitudes (RMA) scale measures the extent of men's endorsement (or non-endorsement) of common rape myths. This scale was adapted from fourteen items of the Illinois Rape Myth Scale-Short Form and eleven items of the College Date Rape Attitude and Behavior Survey. Example items included: When guys rape, it is usually because of their strong desire for sex and In most cases when a woman was raped, she was asking for it. Several items were reverse-coded to maintain common valence, and all response options were re-coded 0-4, resulting in a theoretical range of 0-112, with higher scores indicating less endorsement of rape myths. |
| Sexual Coercion Score | Baseline, Posttest (immediately after completing the intervention), 6 Months after intervention | This 19-item scale was adapted from the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships scale. Examples of items in the scale included: Saying that a person would have sex with you if they truly love you and Asking your dating partner repeatedly to perform a sexual act after they have said that they do not want to. Response options were coded into No (0), Yes (1) and Unsure (2). Three items had to be reverse coded to maintain common valence. For analysis, No and Unsure were re-coded into one response option. Scores range from 0-19. Higher scores indicate a greater understanding of behaviors that are sexually coercive. |
| Rape Empathy Score | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | Empathy for rape victims was assessed with a modified version of the Rape Empathy Scale (RES). This assessment includes 17 items where participants were asked to choose between two statements, one of which reflected greater empathy towards rapists (I understand the helplessness a rapist might feel during a rape, since he cannot control his actions) and one of which reflected greater empathy towards victims (I understand the helplessness a victim might feel during a rape). Responses are scored as 1 (more empathy for victim) or 0 (more empathy for perpetrator) and total scores range from 0 to 17 where higher scores indicate more empathy towards rape victims. |
| Knowledge of Legal Definitions of Assault and Rape Scale Score | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | Knowledge of the law is assessed with 22 items where respondents indicate if they think the situations described are illegal (scored as 1), legal, but harmful (2), or not sexual violence (3), with example items including Forcing a person to have oral sex and Pressuring someone to have sex. Items were re-coded such that responses indicating an accurate estimate or overestimate of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as 1 and items indicating an underestimation as of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as 0. Total scores range from 0 to 22 with higher scores indicating greater awareness of laws and consequences related to sexual violence. |
| Knowledge of Informed Consent to Have Sex Score | Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention | Knowledge of sexual consent is assessed with 15 items where respondents indicate how much they agree with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = totally agree and 5 = totally disagree. This scale was adapted from fifteen items of the Sexual Consent Attitudes and Behaviors scale. Example items include The need to ask for sexual consent DECREASES as the length of a dating relationship INCREASES and If your partner initiates sexual contact, it is okay to continue, even if she/he is drunk. Several items were reverse-coded to maintain common valence, and all response options were re-coded to range from 0-4. Total scores range from 0 to 60 where higher scores indicate greater knowledge about sexual consent. |
Countries
Vietnam
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition Participants in the control arm received a health promotion program where they watched six 30-minute web-based serial drama modules designed to promote health. | 397 |
| RealConsent Participants randomized to this study arm received the adapted program of RealConsent. The RealConsent program is a novel, theory-driven, evidence-based serial drama and educational program tailored to young men and delivered in six episodes via the web. Participants viewed six 30-minute modules designed to prevent sexual violence in young men. | 396 |
| Total | 793 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Health Education Control Condition | Total | RealConsent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 18.06 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.32 | 18.06 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45 | 18.07 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.44 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 397 Participants | 793 Participants | 396 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Vietnam | 397 participants | 793 participants | 396 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 397 Participants | 793 Participants | 396 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 397 | 0 / 396 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 397 | 0 / 396 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 397 | 0 / 396 |
Outcome results
Primary
Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Non-physical Tactics
Acts of contact sexual violence using non-physical tactics (verbal coercion, lying, or intoxication) were assessed using 7 items from the Sexual Experiences Survey. The 7 items are scored on a scale from 0 (zero tactics) to 3 (multiple tactics), indicating how many times the participant reported engaging in a specific tactic in order to engage in contact sexual violence, including unwanted touching, rape, and attempted rape. The numbers of participants indicating they used non-physical tactics at least once (scores of 1 or 2) to perpetrate any of seven acts of contact physical violence (in the past twelve months, for the baseline assessment, or since last completing the questionnaire) are presented here.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Non-physical Tactics | Baseline | 41 Participants |
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Non-physical Tactics | Immediately post-intervention | 65 Participants |
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Non-physical Tactics | 6 months post-intervention | 64 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Non-physical Tactics | Baseline | 48 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Non-physical Tactics | Immediately post-intervention | 47 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Non-physical Tactics | 6 months post-intervention | 51 Participants |
Primary
Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Physical Tactics
Acts of contact sexual violence using physical tactics (force or threat of harm) were assessed using 7 items from the Sexual Experiences Survey. The 7 items are scored on a scale from 0 (zero acts) to 3 (multiple acts), indicating how many times the participant reported engaging in a specific tactic in order to engage in contact sexual violence, including unwanted touching, rape, and attempted rape. The numbers of participants indicating they used physical tactics at least once (scores of 1 or 2) to perpetrate any of seven acts of contact physical violence (in the past twelve months, for the baseline assessment, or since last completing the questionnaire) are presented here.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Physical Tactics | 6 months post-intervention | 39 Participants |
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Physical Tactics | Baseline | 23 Participants |
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Physical Tactics | Immediately post-intervention | 46 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Physical Tactics | Baseline | 32 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Physical Tactics | Immediately post-intervention | 35 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Contact Sexual Violence Via Physical Tactics | 6 months post-intervention | 31 Participants |
Primary
Number of Participants Reporting Non-contact Sexual Violence
Acts of non-contact sexual violence were assessed using 10 items from the Sexual Experiences Survey. The 10 items are scored on a scale from 0 (zero acts) to 3 (multiple acts), indicating how many times the participant reported engaging in an act. The numbers of participants indicating they engaged in at least one act of non-contact sexually violent behavior (scores of 1 or 2) in the past twelve months, for the baseline assessment, or since last completing the questionnaire are presented here.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Non-contact Sexual Violence | Baseline | 90 Participants |
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Non-contact Sexual Violence | Immediately post-intervention | 70 Participants |
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Non-contact Sexual Violence | 6 months post-intervention | 65 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Non-contact Sexual Violence | Baseline | 99 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Non-contact Sexual Violence | Immediately post-intervention | 56 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Non-contact Sexual Violence | 6 months post-intervention | 55 Participants |
Primary
Number of Participants Reporting Prosocial Bystander Behavior
Participants were asked if they had engaged in any of four prosocial bystander behaviors in the past 12 months (or since the last time completing the questionnaire). Items are scored as 0 = never performed, 1 = performed once, 2 = performed more than once. The numbers of participants who report engaging in at least one of four prosocial bystander behaviors at least once are presented here.
Time frame: Six months following baseline
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Prosocial Bystander Behavior | Baseline | 258 Participants |
| Health Education Control Condition | Number of Participants Reporting Prosocial Bystander Behavior | 6 months post-intervention | 170 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Prosocial Bystander Behavior | Baseline | 258 Participants |
| RealConsent | Number of Participants Reporting Prosocial Bystander Behavior | 6 months post-intervention | 203 Participants |
Secondary
Alcohol and Consent Score
Beliefs about consent in terms of alcohol use are assessed with 5 items adapted from the College Date Rape Attitudes and Behaviors scale where respondents indicate how much they agree with each statement. Responses are on a scale from 1 = totally agree to 5 = totally disagree. Items were re-coded to be grounded at zero. Total scores range from 0 to 20 where higher scores indicate more understanding of sexual consent under the influence of alcohol.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Alcohol and Consent Score | Baseline | 14.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.88 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Alcohol and Consent Score | Immediately post-intervention | 14.18 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.77 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Alcohol and Consent Score | 6 months post-intervention | 14.30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| RealConsent | Alcohol and Consent Score | Baseline | 15.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
| RealConsent | Alcohol and Consent Score | Immediately post-intervention | 15.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.38 |
| RealConsent | Alcohol and Consent Score | 6 months post-intervention | 15.06 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.52 |
Secondary
Gender Roles Score
The Gender Role Attitudes (GRA) scale measures men's gender role attitudes. The fifteen-item scale was adapted from the Gender Equitable Men (GEM) scale, a scale that was adapted for use in Nepal from the GEM scale, the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI)-Adolescent-revised scale, the Gender Attitudes Scale, and the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES). Example items included: A woman should obey her husband even when she disagrees with him and Men should be the ones to initiate dating relationships. Response options were coded using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from totally agree (1) to totally disagree (5). Two items needed to be reverse coded to maintain common valence, and all items were re-coded to range from 0-4, resulting in a theoretical score range of 0-60, with higher scores indicating more equitable attitudes.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Gender Roles Score | Baseline | 38.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.14 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Gender Roles Score | Immediately post-intervention | 36.15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.08 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Gender Roles Score | 6 months post-intervention | 35.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.72 |
| RealConsent | Gender Roles Score | Baseline | 38.82 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.53 |
| RealConsent | Gender Roles Score | Immediately post-intervention | 37.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.1 |
| RealConsent | Gender Roles Score | 6 months post-intervention | 36.77 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.61 |
Secondary
Knowledge of Informed Consent to Have Sex Score
Knowledge of sexual consent is assessed with 15 items where respondents indicate how much they agree with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = totally agree and 5 = totally disagree. This scale was adapted from fifteen items of the Sexual Consent Attitudes and Behaviors scale. Example items include The need to ask for sexual consent DECREASES as the length of a dating relationship INCREASES and If your partner initiates sexual contact, it is okay to continue, even if she/he is drunk. Several items were reverse-coded to maintain common valence, and all response options were re-coded to range from 0-4. Total scores range from 0 to 60 where higher scores indicate greater knowledge about sexual consent.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Knowledge of Informed Consent to Have Sex Score | Baseline | 34.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.31 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Knowledge of Informed Consent to Have Sex Score | Immediately post-intervention | 33.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.06 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Knowledge of Informed Consent to Have Sex Score | 6 months post-intervention | 33.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.51 |
| RealConsent | Knowledge of Informed Consent to Have Sex Score | Baseline | 35.05 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.83 |
| RealConsent | Knowledge of Informed Consent to Have Sex Score | Immediately post-intervention | 35.81 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.68 |
| RealConsent | Knowledge of Informed Consent to Have Sex Score | 6 months post-intervention | 35.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
Secondary
Knowledge of Legal Definitions of Assault and Rape Scale Score
Knowledge of the law is assessed with 22 items where respondents indicate if they think the situations described are illegal (scored as 1), legal, but harmful (2), or not sexual violence (3), with example items including Forcing a person to have oral sex and Pressuring someone to have sex. Items were re-coded such that responses indicating an accurate estimate or overestimate of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as 1 and items indicating an underestimation as of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as 0. Total scores range from 0 to 22 with higher scores indicating greater awareness of laws and consequences related to sexual violence.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Knowledge of Legal Definitions of Assault and Rape Scale Score | Baseline | 16.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.72 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Knowledge of Legal Definitions of Assault and Rape Scale Score | Immediately post-intervention | 18.01 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.31 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Knowledge of Legal Definitions of Assault and Rape Scale Score | 6 months post-intervention | 18.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.51 |
| RealConsent | Knowledge of Legal Definitions of Assault and Rape Scale Score | Baseline | 17.02 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.52 |
| RealConsent | Knowledge of Legal Definitions of Assault and Rape Scale Score | Immediately post-intervention | 18.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.02 |
| RealConsent | Knowledge of Legal Definitions of Assault and Rape Scale Score | 6 months post-intervention | 18.58 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.05 |
Secondary
Myths and Realities About Sexual Violence Score
Beliefs about what other men think about myths and realities of sexual violence was to be assessed with 24 items asking respondents to indicate how much they agree with each statement. Responses were to be given on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = totally agree and 5 = totally disagree. Total scores range from 24 to 120 with lower scores indicating that the respondent thinks men his age agree more with myths concerning sexual violence.
Time frame: Baseline, Posttest (immediately after completing the intervention), 6 Months after intervention
Population: Data for this outcome were not collected as the items performed poorly during pilot testing and this questionnaire was not administered to study participants.
Secondary
Rape Empathy Score
Empathy for rape victims was assessed with a modified version of the Rape Empathy Scale (RES). This assessment includes 17 items where participants were asked to choose between two statements, one of which reflected greater empathy towards rapists (I understand the helplessness a rapist might feel during a rape, since he cannot control his actions) and one of which reflected greater empathy towards victims (I understand the helplessness a victim might feel during a rape). Responses are scored as 1 (more empathy for victim) or 0 (more empathy for perpetrator) and total scores range from 0 to 17 where higher scores indicate more empathy towards rape victims.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Rape Empathy Score | Baseline | 11.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Rape Empathy Score | Immediately post-intervention | 11.41 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.99 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Rape Empathy Score | 6 months post-intervention | 11.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.17 |
| RealConsent | Rape Empathy Score | Baseline | 11.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.73 |
| RealConsent | Rape Empathy Score | Immediately post-intervention | 12.01 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.27 |
| RealConsent | Rape Empathy Score | 6 months post-intervention | 11.97 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.47 |
Secondary
Sexual Coercion Score
This 19-item scale was adapted from the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships scale. Examples of items in the scale included: Saying that a person would have sex with you if they truly love you and Asking your dating partner repeatedly to perform a sexual act after they have said that they do not want to. Response options were coded into No (0), Yes (1) and Unsure (2). Three items had to be reverse coded to maintain common valence. For analysis, No and Unsure were re-coded into one response option. Scores range from 0-19. Higher scores indicate a greater understanding of behaviors that are sexually coercive.
Time frame: Baseline, Posttest (immediately after completing the intervention), 6 Months after intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Sexual Coercion Score | Baseline | 5.74 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.59 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Sexual Coercion Score | Immediately post-intervention | 5.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.71 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Sexual Coercion Score | 6 months post-intervention | 5.54 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.74 |
| RealConsent | Sexual Coercion Score | 6 months post-intervention | 5.90 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.18 |
| RealConsent | Sexual Coercion Score | Baseline | 5.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.69 |
| RealConsent | Sexual Coercion Score | Immediately post-intervention | 6.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.39 |
Secondary
Sexual Violence Myths Score
Rape attitudes were assessed with 28 items presenting myths about rape. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = totally agree and 5 = totally disagree. The Rape Myth Attitudes (RMA) scale measures the extent of men's endorsement (or non-endorsement) of common rape myths. This scale was adapted from fourteen items of the Illinois Rape Myth Scale-Short Form and eleven items of the College Date Rape Attitude and Behavior Survey. Example items included: When guys rape, it is usually because of their strong desire for sex and In most cases when a woman was raped, she was asking for it. Several items were reverse-coded to maintain common valence, and all response options were re-coded 0-4, resulting in a theoretical range of 0-112, with higher scores indicating less endorsement of rape myths.
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 3 week intervention, 6 months after completing the intervention
Population: This analysis includes participants who completed the assessments at the indicated time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Education Control Condition | Sexual Violence Myths Score | Baseline | 40.38 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.83 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Sexual Violence Myths Score | Immediately post-intervention | 39.95 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.02 |
| Health Education Control Condition | Sexual Violence Myths Score | 6 months post-intervention | 41.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.13 |
| RealConsent | Sexual Violence Myths Score | Baseline | 40.89 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.47 |
| RealConsent | Sexual Violence Myths Score | Immediately post-intervention | 43.01 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.37 |
| RealConsent | Sexual Violence Myths Score | 6 months post-intervention | 44.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.68 |