Skip to content

OTTAPE : Observatory on the Use of New Therapies (LED Photobiomodulation, Radiofrequency, Laser and Injectable Hyaluronic Acid) in the Treatment of Women's Pelvic-perineal Pathologies After Failure, Partial or Total, of First-line Medical Treatment

OTTAPE : Observatory on the Use of New Therapies (LED Photobiomodulation, Radiofrequency, Laser and Injectable Hyaluronic Acid) in the Treatment of Women's Pelvic-perineal Pathologies After Failure, Partial or Total, of First-line Medical Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04146194
Acronym
OTTAPE
Enrollment
173
Registered
2019-10-31
Start date
2019-12-30
Completion date
2022-10-07
Last updated
2025-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic-perineal Pathology

Brief summary

Women's pelvic-perineal pathologies are a very frequent reason for consultation in gynaecology. The symptoms reported are diverse and range from the most frequent (genital prolapse, urinary or anal incontinence, dysuria, chronic pain) to new complaints (dyspareunia, vaginal laxity, perineum scarring, vulvo-vaginal atrophy). Currently, first-line medical treatments are no longer sufficient to improve patients. New therapies have emerged, namely LED photobiomodulation, radio frequency, Erbium or fractionated CO2 laser and injectable hyaluronic acid. These new treatments have been used in common practice for several years, but no studies have standardized practices. There are no recommendations regarding these new therapies to give specific indications for their use. The aim is to standardise the indications for these new technologies. * LED photobiomodulation: management of scar perineas with pain, scarring disorders or trophic disorders. * The Erbium laser or fractionated CO2: treatment of vulvo-vaginal atrophy. * radiofrequency: management of chronic pelvic-perineal and postpartum pain. * injectable hyaluronic acid: treatment of vestibulodynia and trophic disorders. Non-validated indications are proposed for these therapies (urinary incontinence, vaginal laxity and prolapse)

Detailed description

Initially, this involves the follow-up of patients treated in the Gynaecology-Obstetrics department of the University Hospital of Nîmes and the Karis medical centre of Perpignan for a pelvi-perineal pathology. Other centres will be gradually incremented. Patients will have received a letter of information and no objection to the prospective collection of her data as part of routine management without any other intervention. These patients should not have any contraindications to the use of these new therapies. At inclusion, the patient receives a pelvic-perineal clinical examination and a functional assessment (vaginal sampling), pain (EVA). The FSFI questionnaire will be administered. During this visit, the investigator will set up a treatment with a new therapy. This treatment will be chosen by the operator before recommendations are made. The operator must detail the type of device and the protocol chosen. The patient will be reviewed 4 weeks after the end of her treatment: she will benefit from an evaluation identical in all respects to the inclusion visit with the administration of the PGI-I questionnaire. All information concerning the discontinuation, continuation or change of treatment will be documented in this follow-up phase. In case of failure, second line treatment may be offered. Possible adverse reactions will be collected at all times.

Interventions

OTHERNone. This is a non-interventional observational study.

None. This is a non-interventional observational study.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with pelvic-perineal pathology * Patients who are not opposed to prospective data collection.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with contraindications to these new therapies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Characteristics of patients who are candidates for these new therapies12 monthSet up an observatory to carry out an inventory of the use of these new technologies and provide answers to basic questions: who uses them, for which patients, in which indications and for which therapeutic gain? Collect the practices of professionals and make it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapeutic choice by the physician and the patient.
First-line treatment tried12 monthSet up an observatory to carry out an inventory of the use of these new technologies and provide answers to basic questions: who uses them, for which patients, in which indications and for which therapeutic gain? Collect the practices of professionals and make it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapeutic choice by the physician and the patient.
Type of therapy used and for which type of pathology12 monthSet up an observatory to carry out an inventory of the use of these new technologies and provide answers to basic questions: who uses them, for which patients, in which indications and for which therapeutic gain? Collect the practices of professionals and make it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapeutic choice by the physician and the patient.
Number of sessions performed12 monthSet up an observatory to carry out an inventory of the use of these new technologies and provide answers to basic questions: who uses them, for which patients, in which indications and for which therapeutic gain? Collect the practices of professionals and make it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapeutic choice by the physician and the patient.
Possible use of a second therapy12 monthSet up an observatory to carry out an inventory of the use of these new technologies and provide answers to basic questions: who uses them, for which patients, in which indications and for which therapeutic gain? Collect the practices of professionals and make it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapeutic choice by the physician and the patient.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026