Skip to content

Effectiveness of a Physical Recovery Program for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (3C-CUIDATE)

3C-CUIDATE: Efectividad de un Programa de Recuperación Física en el Tratamiento de Las Secuelas Musculoesqueléticas, Funcionales y de Calidad de Vida en Pacientes de Cáncer de Cabeza y Cuello.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04145180
Acronym
3C-CUIDATE
Enrollment
55
Registered
2019-10-30
Start date
2019-09-02
Completion date
2022-01-30
Last updated
2024-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dysfunction, Head and Neck Cancer, Pain

Keywords

Pain, Function, Quality of Life, Head and Neck Cancer

Brief summary

People receiving a head and neck cancer treatment often do not find an adequate therapeutic response for the side effects derived from this treatment. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a physical recovery program based on manual therapy over these problems. Previous studies have shown the effectiveness of this type of programs on patients who have had cancer in other locations with clinically relevant results. There is a shortage of proposals for this subgroup of patients that require special attention. This project intends to carry out an experimental randomized controlled study with 84 patients treated of head and neck cancer who will be assigned randomly to the study groups: a) manual therapy program or, b) control group. The assessment refers to a baseline form (at the beginning of the study), at 6 weeks and at 6 months of patient follow-up.

Detailed description

Manual therapy program consists of 3 sessions a week during 6 weeks, with a total of 18 appointments. Measurements are done before starting, after the last intervention and 6 months after finishing the treatment.

Interventions

OTHERManual therapy

40 minutes of physiotherapy, based on manual therapy sessions over 6 weeks. Three times a week.

Sponsors

Universidad de Granada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* To have ended their treatment in the previous 6-24 months * To have no metastasis or active cancer * To have cervical and/or temporomandibular joint pain \>3 in a Visual Analogue Scale

Exclusion criteria

* Mental or physical illness preventing subjects from participating in the study * Previous chronic pain conditions * Previous cervical or temporomandibular joint pain * Previous dysphagia disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-related quality of life6 weeksQuestionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 was used for measuring quality of life
Health-related quality of life - 26 weeksQuestionnaire EORTC QLQ-H&N-35 was used for measuring quality of life specifically in survivors of head and neck cancer
Pain Intensity6 weeksVisual Analogue Scale was used for evaluating pain intensity at cervical, temporomandibular joint, face and shoulder levels bilaterally. This consisted of a 10 cm horizontal line with the words no pain at the left extreme (0) and pain as bad as it could be at the right extreme (10)
Pressure pain thresholds6 weeksPressure algometry (Force Dial DFK 20 analogue algometer, Wagner, Greenwich, USA) was assessed over the temporalis, masseter, upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles and the C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint, the sternoclavicular joint and the tibialis anterior muscle as a distant reference muscle.
Shoulder and cervical active range of motion6 weeksShoulder active range of motion (AROM) was assessed with a two-arms goniometer joined by a 360º protractor with the patient lying on a supine position. Cervical AROM was measured in a upright sitting position with a range of motion instrument (Performance Attainment Associates, Spine Products)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Temporomandibular disorders6 weeksThe presence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) was assessed with the Fonseca Anamneses Index, that classifies TMD as no dysfunction, light dysfunction, moderate dysfunction or severe dysfunction
Perceived fatigue6 weeksPiper Fatigue Scale - revised (PFS-r) was used to measure fatigue perception in head and neck cancer patients. It consists of 22 items divided into 4 subscales: behaviour, affection, emotional and cognitive. Each item is evaluated in a Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0 to 10.
Fatigue6 weeksFatigue perceived at the assessment moment was measured with a Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0)no fatigue to 10) maximum fatigue perceived
Sleep quality6 weeksTo evaluate sleep quality, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was the instrument used. It consists of 19 self-rated questions related to sleep quality, including estimates of sleep duration and latency and the frequency and severity of specific sleep-related problems.
Shoulder pain and disability perception6 weeksShoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) was used to evaluate pain and disability perception of the patients at shoulder level.
Anxiety6 weeksPerception of anxiety at the assessment moment was measured with a Visual Analogue Scale rating from 0)no anxiety to 10)maximum anxiety perceived
Swallowing function6 weeksEating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was used to evaluate self-reported swallowing impairments. It is a 5 point Likert scale rating from no impairment to severe problem. The sum of all items contained on the questionnaire is used as the overall score, suggesting an abnormal swallowing when score is higher than 3
Swallowing difficulty6 weeksA Visual Analogue Scale was used to register swallowing difficulties, ranging from 0)no problems to 10)impossible to swallow
Sleeping disorders6 weeksSleeping disorders were evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale rating from 0)no disturbances to 10)impossible to sleep
Isometric handgrip strength6 weeksA digital dynamometer with adjustable grip (TKK 5101 Grip-D; Takei, Tokyo, Japan) was used to assess handgrip strength. Patients were standing in a upright position with the elbow in complete extension. Test was performed 3 times per hand, alternating both hands, with a 1-minute rest between trials.
Deep cervical flexors endurance6 weeksEndurance of deep cervical flexor muscles was assessed with the deep cervical flexor endurance test, with the patient in a supine lying position with the examiner's hands under his/her head and being told to fold the chin completely to the sternum and raising the head as minimum as possible without touching examiner's hands. Time is counted from when the patient lift his/her head until when he/she can no longer maintain the position.
Physical Fitness6 weeksInternational Fitness Scale (IFIS) was used to evaluate perceived physical fitness. It contains 4 physical fitness elements (cardiorespiratory endurance, muscular strength, speed/agility and flexibility) to categorize into 5 options, from very poor to very good
Maximal mouth opening6 weeksMouth opening was evaluated with a sliding calliper measuring the inter-incisor distance asking the patients to open the mouth as maximum as possible

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026