Skip to content

Coolief Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Conventional Radiofrequency to Manage OA Knee Pain

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Single Blind Clinical Trial Comparing COOLIEF* Cooled Radiofrequency to Conventional Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves in the Management of Knee Pain in an Osteoarthritic Patient Population

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04145011
Enrollment
153
Registered
2019-10-30
Start date
2019-10-04
Completion date
2022-10-10
Last updated
2023-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Keywords

Randomized clinical trial, Osteoarthritis, Radiofrequency Ablation, Knee, Genicular, Coolief

Brief summary

This study is being performed to assess the relative effectiveness of genicular nerve ablation with the COOLIEF\* Cooled Radiofrequency probe to manage moderate to severe knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee when compared to radiofrequency ablation using a Standard Radiofrequency probe.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blind comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects with osteoarthritic knee pain undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion of the genicular nerves with either Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation (CRFA) or Conventional (Standard) Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA). Approximately 148 participants from up to 15 sites will be enrolled into this study, with subjects undergoing either CRFA or SRFA in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow-up will be conducted for 24 months post-treatment, with the primary endpoint being completed at month 12. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups to determine success.

Interventions

Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe (18g, 4mm active tip)

DEVICEStandard Radiofrequency

Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via non-cooled standard radiofrequency probe (22g, curved 10mm active tip)

Sponsors

Avanos Medical
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The study is a participant-blinded trial and deliberate action, utilizing a physical barrier, will be needed to ensure the blind remains intact.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 21 years 2. Able to understand and personally sign and date the informed consent form 3. Able to complete outcome measures 4. Chronic knee pain for longer than 6 months that interferes with functional activities (for example, ambulation, prolonged standing, etc.) 5. Continued pain in the target knee despite at least 3 months of conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\]) 6. Positive response (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 50%) to a single genicular nerve block of the index knee 7. Pain on NRS ≥ 6 on an 11-point scale for the index knee 8. Radiologic confirmation of osteoarthritis (x-ray/MRI/CT) grade 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 6 months for the index knee 9. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin (gabapentin) and antidepressants for pain, such as Cymbalta (duloxetine), must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the course of the study without approval of the investigator 10. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for knee pain during the study period 11. Subjects of child bearing potential must be willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method 12. Willingness to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study (24 months regardless of effect of initial therapy)

Exclusion criteria

1. Evidence of inflammatory arthritis (example, rheumatoid arthritis) or other systemic inflammatory condition (example; gout, fibromyalgia, MS, Lupus, etc.) that could cause knee pain 2. Evidence of neuropathic pain affecting the index knee 3. Previous or pending lower limb amputation 4. Intra-articular steroid injection into the index knee within 90 days from randomization 5. Hyaluronic acid injection, platelet rich plasma (PRP), stem cell, or arthroscopic debridement/lavage injection into the index knee within 180 days from randomization 6. Prior radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves of the index knee 7. Prior partial, resurfacing, or total knee arthroplasty of the index knee (residual hardware) 8. Clinically significant ligamentous laxity of the index knee 9. Clinically significant valgus/varus deformities or evidence of pathology (other than osteoarthritis of knee) that materially affects gait or function of the knee or is the underlying cause of the knee pain and/or functional limitations 10. Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2 11. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns 12. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (secondary gain) 13. Pregnant, nursing or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period 14. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction 15. Poorly controlled severe psychiatric illness or ongoing psychological barriers to recovery, as determined by the investigator 16. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures 17. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved) 18. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable 19. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol 20. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse 21. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 60 mg morphine equivalent daily opioid dose 22. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.) 23. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator 24. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation which included therapeutic treatment within 30 days prior to signing informed consent 25. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule, protocol requirements or procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)12 monthsThe proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals no pain and 10 points equals worst pain. There are no sub-scales.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Additional Interventions12 monthsThe proportion of subjects requiring additional intervention for their OA knee pain.
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR)12 monthsThe change in KOOS JR score from baseline. The KOOS JR is a short form of the KOOS that assesses patient stiffness (1 item), pain (4 items), and functions of daily living (2 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating total knee disability and 100 indicating perfect knee health.
EQ-5D-5L12 monthsThe change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating the best study subject condition and 5 indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression
Global Perceived Effect (GPE)12 monthsThe measured Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = worst ever, 2 points = much worse, 3 points = worse, 4 points = not improved but not worse, 5 points = improved, 6 points = much improved, 7 points = best ever. There are no sub-scales.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)24 monthsThe proportion of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ≥ 50% based on the NRS. The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals no pain and 10 points equals worst pain. There are no sub-scales.
Additional Interventions24 monthsThe proportion of subjects requiring additional intervention for their OA knee pain.
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR)24 monthsThe change in KOOS JR score from baseline. The KOOS JR is a short form of the KOOS that assesses patient stiffness (1 item), pain (4 items), and functions of daily living (2 items). Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating total knee disability and 100 indicating perfect knee health.
EQ-5D-5L24 monthsThe change in measured EQ-5D-5L scale from baseline. This outcome instrument is composed of five sub-scales containing five questions each. The point range for each sub-scale is from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating the best study subject condition and 5 indicating the worst study subject condition. Thus, the minimum and maximum scores per sub-scale are 1 and 5, respectively, and such scores for the entire instrument are 5 (best study subject condition) and 25 (worst study subject condition). The sub-scale topics are: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression
Global Perceived Effect (GPE)24 monthsThe measured Global Perceived Effect scale. The Global Perceived Effect is a 7-point scale: 1 point = worst ever, 2 points = much worse, 3 points = worse, 4 points = not improved but not worse, 5 points = improved, 6 points = much improved, 7 points = best ever. There are no sub-scales.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026