Skip to content

Evaluation of Capillary Refill Index

Evaluation of Capillary Refill Index

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04144166
Acronym
CRI
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-10-30
Start date
2019-10-29
Completion date
2019-12-23
Last updated
2021-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perfusion; Complications

Keywords

capillary refill time, peripheral perfusion

Brief summary

Comparison of a peripheral perfusion assessment method using a pulse oximeter to the conventional capillary refill time visually assessed by a clinician.

Detailed description

A new technology, capillary refill index (CRI), to assess peripheral perfusion status quantitatively using pulse oximeter waveforms is being developed. The conventional capillary refill time (CRT) is widely used in clinical settings as a gold standard to assess peripheral perfusion. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capability of CRI to predict altered peripheral perfusion determined with the conventional CRT test. Predictive capability of CRI needs to be assessed to achieve a goal to provide clinicians with an alternative method to the conventional CRT.

Interventions

DEVICEcapillary refill index (CRI)

a waveform analysis method using a pulse oximeter to assess peripheral perfusion

Sponsors

Nihon Kohden
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Individuals 18 years of age or older 2. Patients who present to the ED or who are admitted to the ICU of North Shore University Hospital (NSUH)

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant 2. Prisoners 3. Finger, hand or forearm anatomical anomaly or disease that may interfere with attaching a pulse oximeter sensor 4. Patients' deemed clinically unstable by the clinical team

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Predictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral Perfusion< 30 min *right after enrollmentThe area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis on CRI values to predict probability of altered peripheral perfusion determined with the CRT test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation of Device CRI to Conventional (Visual) CRT< 30 min *right after enrollmentSpearman's correlation coefficient to assess the correlation between CRI and CRT values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects
Adult emergency department (ED) patients, both males and females without regards to ethnic and racial backgrounds. CRT and CRI measurements were conducted with following methods for each subject in a relaxed position (seated or lying down) with relaxed hands. The subject's most accessible hand (right or left) was used. Each measurement of visual CRT and device CRI were performed alternately and were repeated three times each for a total of six compressions per subject. Visual CRT measurement using a stopwatch An investigator (an ED physician) compressed the fingertip of the subject's index or middle finger for five seconds, signaled by start compression and release compression beep sounds. When the fingertip was released from the compression, the investigator began the visual CRT measurement. The investigator held a stopwatch in the hand that did not perform the compression and used this stopwatch to measure CRT. CRI measurement by the investigational device The SpO2 sensor probe was applied to either the index or middle fingertip of the same hand of the subject used in the CRT measurement, depending upon which fingertip was compressed in the CRT measurement. The investigator who measured the visual CRT was blinded from the measured value of the CRI measurement.
57
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDischarged before study start1
Overall StudyNail polish could not be removed from finger1
Overall StudyPregnancy1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects
Age, Continuous49.0 years
Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Scale
Fitzpatrick skin tone - 1
9 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Scale
Fitzpatrick skin tone - 2
13 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Scale
Fitzpatrick skin tone - 3
14 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Scale
Fitzpatrick skin tone - 4
7 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Scale
Fitzpatrick skin tone - 5
7 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Scale
Fitzpatrick skin tone - 6
7 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
No designation
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other/Multiracial
13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 57
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Predictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral Perfusion

The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis on CRI values to predict probability of altered peripheral perfusion determined with the CRT test.

Time frame: < 30 min *right after enrollment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionPredictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral PerfusionOptimal CRI (3.37 s) low peripheral perfusion sensitivity0.89 probability
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionPredictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral PerfusionOptimal CRI (3.37 s) low peripheral perfusion specificity1.00 probability
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionPredictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral PerfusionOptimal CRI (3.37 s) very low peripheral perfusion sensitivity0.94 probability
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionPredictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral PerfusionOptimal CRI (3.37 s) very low peripheral perfusion specificity0.82 probability
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionPredictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral PerfusionAUC low peripheral perfusion (> 2 s)0.986 probability
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionPredictive Capability of the Altered Peripheral PerfusionAUC very low peripheral perfusion (> 3 s)0.910 probability
Secondary

Correlation of Device CRI to Conventional (Visual) CRT

Spearman's correlation coefficient to assess the correlation between CRI and CRT values.

Time frame: < 30 min *right after enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionCorrelation of Device CRI to Conventional (Visual) CRT0.866 Spearman's correlation coefficient
Comparison: Mean value for visual CRT and median value for device CRI were calculated for each participant. 3 values were measured (each) for CRT and CRI. Mean value is equal to SUM(m1,m2,m3)/3.~Median value was then calculated for the set (57) of calculated mean visual CRT and mean device CRI. Median value is equal to the middle value of the series of mean values. All measurements are in units of seconds.See above
Post Hoc

Independence of Age Impact on CRI Measurement for Low Peripheral Perfusion (CRT > 2 Seconds)

Demonstrate that age is not a variant for CRI measurement

Time frame: < 30 min *right after enrollment

Population: Patients \< 60 years vs. \>= 60 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionIndependence of Age Impact on CRI Measurement for Low Peripheral Perfusion (CRT > 2 Seconds)0.992 probabllity
All Subjects < 60 YearsIndependence of Age Impact on CRI Measurement for Low Peripheral Perfusion (CRT > 2 Seconds)0.982 probabllity
Post Hoc

Independence of Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Score on CRI Measurement for Low Peripheral Perfusion (CRT > 2 Seconds)

Demonstrate that skin tone is not a variant for CRI measurement

Time frame: < 30 min *right after enrollment

Population: Subjects with Fitzpatrick skin tone score of 1, 2 or 3 vs. scores of 4, 5, or 6

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sensitivity and Specificity to Predict Low Peripheral PerfusionIndependence of Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Score on CRI Measurement for Low Peripheral Perfusion (CRT > 2 Seconds)0.994 probability
All Subjects < 60 YearsIndependence of Fitzpatrick Skin Tone Score on CRI Measurement for Low Peripheral Perfusion (CRT > 2 Seconds)0.981 probability

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026