Skip to content

Sorafenib Plus TACE Versus Sorafenib Alone as Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment for Resectable Primary Advanced HCC

Sorafenib Plus Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Sorafenib Alone as Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment for Resectable Primary Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04143191
Acronym
SOURCE
Enrollment
158
Registered
2019-10-29
Start date
2019-09-15
Completion date
2023-09-15
Last updated
2020-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Brief summary

This trial is a multi-center, phase III, randomized (1:1) clinical trial. The aim is to explore the efficacy and safety of Sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization as adjuvant treatment for resectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, compared with Sorafenib alone. The primary endpoint is recurrence-free survival. This trial planned to recruit 158 patients who received curative hepatic resection with resectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The patients will be randomized into Sorafenib group and Sorafenib+TACE group as 1:1 ratio.

Interventions

DRUGSorafenib

Sorafenib is one of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The initial dosage is 400mg orally, twice daily.

PROCEDURETransarterial chemoembolization

TACE including conventional TACE (cTACE) and DEB-TACE. Treatment choices are according to the specific condition of each patient and the experience of interventional radiologists.

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Primary hepatocellular carcinoma without any treatments. 2. Received curative hepatic resection 3. ECOG score 0-1 4. Child-Pugh grade A 5. Sufficient liver and kidney function

Exclusion criteria

1. Diffused lesions; tumor thrombosis in SMV or IVC. 2. Extra-hepatic metastasis. 3. Contraindication of TACE, like portal-systemic shunt, obvious atherosclerosis, etc. 4. Allergic to the contrast agent of TACE 5. Dysfunction of liver, kidney or bone marrow. 6. Concomitant other malignant tumor or HIV infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence-free survival2 yearsRecurrence-free survival indicates the interval between randomization and tumor recurrence or death.\[0-2 years\] Longer RFS time indicates better prognosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival2 yearsOverall survival indicates the interval between randomization and death.\[0-2years\]Longer OS time indicates better prognosis.
Time to recurrence2 yearsTime to recurrence indicates the interval between randomization and tumor recurrence.\[0-2years\]Longer TTR time indicates better prognosis.
Severe adverse events2 yearsIncidence rate of severe adverse events. \[0-100%\]. lower rate indicates more safety of the treatment
Quality of life2 yearsQuestionnaire score of EORTC-QOL. Higher score indicates better quality of life

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMing Kuang, MD, PhD.
kuangm@mail.sysu.edu.cn008687755766

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026