Skip to content

Computer-based Tutorial and Automated Speech Recognition for Intravitreal Drug Injections

Computer-based Tutorial and Automated Speech Recognition as Supportive Means to Enhance the Patient Experience and Improve the Efficiency of the Informed Consent Process for Intravitreal Drug Injections

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04142164
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-10-29
Start date
2019-10-24
Completion date
2024-01-01
Last updated
2022-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion

Keywords

Informed Consent Process

Brief summary

Evaluation if a computer-based tutorial (MacInfo tool) improves the patients' knowledge about intravitreal drug injections, associated risks, and the underlying diseases of treatment-naive patients.

Detailed description

Informing the patient an obtaining informed consent is one of the major duties physicians have to perform before beginning a medical treatment. However, patients often experience the informed consent taking as not satisfying. In the past, several approaches were used to try to improve the informed consent taking, such as printed information sheets and multimedia tools. A novel concept introduced several years ago is the utilization of a multimedia tool including a so-called traffic light system. At our clinic, a computer-based tutorial for informed consent of patients undergoing cataract surgery (CatInfo tool) was developed and tested. The patients see and hear a presentation covering the topics of cataract disease, the surgery, and associated risks and complications. After each chapter a graphic representation of a traffic light is shown on the screen. At this page the patient has three choices: if the patient understood everything and wish to continue, the green bar has to be clicked; if there are further questions, the patient clicks the yellow bar; or if the patient wishes to repeat the chapter due to any reason, the patient clicks the red bar. In previous studies, it was shown that patients who used the CatInfo tool had better knowledge about cataract surgery compared to the ones that saw a placebo video. Furthermore, the overall satisfaction of patients with the CatInfo tool was high (median 9.1 of 10 measured with a visual analogue scale). Since many cataract patients benefited from using the CatInfo tool, the idea arose to create and test a similar multimedia information tool for patients receiving a drug injection into the vitreous of the eye for treatment of retinal diseases (e.g. patients suffering from neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, or retinal venous occlusive disease). Therefore, the MacInfo tool was developed as a multidisciplinary project including patients, graphic designers, and ophthalmologists. Furthermore, it would be helpful for the physician to have a legal valid and written documentation of the informed consent process, serving as proof that the patient was informed correctly about all necessary topics concerning the medical treatment, expected benefits, risks, complications, etc. A novel and technology-driven approach may be the use of Automated Speech Recognition (ASR). ASR records the informed consent discussion, followed by an algorithmic analysis of the conversation, and a subsequent translation of the interaction into a legally valid document. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the MacInfo tool improves the patients' knowledge about intravitreal drug injections, associated risks and the underlying diseases of treatment-naive patients and if ASR is a suitable technology for improving informed consent process documentation in daily routine.

Interventions

OTHERMacInfo presentation

Presentation about intravitreal drug injection

Placebo presentation

Sponsors

Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 105 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 21 or older * Patients with a need for intravitreal drug administration: wet, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), or retinal venous occlusion * No previous intravitreal injections * Willingness and written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Not literate in German * Visual acuity of less than 6/60 in the worse eye * Severe hearing loss * Inability to use a touch screen device (e.g. severe tremor, etc.) * Pregnancy - for women in the reproductive age a pregnancy test is required

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of correctly answered questions between study group and control group12 monthsPatients are asked to complete a multiple choice questionnaire concerning intravitreal drug injections. Correctly answered questions will be summated. The more points the better the patients' knowledge about intravitreal drug injections.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Usability of the MacInfo tool12 monthsBy using an visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst usability) to 10 (best usability) patients will be asked about their impression concerning usability of the MacInfo tool

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactOliver Findl, MD
office@viros.at01 910201-57564
Backup ContactManuel Ruiss, MSc.
office@viros.at01 910201-57564

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026