Skip to content

Evaluation of the Safer Bars Prevention Program for Sexual Assault

Safer Bars: A Cluster-Randomized Effectiveness Evaluation of Alcohol-related Sexual Violence Prevention Through Bar Staff Bystander Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04141839
Enrollment
681
Registered
2019-10-28
Start date
2020-10-16
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sexual Assault Precursor Behavior

Brief summary

The goal is to evaluate at three sites the implementation of the Safer Bars sexual assault prevention program.

Detailed description

Sexual violence perpetration is robustly associated with social contexts that support high levels of alcohol consumption. Beginning in 2007, the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS) developed and field-tested the Safer Bars curriculum with support from the CDC Rape Prevention and Education (RPE) funding program. Safer Bars is a bystander prevention training for staff of alcohol serving establishments. This application proposes a theory-driven, quasi-experimental effectiveness evaluation based at The University of Arizona. Our approach is significant because few evaluations have measured behavioral outcomes as well as the mediators that explain the observed changes in bystander behavior, or community-level outcomes associated with such interventions. Specific Aims: the specific aims are to: (1) Test a hypothesized mediational model of individual-level behavioral outcomes based on the Theory of Planned Behavior; (2) assess the effect of the program on bar-level risk management safety policies; and (3) examine the community-level impact of the Safer Bars program on reducing the number of police dispatches in areas with high densities of alcohol-serving establishments. Methods: A cluster-randomized trial design with crossover to randomize participants at the bar level into intervention and delayed intervention arms is proposed. Assessments are at baseline, completion of training, and at three and six months post-training. The sample bars will be selected within a three-mile radius of the three major Arizona universities, all of which have a high density of alcohol-serving establishments adjacent to campus. Our analytical model will assess a hypothesized moderated mediational model based in the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Outcomes of interest include: (a) the extent to which Behavioral Intent, the central construct of TPB, mediates bar staff performance of intended bystander behaviors at three-month follow-up and the extent to which this relationship is moderated by personal characteristics and bar environment; (b) the effects of the program on bar-level risk management patron safety policies; and, (c) the community-level effects as demonstrated by number of police dispatches in areas with a high density of alcohol-serving establishments at baseline and at the end of the project using GIS data. With evidence of efficacy, Safer Bars is feasible for scale-up without excessive financial burden in other states, which all receive RPE funding.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSafer Bars

Safer Bars, a primary perpetration prevention program based on a bystander intervention model and the theory of planned behavior. Bar staff are trained to recognize and respond to sexual aggression and its precursors among patrons.

Sponsors

Arizona State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Arizona Department of Health Services
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Mary Koss
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants use code numbers to submit their data.

Intervention model description

A cluster-randomized trial design with crossover to randomize participants at the bar level into intervention and delayed intervention arms.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Both an employee and a liquor server, security official, or owner/manager of a bar randomly selected to receive Safer Bars training immediately or after an assessment only phase of 4 months and that has not participated in the Safe Bars training in the past 12 months. Accepts healthy volunteers as defined by holding active employment. Employees may opt out of training and/or assessment.

Exclusion criteria

* None. No liquor servers are allowed by law to be younger than 19 years old.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Did Not Offer Promotions Aimed at Attracting Female Patrons Post-interventionat baseline and up to 3 monthsSelf-reported survey items completed by bar owners/managers regarding promotions aimed at attracting female patrons
Number of Participants Who Reported Always Intervening Behavior at 6 Monthsat baseline and up to 6 monthsSelf-reported survey items measuring actual behavior (action taken) in response to observation of sexual aggression in the bar environment will be analyzed to identify significant differences post-intervention.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Staff
Delayed intervention: baseline and 3-month assessment prior to receiving the Safer Bars training. Safer Bars: Safer Bars, a primary perpetration prevention program based on a bystander intervention model and the theory of planned behavior. Bar staff are trained to recognize and respond to sexual aggression and its precursors among patrons.
310
Intervention Staff
This arm will consist of staff randomized to have the Safer Bars training on their premises attended by all their liquor serving staff with assessment directly before and after training (pre/post), and at 3 and 6 months post-training follow-up. Safer Bars: Safer Bars, a primary perpetration prevention program based on a bystander intervention model and the theory of planned behavior. Bar staff are trained to recognize and respond to sexual aggression and its precursors among patrons.
321
Control Managers
Delayed intervention: baseline and 3-month assessment prior to receiving the Safer Bars training. Safer Bars: Safer Bars, a primary perpetration prevention program based on a bystander intervention model and the theory of planned behavior. Bar managers are trained to recognize and change bar policies and environment to reduce sexual aggression and its precursors among patrons.
24
Intervention Managers
This arm with consist of managers randomized to have the Safer Bars training on their premises attended by all their liquor serving staff with assessment directly before and after training (pre/post), and at 3 months post-training follow-up. Safer Bars: Safer Bars, a primary perpetration prevention program based on a bystander intervention model and the theory of planned behavior. Bar managers are trained to recognize and change bar policies and environment to reduce sexual aggression and its precursors among patrons.
26
Total681

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl StaffIntervention StaffControl ManagersIntervention ManagersTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
310 Participants321 Participants24 Participants26 Participants681 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska Native
3 Participants15 Participants0 Participants0 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
6 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African-American
5 Participants18 Participants0 Participants1 Participants24 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
98 Participants106 Participants6 Participants8 Participants218 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern/North African
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
18 Participants17 Participants0 Participants0 Participants35 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
19 Participants15 Participants3 Participants0 Participants37 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
160 Participants144 Participants15 Participants16 Participants335 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender
Female
142 Participants126 Participants5 Participants13 Participants286 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender
Male
154 Participants179 Participants17 Participants13 Participants363 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender
Not reported
14 Participants16 Participants2 Participants0 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3350 / 346
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3350 / 346
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3350 / 346

Outcome results

Primary

Did Not Offer Promotions Aimed at Attracting Female Patrons Post-intervention

Self-reported survey items completed by bar owners/managers regarding promotions aimed at attracting female patrons

Time frame: at baseline and up to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control StaffDid Not Offer Promotions Aimed at Attracting Female Patrons Post-intervention13 Participants
Intervention StaffDid Not Offer Promotions Aimed at Attracting Female Patrons Post-intervention15 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Who Reported Always Intervening Behavior at 6 Months

Self-reported survey items measuring actual behavior (action taken) in response to observation of sexual aggression in the bar environment will be analyzed to identify significant differences post-intervention.

Time frame: at baseline and up to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control StaffNumber of Participants Who Reported Always Intervening Behavior at 6 Months207 Participants
Intervention StaffNumber of Participants Who Reported Always Intervening Behavior at 6 Months239 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026