Skip to content

Spinal Sufentanil for Obstetric Analgesia

Spinal Sufentanil for Relief of Labor Pain in Primi- and Multiparous Parturients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04141527
Enrollment
164
Registered
2019-10-28
Start date
2016-06-15
Completion date
2017-06-21
Last updated
2020-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor Pain

Keywords

Labor, Intrathecal sufentanil, Obstetrical, Spinal analgesia

Brief summary

Background: This descriptive study was designed to evaluate effects and adverse effects of spinal sufentanil for relief of labor pain in primi- and multiparous women. Methods: The retrospective study design was approved by the regional Human Research Ethics Review Board, Lund, Sweden (Dnr 2015/687). The investigators included 164 (82 primi- and 82 multiparous) obstetrical patients given 10 µg of intrathecal sufentanil for labor pain. Any maternal hypotension, third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, intrapartum Cesarean section, abnormal fetal heart rate, low Apgar score, use of neonatal intensive care, postdural puncture headache, epidural blood patch, and breastfeeding problem was recorded. Major outcome measures were maternal satisfaction with pain relief, and provision of supplementary analgesia.

Detailed description

A total sample size of 150 parturients had been calculated to enable differences of at least 20 % versus 5.0 % in proportions of obstetrical and neonatal problems between (equal numbers of) primi- and multiparous mothers to be statistically confirmed with 80 % power and 95 % probability. Descriptive parametric data is reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and descriptive non-parametric data as median with interquartile range (IQR). Proportions are reported in percent with 95 % confidence interval (CI). Parametric data was compared with two-tailed unpaired student's t-test, and non-parametric data with the Mann-Whitney U-test. Proportions were analyzed with two-tailed Fisher's exact test. Probability (P) values at \< 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Interventions

Spinal analgesia (SA) was provided by a resident or specialist anaesthesiologist with the patient in a sitting or a recumbent position. A pencil-point needle, primarily 27 G (0.4 mm), otherwise 25 G (0.5 mm), was used for transdermal intrathecal administration of 2.0 ml of sufentanil 5 µg/ml (Sufenta®, Janssen-Cilag AB, Solna, Sweden) at low-lumbar level. Blood pressure was recorded before, immediately after, and at five-minute intervals for 20 minutes after the block. Any decrease in systolic pressure to \<100 mmHg or a decrease \>20% from the baseline level despite infusion of crystalloid was defined to indicate maternal hypotension.

Sponsors

Lund University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Intrathecal sufentanil for labor pain

Exclusion criteria

Demographic, obstetrical or neonatal data is missing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epidural blood patch1 veek after spinal analgesiaUse of epidural blood patch
Maternal hypotensionDuring the first 20 minutes after spinal analgesia with 5 minutes intervalsAny fall in systolic pressure to \<100 mmHg or a decrease \>20% from the baseline level
Fetal bradycardiaDuring the first hour after spinal analgesiaA decrease in FHR(fetal heart rate) to 80 beats/ min for duration of 2 or more
Late fetal decelerationDuring the first hour after spinal analgesiaFHR(fetal heart rate)\<FHR 40 min beats/ min below the baseline or less than 90/beats min for duration of 2 minutes or more
Supplementary spinal analgesia24 hours after initial spinal analgesiaAny use of spinal analgesia after primary spinal analgesia
Supplementary epidural analgesia24 hours after initial spinal analgesiaAny use of epidural analgesia after primary spinal analgesia
Maternal satisfaction with pain relief24 hours after spinal analgesiaDefined by parturient after delivery as very god, god, less satisfactory or bad
Postspinal dural puncture headache48 hours after spinal analgesiaRate of postspinal dural puncture headache
Instrumental deliveryDuring childbirthUse of instrumental delivery
Intrapartum Cesarean sectionDuring childbirthUse of intrapartum Cesarean section
Third- or fourth-degree perineal tearDuring childbirthRate of third- or fourth-degree perineal tear
Oxytocin before spinal analgesia24 hours before childbirthAny use of oxytocin before spinal analgesia
Oxytocin after spinal analgesia24 hours after spinal analgesiaAny use of oxytocin after spinal analgesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Low Apgar score of newborn (Apgar score ≤ 7 )One minute and 5 minutes after birthNumber of newborns with Apgar score ≤ 7
Use of neonatal intensive care1 weekNumber of newborns requiring intensive care unit
Breastfeeding1 weekNumber of infants with breastfeeding
Time from maternal arrival until request for SADuring childbirthTime in minutes
Time from request for SA until arrival of anaesthesiologistDuring childbirthTime in minutes
Time from arrival of anaesthesiologist until SADuring childbirthTime in minutes
Time from SA until maximal cervical dilationDuring childbirthTime in minutes
Time from maximal cervical dilation until deliveryDuring childbirthTime in minutes

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026