Respiratory Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
Assessment of lung function requires the evaluation of pulmonary function by spirometry. However, some patients (e.g. children, elderly, or diseased individuals) may have difficulty performing the related forced maximal respiratory maneuver correctly. Forced oscillation technique (FOT) is increasingly being used in clinical settings to evaluate lung function noninvasively by measuring the mechanical input impedance of the respiratory system. FOT measures lung impedance during tidal breathing, requiring minimal patient cooperation. Recently a new methodology (within breath analysis) has emerged to evaluate changes that occur in the impedance during the breathing activity. The within-breath calculation of impedance allows separating the contribution of inspiration and expiration to the measured parameters. The purpose of this study is to establish reference ranges for within breath FOT parameters and their short term variability.
Detailed description
Purpose and rationale Assessment of lung function requires the evaluation of pulmonary function by spirometry. However, some patients (e.g. children, elderly, or diseased individuals) may have difficulty performing the related forced maximal respiratory maneuver correctly. Forced oscillation technique (FOT) is increasingly being used in clinical settings to evaluate lung function noninvasively by measuring the mechanical input impedance of the respiratory system. FOT measures lung impedance during tidal breathing, requiring minimal patient cooperation. Recently a new methodology (within breath analysis) has emerged to evaluate changes that occur in the impedance during the breathing activity. The within-breath calculation of impedance allows separating the contribution of inspiration and expiration to the measured parameters. The purpose of this study is to establish reference ranges for within breath FOT parameters and their short term variability. Objectives Primary: To derive equations to predict normal values and normality ranges for within-breath respiratory system resistance, reactance and related parameters at the selected stimulating waveform and to measure the short term variability of such parameters. Secondary: To demonstrate the equivalence of the results of a single multiple-breath test to results obtained as an average of 3 consecutive repeated tests. Study design This will be a prospective multi-center trial of healthy subjects. After signing the Informed Consent, an interview and physical examination will be performed. The examiner will confirm that subjects are able to perform acceptable and repeatable spirometry. FOT measurements will be performed, followed by standard spirometry measurements. Study Duration This is a single visit study. Subject participation will be completed in 1 hour and 15 min. Enrollment of all subjects is expected to take 23 weeks (6 months).
Interventions
Measurement of lung impedance by the Forced Oscillation Technique
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects ≥ 18 years of age. * Signature of the written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will be excluded if they meet at least one of the following conditions: * Abnormal spirometry defined as FEV1, FEV1/VC and VC below the LLN as established by the Global Lung function (GLI) 2012 reference equations. * Smokers or ex-smokers * BMI \>30 kg/cm2 * History of respiratory symptoms using the ECRHS II screening questionnaire (www.ecrhs.org) * Wheezing * Cough * Phlegm production * Dyspnea * Feeling of chest tightness * Night awakening due to a cough attack * Have a history of pulmonary or cardiac disease * Had a recent (e.g., in the last 4 weeks) respiratory tract infection * Have a neurological or neuromuscular disorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between respiratory impedance parameters and the following variables: age, height, weight, sex, abdominal circumference and phenotype, breathing pattern parameters. | 1 day | The equation resulting from the multivariate regression analysis between impedance parameters assessed during the test and anthropometric measurements of age, height, weight, sex, abdominal circumference and phenotype, breathing pattern parameters |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Noninferiority of one FOT test vs. the average of three consecutive tests | 1 day | Noninferiority hypothesis of the results of a single test with multiple breaths free from artifacts compared to those obtained in the same session as an average or 3 consecutive repeated tests |
Countries
Italy, United States