Evaluation of Smartphone Versions of VAS and NRS for Use in Adults

Postoperative Pain

postoperative pain, Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, Smartphone

A large number of patients experience significant pain after surgery, and more patients report pain after discharge from hospital than before. This issue has been observed in patients who receive peripheral nerve blocks, the effects of which often wear off after discharge. There are numerous barriers to the effective control of pain away from the direct supervision of medical professionals, and personalized management strategies are necessary in order to overcome these barriers. The first step of adequate pain management is accurate pain assessment. Therefore, this study aims to validate a smartphone-based pain assessment tool that patients can access at home.

1. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to establish whether the Panda versions of the 100mm VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and NRS-11 (Numeric Rating Scale) agree adequately with and can therefore be used in lieu of already validated paper versions of these scales for the evaluation of post-operative pain in adults. The Panda versions of the pain assessment scales have been condensed in size onto an iPod Touch screen but otherwise appear the same as traditional paper versions. 2. Hypothesis: There are no significant differences in the failure rates in obtaining pain scores and the pain scores obtained using Panda versions of the 100mm VAS and NRS-11 compared to the traditional paper versions. 3. Justification: The management of acute post-operative pain has a profound impact on a patient's short- and long-term wellbeing. Studies have shown that up to 70-80% of patients experience pain after surgery, with the majority reporting moderate, severe or extreme pain at some point. Ineffective pain management can increase the risk of venous thromboembolism, ischemic heart disease, pneumonia, poor wound healing , insomnia, anxiety and chronic post surgical pain (CPSP). The management of postoperative pain after patients leave hospital is especially inadequate, with more patients reporting pain after discharge than before. Although peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have demonstrated benefit in reducing immediate/in-hospital postoperative pain compared to general anesthesia (GA), this benefit is not sustained after patients are discharged. In fact, more patients who received PNB report their pain as severe, excruciating or extreme and seek medical attention after leaving hospital, than those who were under GA. The nociceptive barrage after the signal blockade by regional anesthesia wears off can theoretically lead to hyperalgesia, and the substantial increase in acute pain over a period of hours can be highly traumatic for patients. In order to minimize this effect, patients are often advised to begin the titration of their oral analgesics prior to the resolution of their nerve blocks, often when they do not feel much pain yet. Potential barriers encountered during this process can include the lack of incentive to begin analgesics in the presence of residual nociceptive blockade, the difficulty of titrating medications away from the direct supervision of medical professionals, and the fear of medication overdose. Therefore, detailed, easily comprehensible and patient specific pain management instructions need to be provided as a part of the discharge plan in order to facilitate patient compliance. The first step involves developing a practical tool that allows for the accurate and reliable assessment and recording of pain severity that patients can use from home. Pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage. It is a highly individual experience. Therefore, self-report is considered the gold standard for pain assessment, with the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) being the three most validated self-report scales in adults. The VAS-100mm is a 100mm line with the anchoring words no pain and worst imaginable pain at the bottom and top, respectively. The NRS-11 is a line marked with numbers from 0 to 10 at even intervals, with the anchoring words no pain and worst pain imaginable at 0 and 10, respectively. Digital versions of pain scales that can be downloaded onto a smartphone have been found to be comparable to traditional paper versions in terms of their ability to measure pain. In addition to being portable and accessible, the digitization of pain assessments have the potential to reduce human errors that could occur during scoring and data recording. Furthermore, there is growing evidence that smartphone applications (apps) have the potential to improve compliance with disease and medication management by motivating patients to be involved in their own care. These properties make them promising tools for the management of postsurgical pain at home. The smartphone application Panda (Pain Assessment using a Novel Digital Application) developed by the British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH) Pediatric Anesthesia Research Team (PART), includes digital versions of the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) and Color Analog Scale (CAS), and has been validated in the pediatric population. Because the 100mm VAS and the 11-point NRS have been studied specifically in adults as tools for the evaluation of postoperative pain, the app will be modified to include these two scales to better suit this population. 4. Objectives: Panda will be compared against the traditional versions for both the NRS-11 and 100mm VAS to analyse the following endpoints: * Agreement between the two measures - the Panda score and the traditional score. * Practicality: difference in failure rates in obtaining pain scores from Panda compared with the traditional methods 5. Research design: This is an observational, randomized, cross-over controlled, open trial. 6. Statistical analysis: * Practicality: Chi-squared tests will be used to assess the difference in failure rates in obtaining pain scores from Panda compared with the traditional methods * Agreement: an interval approach described by Bland & Altman will be used to calculate the agreement between the the Panda scores and the 'traditional' scores. Sample size: There will be 2 study groups- the 100mm VAS and NRS-11 groups. Each group will contain 2 subgroups - ages \>18 to \< 60 years and ≥60 to ≤ 75 years. The required sample of 32 patients per subgroup has been calculated on the basis of Liao's proposed sample size calculation for an agreement study based on the Bland-Altman interval method, setting the discordance rate (α) = 0.05 and the tolerance probability (β) = 80%. 160 patients will be recruited to allow for any unplanned gaps in data collection, patients withdrawing from the study and other exclusions

No related papers found yet.

Canada