Healthy
Conditions
Keywords
Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Lower Extremity
Brief summary
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured knee ligament during performance of recreational activities and sports. In the United States, the annual incidence is 68.6 per 100,000 people per year and in Brazil, the estimation of ACL reconstruction increases 64%. There are different biomechanical profiles of risk factors for an ACL injury variable, the ligament dominance, the quadriceps dominance, the trunk dominance, and the leg dominance. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the biomechanics adaptations after power and strength combined training protocol in healthy individuals. A second aim is to determine the effect of the training on knee injury risk factors.
Detailed description
This is a parallel randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of combined training with power and strength exercises on lower extremity biomechanics in healthy individuals. The sample size was calculated with G\*Power software using the ANOVA: Repeated measures, within-between interaction, 90% power, alpha 0.05, and 30% drop-out. Data from the tuck jump test (knee flexion range) by Makaruk (2014) were considered for this calculation with effect size 0.46. Thus, a total of 32 individuals (16 per group) is required for this study. To ensure the proper simple size, after collecting the first five participants per group, the sample size will be checked again. The participants will be randomized in experimental and no intervention groups inside each risk profile group. Randomization ratio will be 1:1 and interventions will last 10 weeks, with two weekly sessions for the exercise arms. The outcomes will include functional clinical tests, kinematic and kinetic variables during landing tasks, and strength of knee and hip muscles. The data analysis will be performed by intention to treat and per protocol. Generalized estimating equations will be used to identify interaction effects of groups and time followed by Bonferroni post-hoc. When effect are found, effect size will be estimated. Missing data will be estimate by statistical analysis.
Interventions
OTHERCombined training with power and strength exercises
The training will be compose by power and strength exercises and divided in two days. One day with the exercises: vertical jumps, box jumps, sit-ups, back-extension and guided squat. The second with half squat jumps, high straight jumps, bounding jumps, drop jumps and sprint. Both days will be started with warm up on treadmill running lasting 5 minutes at 6.5-7.5 km/h. The training protocol includes 20 sessions with 2 sessions per week during 10 weeks (2 weeks to adaptation and others 8 to training with progression of load after 4 weeks).
Sponsors
Universidade Federal do Pampa
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
Statistical analyzer will be masking.
Intervention model description
Two groups design where one randomized group receive treatment and the other not in the same period of time.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Male sex; * Age between 18 and 30 years old; * Who practice physical activity (except: strength and jump training) between 80 and 150 minute per week; * No previous muscle lower extremity injury at least 6 months prior to recruitment; * No previous ligament and tendon lower extremity injury or surgery; * No auditory, vestibular, visual or musculoskeletal injuries or disease that impairment the execution of assessments or training protocol; * No hypertension, cardiovascular or respiratory disease.
Exclusion criteria
* Body mass index greater than 35 kg/m².
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline value of muscle maximal isometric strength for knee extensors and flexors, and hip aductors and abductors from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Value of maximal isometric strength |
| Change from baseline peak sagittal plane angle of ankle, knee and hip from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Peak angle of sagittal plane during landing task |
| Change from baseline value of sagittal plane angles for ankle, knee, hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task |
| Change from baseline value of frontal plane angles for ankle, knee, hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task |
| Change from baseline value of transverse plane angles for hip, pelvis from both legs, and trunk | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task |
| Change from baseline peak frontal plane angle of knee and hip from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Peak angle of frontal plane during landing task |
| Change from baseline range of knee frontal plane angle from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Range of frontal plane angle between initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task |
| Change from baseline range of knee sagittal plane angle from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Range of sagittal plane angle between initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task |
| Change from baseline value of sagittal plane joint moment knee and hip from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task |
| Change from baseline value of frontal plane joint moment knee and hip from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Value at initial contact instant and maximal knee flexion instant of landing task |
| Change from baseline peak of knee frontal plane joint moment from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Peak of joint moment during landing task |
| Change from baseline value of ground reaction force vertical component from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Value at maximal knee flexion instant of landing task |
| Change from baseline value of loading rate from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Value calculated by relation between peak of ground reaction force vertical component and time to peak from initial contact during landing task |
| Change from baseline peak of ground reaction force vertical component from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Peak of ground reaction force during landing task |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline asymmetry index of functional physical performance between legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Assessed according the maximal distance obtained during hop tests performance (single, triple and crossover). The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs. |
| Change from baseline asymmetry index of quality of dynamic movement between legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Quality of movement is assessed according the escore obtained during Lateral Step Down test performance. The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs. |
| Change from baseline functional physical performance of lower extremities from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Assessed according the maximal distance obtained during hop tests performance (single, triple and crossover) |
| Change from baseline pennation angle of muscle fibers of knee extensors and flexors from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | The angle between the longitudinal axis of the entire muscle and its fibers. |
| Change from baseline muscle fascicle length of knee extensors and flexors from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | The distance between the intersection composed of the superficial aponeurosis and fascicle and the intersection composed of the deep aponeurosis and the fascicle |
| Change from baseline muscle thickness of knee extensors and flexors from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Estimation of muscle cross-sectional area |
| Change from baseline power value of ankle, knee and hip joints from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Relation of work and velocity during landing task |
| Change from baseline dynamic strength of lower extremities muscles | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | The force developed to perform one maximal repetition to perform leg press and squat tasks |
| Change from baseline maximal dorsiflexion amplitude of ankle joint from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Maximal dorsiflexion amplitude obtained during lunge test |
| Change from baseline dynamic balance of lower extremities from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Dynamic balance is assessed according the displacement obtained during Star Excursion Balance Test |
| Change from baseline dynamic balance index of asymmetry between legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Dynamic balance is assessed according the displacement obtained during Star Excursion Balance Test. The asymmetry index is calculated by relation between preferred and non preferred legs. |
| Change from baseline quality of dynamic movement of lower extremities from both legs | Baseline and up to 10 weeks | Quality of movement is assessed according the escore obtained during Lateral Step Down test performance |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Muscle Soreness after each training session | 24 and 48 hours after each training session throughout 10 weeks | Value from visual analog scale (score between 0 to 10 points) representative to discomfort or pain after training sessions. Higher values represent worst discomfor/pain |
| Training load of each training session | At the end of each training session throughout 10 weeks | Product between rate of perceived exertion and session duration training |
Countries
Brazil
Outcome results
None listed