Skip to content

Timolol Gel for Epistaxis in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia

Efficacy of a Timolol Gel in the Care for Epistaxis in Patients With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04139018
Acronym
ETIC-HHT
Enrollment
27
Registered
2019-10-25
Start date
2019-10-20
Completion date
2020-05-20
Last updated
2021-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia

Keywords

Epistaxis

Brief summary

This study is a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of an intranasal topical timolol gel in the care for epistaxis in adults with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Detailed description

This study is a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 8-week randomized clinical trial investigating the efficacy of timolol gel in the management of epistaxis in adults with HHT. The Specific Aims are to determine in adults with HHT-associated epistaxis: 1. If topical timolol gel is more effective than placebo in reducing the frequency and severity of epistaxis. 2. If topical timolol gel is more effective than placebo in improving hemoglobin levels. 3. The frequency of adverse events, side effects, and safety profile of topical timolol gel delivered to the nasal mucosa.

Interventions

DRUGTimolol Gel

Timolol nasal gel 0.1% will be prepared with a poloxamer gel (combination of poloxamer 188 and 407; pH adjusted to 4.5-6.5) and 0.5 ml applied to each nostril twice daily. The total daily dose would amount to 2 mg.

DRUGPlacebo Gel

Placebo gel is prepared with poloxamers and no active ingredients.

Sponsors

Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults ages 20 and older 2. Confirmed clinical (meeting at least 3 of the 4 Curaçao Criteria) or genetic diagnosis of HHT 3. Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) ≥ 4 and 2 or more nosebleeds per week with a cumulative nosebleed duration of at least 5 minutes per week 4. Stable nasal hygiene and medical regimen for preceding 1 month 5. Stable epistaxis pattern over the preceding 3 months

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindications for systemic β adrenergic blocker administration 1. Hypersensitivity to β adrenergic blockers 2. Asthma or bronchospasm 3. Congestive heart failure with LVEF \<40% 4. Hereditary pulmonary arterial hypertension 5. Baseline bradycardia (HR \<55 beats per minute) 6. Sick Sinus Syndrome 7. 2nd or 3rd degree heart block, left or right bundle branch block, or bifasicular block 8. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (most recent HbA1c \>9%) or diabetic ketoacidosis within last 6 months 9. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 90) 2. Known hypersensitivity to timolol 3. Severe peripheral circulatory disturbances (Raynaud phenomenon) 4. Known intermediate or poor metabolizer variant of the liver enzyme CYP2D6 5. Current use of any of the following known strong CYP2D6 inhibitors: fluoxetine (Prozac), paroxetine (Paxil), bupropion (Welbutrin), quinidine, quinine, ritonavir (Norvir), and terbinafine (Lamisil) 6. Current use of the following other drugs known to pharmacodynamically interact with timolol: diltiazem, verapamil, digoxin, digitalis, propafenone, disopyramide, clonidine, flecainide, or lidocaine 7. Patients currently treated or who plan to initiate treatment with β-blockers 8. Use of any anti-angiogenic medication in the last month prior to recruitment, including bevacizumab, pazopanib, thalidomide, or lenalidomide 9. Illicit drug use, except marijuana 10. Known pheochromocytoma 11. Use of anticoagulants, antiplatelet, or fibrinolytic therapies within the last month prior to recruitment, except for low-dose (81 mg or less) of aspirin 12. Pregnancy or planned pregnancy in the next 6 months or currently breastfeeding 13. Inability to read or understand English 14. Inability to complete 8 weeks of therapy for any reason

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Assisted Epistaxis Severity Scale (aESS) Score From Baseline at 8 Week Follow-upBaseline to 8-week follow-upAssessment of epistaxis severity will be obtained by the validated instrument, the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS). To complete the ESS, patients are asked to consider typical symptoms over the previous 3 months. The ESS contains 6 items - frequency, duration, and intensity of nosebleeds, whether patient has sought medication attention, whether patient is anemic, and whether patient has received a blood transfusion. The overall score ranges from 0 to 10, with severity of nosebleed based on score graded as None composite score of 0-1, Mild 1-4, Moderate 4-7, and Severe as 7-10.The minimal important difference noticeable by both patients and clinicians in the ESS scoring system is estimated as a change of 0.71. The scoring and MCID of the aESS is the same as the ESS. The aESS references a participant's epistaxis over the past 1 month, and the change in aESS was calculated as the aESS score at 8 weeks minus the aESS score at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Improved Response on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleScores at 8-week follow-up onlyCGI-I is a global rating of improvement scale, which requires subjects to rate their degree of improvement on a seven-point scale: Compared to your condition at admission to the project \[prior to medication initiation\], how would you rate your overall response: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred from October 2019 through March 2020 at Washington University HHT Center of Excellence

Pre-assignment details

272 participants total were assessed for eligibility; 245 met exclusion criteria

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Timolol Gel Arm
Participants in the timolol gel arm (active medication arm) will receive timolol nasal gel 0.1% with 0.5 mL applied to each nostril twice daily via a syringe that will amount to a 2 mg total daily dose. Timolol Gel: Timolol nasal gel 0.1% will be prepared with a poloxamer gel (combination of poloxamer 188 and 407; pH adjusted to 4.5-6.5) and 0.5 ml applied to each nostril twice daily. The total daily dose would amount to 2 mg.
14
Placebo Gel Arm
Participants in the placebo gel arm will receive the gel itself with no active medication. Placebo Gel: Placebo gel is prepared with poloxamers and no active ingredients.
13
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyScreen fail10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo Gel ArmTotalTimolol Gel Arm
Age, Continuous52 years55 years58 years
Baseline Clinical Global Impression - Severity
Mild Problem
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Baseline Clinical Global Impression - Severity
Moderate/Severe Problem
5 Participants15 Participants10 Participants
Baseline Clinical Global Impression - Severity
No Problem
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baseline Clinical Global Impression - Severity
Problem as bad as it could be
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baseline Clinical Global Impression - Severity
Unknown
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Comorbidity Status
Mild
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Comorbidity Status
Moderate
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Comorbidity Status
None
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Comorbidity Status
Severe
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Hypertension2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants25 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants27 participants14 participants
Seasonal Allergies9 Participants18 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants14 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants13 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 143 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Assisted Epistaxis Severity Scale (aESS) Score From Baseline at 8 Week Follow-up

Assessment of epistaxis severity will be obtained by the validated instrument, the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS). To complete the ESS, patients are asked to consider typical symptoms over the previous 3 months. The ESS contains 6 items - frequency, duration, and intensity of nosebleeds, whether patient has sought medication attention, whether patient is anemic, and whether patient has received a blood transfusion. The overall score ranges from 0 to 10, with severity of nosebleed based on score graded as None composite score of 0-1, Mild 1-4, Moderate 4-7, and Severe as 7-10.The minimal important difference noticeable by both patients and clinicians in the ESS scoring system is estimated as a change of 0.71. The scoring and MCID of the aESS is the same as the ESS. The aESS references a participant's epistaxis over the past 1 month, and the change in aESS was calculated as the aESS score at 8 weeks minus the aESS score at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to 8-week follow-up

Population: Analysis was used with intention-to-treat principles, so all patients enrolled with baseline data were included. Note: the screen fail participant within the timolol gel arm had no baseline data say they were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Timolol Gel ArmChange in Assisted Epistaxis Severity Scale (aESS) Score From Baseline at 8 Week Follow-up2.32 units on a scale
Placebo Gel ArmChange in Assisted Epistaxis Severity Scale (aESS) Score From Baseline at 8 Week Follow-up1.96 units on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improved Response on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

CGI-I is a global rating of improvement scale, which requires subjects to rate their degree of improvement on a seven-point scale: Compared to your condition at admission to the project \[prior to medication initiation\], how would you rate your overall response: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment.

Time frame: Scores at 8-week follow-up only

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Timolol Gel ArmNumber of Participants With Improved Response on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleNo Change0 Participants
Timolol Gel ArmNumber of Participants With Improved Response on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleSlightly Improved4 Participants
Timolol Gel ArmNumber of Participants With Improved Response on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleMuch Improved7 Participants
Placebo Gel ArmNumber of Participants With Improved Response on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleNo Change1 Participants
Placebo Gel ArmNumber of Participants With Improved Response on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleSlightly Improved3 Participants
Placebo Gel ArmNumber of Participants With Improved Response on Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ScaleMuch Improved8 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026