Skip to content

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer (HCHTOG1903)

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial (HCHTOG1903)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04138212
Acronym
HCHTOG1903
Enrollment
456
Registered
2019-10-24
Start date
2019-10-22
Completion date
2028-12-21
Last updated
2022-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, randomized controlled, survival

Brief summary

Multimodal treatment combining surgery with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy is necessary to improve the chances of survival in patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer. However, there is no consensus about the neoadjuvant treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of current randomized controlled clinical trail is to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy plus surgery on overall survival for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The investigators plan to enroll 456 patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in 3 years. Eligible patients will be randomized into neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (paclitaxel 175mg/m2 plus cisplatin 75mg/m2, q21d, 2 cycles) or neoadjuvant chemoradiation group (41.4Gy, 1.8Gy\*23d plus paclitaxel 50mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC=2, q1w, 5 cycles). The primary endpoint is 5 year overall survival and the secondary endpoints include 5 year disease-free survival, adverse events, pathologic complete response, postoperative complications, quality of life. The biomarkers predicting the sensitivity of neoadjuvant therapy will be explored.

Interventions

Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 plus Cisplatin 75mg/m2, q21d, 2 cycles

Paclitaxel 50mg/m2 plus Carboplatin AUC=2, q1w, 5 cycles; 41.4Gy, 1.8Gy/d\*23

Sponsors

Henan Cancer Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* cT2-T4aN+M0 or cT3-4aN0M0 (8th TNM staging system) thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma * No metastatic cervical lymph node * No anti-cancer treatment * No contraindication for esophagectomy * No contraindication for chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy * PS score 0-1 * Written consent is obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Previous cancer treatment history * Concurrent cancer disease in other site * Tumor length ≥8cm * Tumor width ≥5cm * Need continuous steroid treatment * Cardiac infarction in 6 months * Psychotic patient * Can not achieve R0 resection * Gastric tube can not be used for reconstruction after esophagectomy * Pregnant woman

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
overall survival5 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
disease-free survival5 year
pathological complete response3 months
adverse events3 months
postoperative complications3 months

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactHaibo Sun
sunny-haipo@hotmail.com+8615188301091

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026