Skip to content

Melatonin Effect in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Clinical Response in Locally Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Effect of Melatonin in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to HIF-1⍺, CD44, CD133, and miR-210 Expression and Clinical Response in Locally Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04137627
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-10-24
Start date
2017-07-04
Completion date
2018-12-18
Last updated
2019-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

Melatonin, Locally Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Brief summary

Backgrounds Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cancer (OSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for oral cancers. In locally advanced and unresectable oral cancer, surgery presents challenges primarily because the head and neck region have many critical structures that can be damaged by tumor or treatment. Damage to the critical structures can result in significant structural, cosmetic and functional deficits that negatively impact quality of life. Use of NC was found to achieve resectability in 39% of locally advanced unresectable oral cancers. Patil et al. reported response rate with the three drugs regimen (TPF) for NC was 32% and 27,37% for two drugs regimen (TP). The overall response rate in the TPF group was significantly higher than that in the PF group, both in the induction-chemotherapy phase and after locoregional therapy (33,3% vs 19,9%, p = 0,004). Chemoresistancy has become the challenge in OSCC treatment affecting tumor response to chemotherapy. Hypoxic microenvironment found in OSCC is marked by the high expression of HIF-1α. CD44 and CD133 as a cancer stem cells marker in head and neck (HNSCC) and miR-210 known as hypoxamiR has been reported to contribute chemoresistancy. As hypoxia inarguably one of the main causes of chemoresistancy, it is agreeable to use melatonin as an antioxidant to reduce the hypoxic condition in tumor microenvironment. Melatonin, a potent endogenous antioxidant agent is proven to have an oncostatic effect, was given in expect to reduce the tumor hypoxic condition so that it would increase the tumor response on NC. Majority of the clinical study use oral melatonin given once daily in 20 mg dose as the minimal dose to yield anti-tumor effects. The purpose of this study is to prove the effectiveness of melatonin to increase clinical response in locally advanced OSCC patients when treated with NC. The effect of melatonin in reducing tumor hypoxia will be seen through its effect in decreasing the gene expressions of HIF-1α, miR-210, CD44, and CD133. Methods Study Design This study is a double blind, randomized clinical trial using placebo as comparison running from June 2017 to July 2018 . Locally advanced OSSC (stage IVA and IVB) patients that will receive NC were included in the study. Fifty patients treated at two centres (RSCM and RSKD) were randomly allocated into two arms. Twenty-five patients received melatonin combined with three regiment NC (Taxane, Cisplatin, and 5-FU) and the other received placebo with NC. However only 25 out of 50 patients had completed the study protocol (13 patients in melatonin arm and 12 in placebo arm) Evaluation of Clinical Response The clinical response were assessed by evaluating pre-treatment and post treatment MRI with the aid of RECIST 1.1. First, it is necessary to estimate the overall tumor burden at baseline (target and non-target lesion) and use this as a comparator for subsequent measurement. The tumor response then being determined according to the definition criteria according to RECIST 1.1, as follows: Complete response (CR) is the disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response (PR) means there is at least 30% decrement in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive disease (PD) means there is at least a 20% increment in the sum of diameters of target lesions or an absolute increment of at least 5 mm. Stable disease (SD) is when there is neither a sufficient shrinkage nor sufficient increment of target lesion. Patients who categorized as PR and CR undergone surgery while those with SD and PD undergone core biopsy. Genes expression examination The primer for HIF-1α miR210, CD44, and CD133 genes amplification was design using a Primer Quest Tool IDT software. The total sequence of each gene attained from GenBank data source: National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The steps of gene expression examination are RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and absolute quantification qPCR. qPCR result was analyzed based on the gene expression concentration compare to the pre-determined standard curve (positive control) of each genes. Statistical analysis The data was analysed with statistics software SPSS 20. Saphiro Wilk was used to test data normal distribution. Data with normal distribution and with p \> 0,05 presented in mean +- standard deviation (SD). Data with abnormal data distribution presented in median (minimal and maximal value). The statistical difference of gene concentration level (numerical data) between melatonin and placebo was analysed using normality test of Saphiro Wilk. Data with normal distribution was tested using unpaired-T test, while data with abnormal distribution was tested using Mann Whitney. Statistically significant different stated as p \< 0,05.

Interventions

The administration of Melatonin 20 mg in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy to observe the antioxidant and onco-static effect.

DRUGPlacebo oral capsule

The administration of placebo capsule in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Sponsors

Indonesia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double-blind masking

Intervention model description

one group receive standard treatment with melatonin, while the other group receive standard treatment with placebo

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma 2. Patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma who are planned with neoadjuvant chemotherapy 3. Patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma who are planned with neoadjuvant chemotherapy who have not received any definitive treatment modalities, including surgical resection and chemoradiation therapy before the study conducted 4. Patients who are willing to sign the informed consent form to be our subject participants 5. Karnofky \>50

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who are already treated with definitive therapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma 2. Patients who are not eligible to be treated with chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Response as Measured by RECIST 1.1. Criteria1 YearClinical Response is measured using RECIST 1.1. criteria. CR (Complete response) is defined as disappearance of all target lesion, and pathological lymph node showing reduction of its shortest axis to less than 10 mm. PR (Partial response) is defined as reduction of total target lesion diameter at least by 30%. PD (Progressive disease) is defined as total target lesion diameter increased in size atleast by 20% or 5 mm OR occurence of one new lesion. SD (Stable disease) is defined as absence of reduction or increasing of target lesion. Patients with PR and CR are considered as positive response. Patients with SD and PD are considered as negative response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Expression of HIF-1⍺ as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification1 YearExpression of HIF-1⍺ is measured at the initial period of the study (baseline) and after 3 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles are completed using qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification. Change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.
Change in Expression of miR-210 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification1 YearExpression of miR-210 is measured at the initial period of the study (baseline) and after 3 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles are completed using qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification. Change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.
Change in Expression of CD44 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification1 YearExpression of CD44 is measured at the initial period of the study (baseline) and after 3 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles are completed using qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification. Change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.
Change in Expression of CD133 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification1 YearExpression of CD133 is measured at the initial period of the study (baseline) and after 3 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles are completed using qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification. Change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.

Countries

Indonesia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Melatonin Group
Participants who received Melatonin (treatment arm) who finished study protocol
13
Placebo Group
Participants who received Placebo (control arm) who finished study protocol
12
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMelatonin GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Age, Customized
Greater than 50 years
8 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Age, Customized
Less than or equal to 50 years
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Differentiation
Moderately Differentiated
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Differentiation
Poorly Differentiated
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Differentiation
Well Differentiated
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Grade
High Grade
6 Participants11 Participants17 Participants
Grade
Low Grade
7 Participants1 Participants8 Participants
Keratinized/non-keratinized
Keratinized
12 Participants6 Participants18 Participants
Keratinized/non-keratinized
Non-keratinized
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Medication adherence
Poor adherence
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Medication adherence
Strict adherence
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Indonesia
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Stage
Stage IV A
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants
Stage
Stage IV B
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Tumor Location
Buccal
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Tumor Location
Gingiva (Gum)
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Tumor Location
Mandible
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Tumor Location
Palate
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Tumor Location
Tongue
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 1312 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Response as Measured by RECIST 1.1. Criteria

Clinical Response is measured using RECIST 1.1. criteria. CR (Complete response) is defined as disappearance of all target lesion, and pathological lymph node showing reduction of its shortest axis to less than 10 mm. PR (Partial response) is defined as reduction of total target lesion diameter at least by 30%. PD (Progressive disease) is defined as total target lesion diameter increased in size atleast by 20% or 5 mm OR occurence of one new lesion. SD (Stable disease) is defined as absence of reduction or increasing of target lesion. Patients with PR and CR are considered as positive response. Patients with SD and PD are considered as negative response.

Time frame: 1 Year

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MelatoninClinical Response as Measured by RECIST 1.1. CriteriaPositive Response5 Participants
MelatoninClinical Response as Measured by RECIST 1.1. CriteriaNegative Response8 Participants
PlaceboClinical Response as Measured by RECIST 1.1. CriteriaPositive Response5 Participants
PlaceboClinical Response as Measured by RECIST 1.1. CriteriaNegative Response7 Participants
Secondary

Change in Expression of CD133 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification

Expression of CD133 is measured at the initial period of the study (baseline) and after 3 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles are completed using qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification. Change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.

Time frame: 1 Year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MelatoninChange in Expression of CD133 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPre-Treatment1.13 Picogram/microliter
MelatoninChange in Expression of CD133 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPost-Treatment1.42 Picogram/microliter
MelatoninChange in Expression of CD133 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationChange (Posttreatment - Pretreatment)0.43 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of CD133 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPre-Treatment1.07 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of CD133 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPost-Treatment1.88 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of CD133 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationChange (Posttreatment - Pretreatment)0.55 Picogram/microliter
Secondary

Change in Expression of CD44 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification

Expression of CD44 is measured at the initial period of the study (baseline) and after 3 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles are completed using qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification. Change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.

Time frame: 1 Year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MelatoninChange in Expression of CD44 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPre-Treatment0.0349 Picogram/microliter
MelatoninChange in Expression of CD44 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPost-Treatment0.0115 Picogram/microliter
MelatoninChange in Expression of CD44 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationChange (Posttreatment - Pretreatment)-0.0114 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of CD44 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPre-Treatment0.0095 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of CD44 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPost-Treatment0.0187 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of CD44 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationChange (Posttreatment - Pretreatment)0.0082 Picogram/microliter
Secondary

Change in Expression of HIF-1⍺ as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification

Expression of HIF-1⍺ is measured at the initial period of the study (baseline) and after 3 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles are completed using qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification. Change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.

Time frame: 1 Year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MelatoninChange in Expression of HIF-1⍺ as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPre-Treatment0.018 Picogram/microliter
MelatoninChange in Expression of HIF-1⍺ as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPost-Treatment0.012 Picogram/microliter
MelatoninChange in Expression of HIF-1⍺ as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationChange (Posttreatment - Pretreatment)-0.008 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of HIF-1⍺ as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPre-Treatment0.0048 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of HIF-1⍺ as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPost-Treatment0.0087 Picogram/microliter
PlaceboChange in Expression of HIF-1⍺ as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationChange (Posttreatment - Pretreatment)0.0027 Picogram/microliter
Secondary

Change in Expression of miR-210 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification

Expression of miR-210 is measured at the initial period of the study (baseline) and after 3 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles are completed using qRT-PCR Absolute Quantification. Change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the earlier time point.

Time frame: 1 Year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MelatoninChange in Expression of miR-210 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPre-Treatment162.8 Picogram/microliterStandard Deviation 54.92
MelatoninChange in Expression of miR-210 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPost-Treatment53.8 Picogram/microliterStandard Deviation 16.65
MelatoninChange in Expression of miR-210 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationChange (Posttreatment - Pretreatment)-109.09 Picogram/microliterStandard Deviation 51.62
PlaceboChange in Expression of miR-210 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPre-Treatment175.2 Picogram/microliterStandard Deviation 34.3
PlaceboChange in Expression of miR-210 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationPost-Treatment53.5 Picogram/microliterStandard Deviation 14.28
PlaceboChange in Expression of miR-210 as Measured by qRT-PCR Absolute QuantificationChange (Posttreatment - Pretreatment)-103.71 Picogram/microliterStandard Deviation 36.24

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026