Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Subacute and Chronic Atopic Dermatitis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Phase Ⅱ Clinical Trial and Open Label Long-term Observation Study of ADSTEM Inj. to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Subacute and Chronic Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04137562
Enrollment
118
Registered
2019-10-24
Start date
2019-12-11
Completion date
2027-10-31
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

Adipose Derived Mesenchymal Stem cell, ADMSC, AD, Inflammatory disease, ADMC, Stem cell, ehlbio

Brief summary

A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Phase Ⅱ Clinical Trial and Open Label Long-term Observation Study of ADSTEM Inj. to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Subacute and Chronic Atopic Dermatitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ADSTEM Inj. against Placebo in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in patients with moderate to severe acute and chronic atopic.

Detailed description

This clinical trial is designed with multi-organization, random assignment, single-blind, second-phase clinical trials and open long-term follow up studies, and is intended for patients with secondary or above subacuteal and chronic atopic dermatitis. If the test subjects voluntarily agree in writing to participate in this clinical trial, they shall conduct the examination and examination required for four weeks prior to administration of the investigational product (visit 1) in accordance with the clinical trial plan. As a result of the suitability assessment of the test subjects, those who comply with the inclusion/exclusion criteria, adipose tissue will be collected through the liposuction method and randomly assigned to each arms. Subjects who are eligible for administration of the investigational product on the day of administration (visit 2) under the investigator's judgment are given intravenous administration of the clinical trial medication once at the date of administration (visit 2, visit 3) and follow-up inspection is conducted at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks after the first administration of the investigational product and safety and efficacy assessments are conducted for a total of 16 weeks. The test subjects assigned to the placebo group shall be compensated by administering a experimental drug on demand after the visit 6. It is a principle to administer the test drug prepared from the previously obtained adipose tissue, and it is possible to carry out further adipose tissue collection if necessary. However, no safety and efficacy assessments of compensatory treatments will be collected. Safety and efficacy will be analyzed after all the subjects has completed visit 6. For the experimental group only, long-term observation study for safety assessment is conducted at the point of 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months after the second administration of the investigational product for a total of 5 years.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALADSTEM Inj.

Two 5mL of the following study drug is pre-mixed with 320mL of 0.9% normal saline is injected intravenously twice for the duration of the study. Treatment group: ADSTEM Inj. 0.5x10\^8 cells/5mL

OTHERPlacebo

330mL of 0.9% normal saline is injected intravenously twice for the duration of the study.

Sponsors

EHL Bio Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants and efficacy outcome assessor will be blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At the time of visit 1, only men and women aged between 19 and 70 * Patients with atopic dermatitis meeting the Hanifin and Rajka diagnostic criteria * Subacute and chronic patients with symptoms of atopic dermatitis lasting at least 6 months * Patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who meet all of the following criteria 1. SCORAD score ≥ 20points 2. EASI score ≥ 12points 3. BSA ≥ 10% * Patients with inadequate response to the stable use of topical atopic dermatitis treatment within 24 weeks prior to study initiation, or those who are unable to administer topical atopic dermatitis treatment due to safety reasons * Patients who voluntarily agreed in writing to participate in this clinical trial

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with systemic infection symptoms at the time of clinical trials * Patients with HIV, HBV, HCV, Syphilis test positive * Patients with uncontrolled asthma disease at the time of clinical trial participation * Patients who were considered inevitable to receive the medication from 1 month prior to administration of the clinical trial drug to visit 6 such as Immune function modifier(tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, cyclosporine, etc.), and high-frequency topical steroids in Groups 1 to 5, systemic steroids, systemic photochemotherapy, medication that are thought to affect other immune functions (such as immunoglobulin therapy like dupilumab, tralloquinap and desensitization therapy, etc.) * Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or have a pregnancy plan up to visit 6 or who do not use available contraceptive methods (women of childbearing age must be negative in screening pregnancy test) * If patients are the male subject, Those who do not agree to have a contraception during the clinical trial (If the male subject or female partner is infertile, the above-mentioned contravention method is unnecessary) * Patients participating in other clinical trials or participating in other clinical trials within the last 30 days * Patients who have experienced significant adverse events during treatment with stem cell therapies * Patients with stem cell therapy doses or history of participating in clinical trials * Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to antibiotics and antifungal agents used in the manufacture of medicines for clinical trials * Patients with renal dysfunction whose creatinine level is more than twice the normal upper limit in the screening test * Patients with hepatic dysfunction whose AST (Aspartate Amino Transaminase) and ALT (Alanine Amino Transaminase) levels are more than three times the normal upper limit * Patients who are not suitable for this clinical trial under the judgment of the other examiners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EASI-5016 weeksPercentage of subjects whose EASI score decreased by 50% or more at 16 weeks compared to baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EASI-504, 8, 12 weeksPercentage of subjects whose EASI score decreased by 50% or more at 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to baseline
EASI-754, 8, 12, 16 weeksPercentage of subjects whose EASI score decreased by 75% or more at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
EASI score4, 8, 12, 16 weeksEASI score change at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
SCORAD-504, 8, 12, 16 weeksPercentage of subjects whose SCORAD score decreased by 50% or more at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
SCORAD-754, 8, 12, 16 weeksPercentage of subjects whose SCORAD score decreased 75% or more at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
SCORAD score4, 8, 12, 16 weeksSCORAD score change at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
SCORAD subgroup4, 8, 12, 16 weeksSCORAD evaluation items(Extent Criteria, erythema, edema/population, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification, dryness, pruritus, insomnia) score change at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
Severity4, 8, 12, 16 weeksSeverity change of disease at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
IGA grade4, 8, 12, 16 weeksInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
IGA -1 or more grade4, 8, 12, 16 weeksPercentage of subjects who dropped one or more grades on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
IGA -2 or more grade4, 8, 12, 16 weeksPercentage of subjects who dropped two or more grades on the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
Total IgE4, 8, 12, 16 weeksTotal IgE change at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks compared to baseline
PGE2 and ECP4, 8, 12, 16 weeksProstaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP) changes at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
Immune cytokine4, 8, 12, 16 weeksTGF-1, interleukin (IL)-4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 31 and CCL17 at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks compared to baseline
Remedy used days and frequency4, 8, 12, 16 weeksDays and frequency of used remedies at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks
Remedy used subjects4, 8, 12, 16 weeksPercentage of subjects whom used remedies at 4, 8,12 and 16 weeks

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSeongjun Seo, M.D, Ph.D

Chung-Ang University Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSanguk Son, M.D, Ph.D

Korea University Ansan Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSoyeon Jo, M.D, Ph.D

SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORYoung-joon Seo, M.D, Ph.D

Chungnam National University Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDonghun Lee, M.D, Ph.D

Seoul National University Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMingyeong Shin, M.D, Ph.D

Kyunghee University Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 23, 2026