Skip to content

Does ACL Augmented With LEAT Better Controls Rotational Laxity Than Isolated ACL Reconstruction?

Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Isolated Reconstruction or Combined With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis in Knee Laxity, Graft Failure and Patient-reported Outcome Measures

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04136990
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-10-23
Start date
2020-01-13
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2022-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Keywords

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis, Knee Laxity, Porto Knee Testing Device

Brief summary

It has been suggested that adding a Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis (LEAT) to Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction has the advantage of better controlling the rotational laxity. The objective of this study is to compare the the sagittal and rotational knee laxity using the Porto Knee Testing Device (PKTD) - a MRI-compatible arthrometer - at 2 years follow-up (side-to-side and to baseline comparison) in patients that underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (isolated ACL) versus ACL reconstruction combined with LEAT (ACL+LEAT). Patient-reported outcome measures using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and graft failure (re-tear) will also be assessed at 2 years follow-up.

Detailed description

This study is a non-randomized clinical trial including 40 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury who are undergoing surgery and will be allocated 1:1 to either isolated ACL reconstruction (control group) or ACL reconstruction combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (experimental group). The principal outcome of this work is the sagittal and rotational knee laxity analysis and side-to-side and 2-year improvement. The secondary outcomes include graft failure (re-tears) and the patient-reported outcome measures (KOOS) at 2 years follow-up.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIsolated ACL reconstruction

Isolated ACL reconstruction using the bone-patellar tendon autograft.

PROCEDUREACL + LEAT reconstruction

ACL reconstruction using the bone-patella-tendon-bone autograft combined with LEAT using the mini Lemaire technique.

Sponsors

Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcomes Assessor will be blinded to the patient group

Intervention model description

Non-randomized 1:1 allocation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* no previous knee surgeries * contralateral healthy knee * positive pivot-shift (++)

Exclusion criteria

* revision ACL surgery * ACL reconstruction using allograft or synthetic grafts * multi-ligament injury * pregnant female * other injuries or conditions that may alter the knee function (eg. severe osteoarthritis) * requiring concomitant osteotomy * requiring concomitant cartilage surgery (other than debridement)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline of sagittal and rotational knee laxityBaseline and 24 monthsTo assess the post-operative knee sagittal and rotational laxity, we will use the Porto Knee Testing Device (PKTD). We will measure the anterior displacement on the medial and lateral plateaus and internal and external rotation in the lateral and medial plateau. Additionally, these measures will be combined to measure the anterior global translation (anterior translation on lateral + medial plateaus) and the global rotation (internal + external rotation in the lateral plateau).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Graft Failure24 monthsRate of graft failure. It will be considered only graft tears. We will determine the absolute risk of graft failure in each group, if enough data available.
Change from baseline of Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcomes Score (KOOS)Baseline, 12 and 24 monthsThe KOOS is a 42-item knee-specific questionnaire with five separately reported domains, including pain (9 items), other symptoms (7 items), function in daily living (17 items), function in sports/recreation (5 items) and knee-related quality of life (4 items). Domain scores represent the average of all items in the domain standardized to a score from 0 to 100 (worst to best).
Change from baseline of Tegner ScaleBaseline, 12 and 24 monthsThe Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10, developed for knee injuries (especially ACL injury).

Countries

Portugal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026