Skip to content

Comparison of Motor Functions and Quality of Life According to Feeding Type in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Motor Functional Level and Quality of Life According to Feeding Types in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04134533
Enrollment
35
Registered
2019-10-22
Start date
2019-10-25
Completion date
2020-01-15
Last updated
2020-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare motor functions and quality of life of the children, and anxiety and depression levels of caregivers according to feeding type of children with cerebral palsy.

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare motor functions and quality of life of the children, and anxiety and depression levels of caregivers according to feeding type of children with cerebral palsy. Children will be divided into two groups: children with oral feeding and children with non-oral feeding, according to Functional Oral Intake Scale. Gross Motor Function Classification System will be used for classify children according to gross motor function, Gross Motor Function Measurement will be used for evaluate gross motor functions, and parent-reported Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory will be used for evaluate quality of life of children. To measure caregivers' anxiety and depression levels will be assessed by using Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Parametric or non-parametric tests will be applied according to the variables distribution. Through this analyses, determination of the difference between feeding type groups and other categorical and continuous variables will be decided.

Interventions

OTHERGross Motor Function Measurement

These instruments will be used for determine the gross motor functional level and quality of life of the children with cerebral palsy and anxiety, depression levels of caregivers.

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children who were diagnosed with CP * Aged between 5-18 years * Must have cooperation * Feed by orally or non-orally

Exclusion criteria

* Having other accompanying neurodegenerative diseases. * Acute respiratory tract infection * Complications of enteral feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gross motor Function Measurement2 monthsThe Gross Motor Function Measurement (GMFM) is an observational clinical tool to evaluate motor function of children with CP. It has five basic sections that evaluate motor function in detail, including lying and rolling; sitting; crawling and kneeling; standing; and walking, running, and jumping, with a total of 88 items. Each evaluation is scored according to the level of achieving gross motor function without considering the quality of movement. While children performing each task in the GMFM, a physiotherapist scored each evaluation on a Likert scale between 0 to 3, of which 0 means 'Does not initiate' and 3 means 'Completes'.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gross Motor Function Classification System2 monthsThe Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was used to classify the level of gross motor functions in children with CP, and levels were based on child-initiated movement abilities, with emphasis on sitting, displacement, and mobility. The GMFCS uses a rating system of Level I to Level V, of which Level I shows the most independent functional motor level and Level V shows the most dependent functional motor level.
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory2 monthsPediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) was used to measure the parent-reported quality of life of children. The items of the PedsQL were scored between 0 to 100, of which 100 means never, 75 means almost never, 50 means sometimes, 25 means often, and 0 means almost always. Points are collected and divided by the number of items filled to obtain the total score. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
The Turkish version of the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory2 monthsThe Turkish version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were used to measure anxiety and depression levels of caregivers of children with CP. Both scales consist of 21 question and scored between 0-3. The highest score is 63.Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety or depression of an individual.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026