Skip to content

Comparison of Two Different Insulin Dose Calculation Algorithms in Type 1 Diabetes

Comparison of Carbohydrate Counting and Food Insulin Index Methods in the Determination of Insulin Doses for High- and Low-Glycemic Index Meals in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04131049
Enrollment
15
Registered
2019-10-18
Start date
2019-06-24
Completion date
2020-01-24
Last updated
2021-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus 1

Keywords

Adolescent, Carbohydrate Counting, Food Insulin Index, Glycemic Index, Type 1 diabetes

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the impact of carbohydrate counting (CC) method which is standard insulin dose calculation algorithm and food insulin index (FII) method which is a new algorithm on postprandial glucose following a high fat and a high protein meal in adolescent with type 1 diabetes. A randomized, single-blind and crossover trial included 14 adolescents aged 14-18 years with type 1 diabetes. All participants were sent to their homes for 4 consecutive days with a different glycemic index breakfast. The insulin doses of the meals were calculated according to CC and FII methods. Test breakfasts with different GIs and insulin requirements calculated with different algorithms are as follows: High GI calculated by CC (CHGI), low GI calculated by CC (CLGI), high GI calculated by FII (FHGI) and low GI calculated by FII (FLGI).

Interventions

OTHERHigh GI calculated by CC (CHGI)

This test meal with high GI were served as a breakfast after 8-hours fasting and participants were asked to consume the meal in full, within 20 min.

OTHERLow GI calculated by CC (CLGI)

This test meal with low GI were served as a breakfast after 8-hours fasting and participants were asked to consume the meal in full, within 20 min.

OTHERHigh GI calculated by FII (FHGI)

This test meal with high GI were served as a breakfast after 8-hours fasting and participants were asked to consume the meal in full, within 20 min.

OTHERLow GI calculated by FII (FLGI)

This test meal with low GI were served as a breakfast after 8-hours fasting and participants were asked to consume the meal in full, within 20 min.

Sponsors

TC Erciyes University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 14-18 years adolescents * Type 1 diabetes diagnosed for at least one year * Performing self-monitoring of blood glucose and doses of insulin at least four times daily * HbA1c ≤ 9.6% for the last three months * Negative fasting C-peptide (\<0.1 nmol/L) * Total daily insulin use of ≥ 0.5 U/kg * World Health Organization BMI/age z-score of -1 to below 3

Exclusion criteria

* Complications of diabetes or other medical conditions including celiac disease * Treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents * Food allergies, intolerances, or eating disorder * Intestinal malabsorptions * Delayed gastric emptying * Viral or bacterial infection * Physical or mental disability * Clinical condition related to impaired digestive system such as cystic fibrosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postprandial glucose response by glucometerFour hours postprandial period (from fasting to 240 minutes after the test breakfast)Postprandial glucose response was quantified as incremental area under the curve (iAUC) (mg/dL x minutes), which was calculated according to the trapezoidal rule by using blood glucose values at time points 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 and 240 minutes.
Postprandial glucose response by continous glucose monitoringFour hours postprandial period (from fasting to 240 minutes after the test breakfast)Postprandial glucose response was quantified as incremental area under the curve (iAUC) (mg/dL x minutes), which was calculated according to the trapezoidal rule by using blood glucose values at time points 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110, 115, 120, 125, 130, 135, 140, 145, 150, 155, 160, 165, 170, 175, 180, 185, 190, 195, 200, 205, 210, 215, 220, 225, 230, 235 and 240 minutes.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026