Skip to content

Tunnel Attachments With Clear Aligners vs Clear Aligners

Computer Designed and Chairside Fabricated Custom Tunnel Attachments Paired With Clear Aligners Versus Traditional Clear Aligners for Orthodontic Leveling and Aligning- A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04130477
Enrollment
34
Registered
2019-10-17
Start date
2019-11-01
Completion date
2021-05-30
Last updated
2019-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion

Brief summary

Incorporating wire threaded custom tunnel attachments with clear aligner therapy is a novel approach developed to address the shortcomings of the currently available orthodontic systems. This hybrid system is anticipated to take advantage of the benefits and overcome many of the limitations of traditional fixed buccal/lingual appliances and clear aligner therapy. The concept utilizes light arch wires to be threaded through computer designed, chairside-fabricated composite tunnel attachments to achieve better control of three-dimensional tooth movements not achievable by clear aligners, such as Invisalign® (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA) alone. The superelastic feature of the arch wires allows delivery of more continuous forces than aligners alone, potentially permitting shorter duration of recommended aligner wear during orthodontic treatment. A virtual set-up would be used to plan the desired position of the teeth, which in turn will be used to customize the size and position of composite tunnel attachments based on how two round arch wires will pass through tubes within the attachments. The attachments can be placed on either the buccal or lingual surfaces of teeth, depending on clinical preferences and esthetic demands. This is achievable using in-house aligners, which will also allow the fabrication of aligners in the office or at a conventional orthodontic lab at a fraction of the cost of traditional clear aligners.

Detailed description

Specific aims: * Test and formally describe a novel method that utilizes clear aligners paired with computer-designed, chairside-fabricated tunnel attachments to achieve tooth movements that are challenging for clear aligners. * Conduct a randomized clinical trial to compare the ability of a traditional clear aligner system Invisalign® (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA) and a clear aligner system incorporating wire threaded tunnel attachments in: * achieving predicted outcomes; discrepancies in bucco-lingual and inciso-gingival positions between the virtual plan and end of treatment intraoral scan and will be measured in millimeters and angular discrepancies will be measured in degrees * end of treatment ABO leveling and alignment objective grading scores Materials and Methods: A virtual set-up is completed by the clinician to plan the position, orientation, and dimension will be customized on the teeth to be moved.Generally, they are spherically shaped and their dimensions are approximately 2-3 mm. Vacuum-formed attachment template will be made to take the shape of a tube-holding spheres, in which tubes are embedded. The tubes are standard in size with an outside diameter of 0.032, and an inside diameter of 0.019 and 2 mm length The template will be loaded with composite after inserting the metal tubes are placed in their predetermined location on the tray. Double tubes will be used when torque control is needed. 0.016 buccal or lingual round wires will be placed into the tunnel attachments along the attachments. Aligners will be delivered to patient to be worn for at least 8 hours a day and changed as determined by the Dental Monitoring application.

Interventions

DEVICETunnel attachments and light Nickel Titanium wire

Tunnel attachments planned virtually and light Nickel Titanium wire

Clear Aligner therapy

Sponsors

Harvard School of Dental Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Tunnel attachments as an auxiliary with clear aligners

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. healthy subjects over the age of 10 years and below 65; 2. eruption of all permanent anterior teeth; 3. non-extraction treatment; 4. maximum of 7mm of crowding/spacing; 5. no more than 45 degrees of rotations 6. no more than 7 mm crowding

Exclusion criteria

1. presence of systemic diseases, cleft lip and palate, craniofacial anomalies, syndromes affecting bone or teeth, impacted teeth (excluding 3rd molars), congenitally missing lateral incisors, and tumors of the parathyroid gland; 2. the presence of bridges or implants replacing anterior teeth; 3. cases requiring orthognathic surgery; 4. significant (\> moderate) periodontal disease, intake of drugs affecting tooth movement or bone formation (chronic use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, bisphosphonates, levothyroxine, or teriparatide drug class), pregnancy; 5. cases requiring tooth extractions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1) Horizontal movement in millimeters3-12 months of orthodontic treatmentThe virtual setups (predicted results) and actual results scans will be superimposed using a best-fit alignment method using Geomagic Control X (3D Systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina). Initial alignment will be done using 300 surface points, and fine adjustments will be made using additional 1500 points. This process will be repeated as necessary. Once satisfactory superimposition is performed, the x, y, z coordinates (mm) of dental landmarks on the setup and result arches will be exported and analyzed. Linear and angular measurements will be made to determine the accuracy of each system in achieving predicted vertical, in-out and torque treatment outcomes. The percentage of accurate tooth movement will be determined with the following equation: \[(\|predicted-achieved\|/\|predicted\|) 100%\]
2) Vertical movement in mm3-12 months of orthodontic treatmentThe virtual setups (predicted results) and actual results scans will be superimposed using a best-fit alignment method using Geomagic Control X (3D Systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina). Initial alignment will be done using 300 surface points, and fine adjustments will be made using additional 1500 points. This process will be repeated as necessary. Once satisfactory superimposition is performed, the x, y, z coordinates (mm) of dental landmarks on the setup and result arches will be exported and analyzed. Linear and angular measurements will be made to determine the accuracy of each system in achieving predicted vertical, in-out and torque treatment outcomes. The percentage of accurate tooth movement will be determined with the following equation: \[(\|predicted-achieved\|/\|predicted\|) 100%\]
3) angular movement in degrees3-12 months of orthodontic treatmentThe virtual setups (predicted results) and actual results scans will be superimposed using a best-fit alignment method using Geomagic Control X (3D Systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina). Initial alignment will be done using 300 surface points, and fine adjustments will be made using additional 1500 points. This process will be repeated as necessary. Once satisfactory superimposition is performed, the x, y, z coordinates (mm) of dental landmarks on the setup and result arches will be exported and analyzed. Linear and angular measurements will be made to determine the accuracy of each system in achieving predicted vertical, in-out and torque treatment outcomes. The percentage of accurate tooth movement will be determined with the following equation: \[(\|predicted-achieved\|/\|predicted\|) 100%\]

Contacts

Primary ContactAlyaa Aldohan, BDS
alyaa_aldohan@hsdm.harvard.edu8572658533

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026